![Thanks](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/thanks.png)
![Likes](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/likes.png)
![Needs Pictures](https://www.woodworkforums.com/images/smilies/happy/photo4.gif)
![Picture(s) thanks](https://www.ubeaut.biz/wave.gif)
Results 1 to 13 of 13
Thread: Exposed Aggregate - excess salt.
-
21st May 2006, 07:21 PM #1
New Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 5
Exposed Aggregate - excess salt.
Hi all, I'm after a bit of advice/combined concrete knowledge. I've just had my driveway concreted. 8 cubic metres layed, dark grey/brown/black exposed aggregate. During the curing period, it became obvious that there was a significant salt/efflorescence issue. To make matters worse, the concrete was delivered in 2 loads and the first load is the only area that is affected. Now this is where I'm guessing because my chemistry knowledge doesn't go much further than burning stuff with the bunson burner in yr 9, however, I do believe that salt makes things dry faster. This would explain why the 2 serperate loads have very different levels of exposure ie contractor was unable to blow the top off the 1st load (no sexual puns intended). So not only do I have extreme salt staining (unable to be washed out even with acid wash) on the 1st load, it also has a relative smooth finish and less aggregate exposed. The supplier has tried telling me that it's the contractor's fault, however they can't offer any explanation as to why he only stuffed the first load, when the whole lot was layed and treated at the same time in the same manner. Any advice as to 'what to do next before legal action' would be greatly appreciated.
-
21st May 2006, 07:53 PM #2
Originally Posted by Vili
Sad as it may be, if the concretor is denying liability and the concrete supplier is standing on its digs, you probably have very little redress available.Cheers,
Craig
-
21st May 2006, 08:50 PM #3
Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Wagga Wagga
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 53
Hello Vili,I agree with Craig on this problem.I don't know about your area but here in Wagga the town is still small enough to engage tradesmen that you know personally and usually that means that if something goes wrong someone will fix it (myself included,I'm a bricklayer)But having said that I recently waited for twelve months for a concretor to accept that he would have to cut up and replace half a front driveway that was done in exposed agg.It was a big job but he also owns a diamond wet cutting service here and they had it out (bobcat)carted away and prepared on the first day and then repoured the next morning.But he did (after some debating)admit to responsibility for the rough work and of course that is the key to your problem ,no-one is taking the blame.I don't know how they couldn't pressure wash the agg unless they mistimed the procedure, it does seem a bit unusual to me.I wonder if fair trading would have a look at it as they do here.That would be a very last resort in the rural areas but maybe not down your way .
Regards
Terry
-
21st May 2006, 09:10 PM #4
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- brisbane
- Posts
- 200
Could you post some pictures, not that I could help, but some one else here might.
-
21st May 2006, 09:36 PM #5
New Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 5
Thanks for the replies guys. The supplier(largest in Australia, no names mentioned) came and saw the driveway 2 weeks ago an said they would send me the batch reports for the two loads the next day, as even they were surprised at the amount of efflorescence. 2 weeks later, many unreturned phone calls, no batch reports, I'm thinking they might have a problem.
At the moment I have half a driveway that is perfect, and half that is not. The base material from top to bottom of drive is the same(crushed rock), so if that was the culprit, you'd think it would affect the entire area, not just the first load. As for the contractor, I trust that he did everything he could to get more exposure on the 1st load without causing further damage. I was home during the entire process and watched as he initially treated the entire area the same. Exposing chemical was left on overnight, then the top blown off the next day with petrol gerni. After the initial acid wash, the true extent of the problem revealed itself. Further acid washing did nothing except start to affect the good part. A bit more acid on select test spots and pressure cleaning has been like trying to wipe off poo with teflon tape. Oh well, could be time to put on the boxing gloves. Your advice is appreciated.
Vili.
-
21st May 2006, 09:38 PM #6
New Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 5
I have photos, just working out how to put them on.
Vili.
-
21st May 2006, 10:47 PM #7
New Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 5
So here's a piccy of the drive. The steep section is the unaffected area, and just also happens to be the second load. Run off of the treating chemical has been ruled out as the there are sections of the first load(spoon drain) were pooling would occur if it did occur. The symptoms are even, right across the entire 1 st load of concrete.
Vili.
-
22nd May 2006, 07:07 AM #8
Originally Posted by Vili
Cheers,
Craig
-
22nd May 2006, 08:02 AM #9
Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Wagga Wagga
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 53
Hello Vili,Im just wondering what are the concrete supplier saying when they are blaming the concretor.(your first post)The whole process of placing and exposing the concrete seems to be a bit different here than what you are describing .I'm on my way to work now but will have a think about it later.
Regards
Terry
-
22nd May 2006, 08:21 AM #10
Originally Posted by Terry1
Cheers,
Craig
-
22nd May 2006, 08:38 AM #11
New Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 5
Here are the close ups. No need to tell you which one is which. The difference in textures is even across both loads. At the time of pouring, 2nd truck pulled in as the other one pulled out, so there was no issue in relation to the 1st load having longer to set. From the aggregate that is exposed in the 1st load, you can see that its the same stuff. The cement/sand mix though has to be questionable.
Vili.
-
2nd September 2007, 01:24 PM #12
New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Bunbury
- Posts
- 2
Exposed aggregate retarder
Looks like an inconsistent exposure of the concrete.
What retarder (chemical) did your installer use?
We are about to load our new exposed aggregate concrete website and one of the information pieces you'll be able to download is our Best Practice Placement Guide. Essentially this is a quality system for laying exposed aggregate concrete written for the consumer with loads of photos.
The exposed aggregate website should be up in the next couple of weeks -
http://www.concretewa.com.au
-
11th December 2008, 06:40 PM #13
New Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- melbourne
- Posts
- 1
when doing the method of exposed agg where it is washed off the next day, the timing when spraying the chemical is critical. as the chemical stops the cement from going off, if hit to early the mix will over expose and blow outs can occur, to late and it wont expose enough.
i would say the first load had dried to much befroe the chemical was applied.
also, has the driveway been sealed, this may take away the white patches..
Similar Threads
-
Exposed Aggregate Render (Using a wood float!)
By bitingmidge in forum LANDSCAPING, GARDENING, OUTDOORSReplies: 0Last Post: 26th February 2004, 11:52 AM