Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. 2nd September 2008, 09:21 AM #1
    Woodwould's Avatar
    Woodwould
    Woodwould is offline What... you mean it's not 1792?
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    0

    Talking AYEWTKA Copyright

    Disney does copyright
    .
    I know you believe you understand what you think I wrote, but I'm not sure you realize that what you just read is not what I meant.

    Regards, Woodwould.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 2nd September 2008, 09:58 AM #2
    NCArcher's Avatar
    NCArcher
    NCArcher is offline The Laird
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Katoomba NSW
    Posts
    332

    Default

    Wow
    You really have to be p****d off at Disney to go to that much trouble.
    Was pretty good though.
    Those were the droids I was looking for.
    https://autoblastgates.com.au
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 2nd September 2008, 02:46 PM #3
    Master Splinter's Avatar
    Master Splinter
    Master Splinter is offline SENIOR MEMBER
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    723

    Default

    Ahhhh, Disney - open cut mining traditional fairy tales for corporate profit. Reminds me, they should be increasing their 'longer copyright' lobbying again soon, I think the copyright on Mickey Mouse is due to expire again.

    But they could do a nice 'tragedy of the commons' tale....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. Copyright questions
    By Rocker in forum HAVE YOUR SAY
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 20th September 2005, 10:34 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules