Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: See Saw
-
15th September 2000, 10:35 AM #1
See Saw
Mr. See owned a saw.
And Mr. Soar owned a seesaw.
Now See's saw sawed Soar's seesaw
Before Soar saw See,
Which made Soar sore.
Had Soar seen See's saw
Before See sawed Soar's seesaw,
See's saw would not have sawed
Soar's seesaw.
So See's saw sawed Soar's seesaw.
But it was sad to see Soar so sore
Just because See's saw sawed
Soar's seesaw!
......I know where I got it and I know you know where I got and I know you now know I know that you know where I got it.....
No further discussion will be enetered into
Stupidity kills. Absolute stupidity kills absolutely.
-
15th September 2000, 02:59 PM #2Retired
- Join Date
- May 1999
- Location
- Tooradin,Victoria,Australia
- Age
- 74
- Posts
- 2,515
Ah but did you know?
------------------
Ian () Robertson
"We do good turns every day"
-
15th September 2000, 03:36 PM #3
How much wood would a Woodchuck chuck if a Woodchuck could chuck wood?
A Woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a Woodchuck would chuck if a Woodchuck could chuck wood. But a Woodchuck can't chuck wood! So a Woodchuck wouldn't chuck as much wood as a Woodchuck would chuck, if a Woodchuck could chuck wood! Phew!!!
Bet ya didn't know that.KEEP A LID ON THE GARBAGE... Report spam, scams, and inappropriate posts, PMs and Blogs.
Use the Report icon at the bottom of all Posts, PM's and Blog entries.
Bookmarks