Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: timber ID

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Rockhampton
    Age
    63
    Posts
    1,871

    Default timber ID

    A timber ID please, a gum/euc local to a couple hrs drive south of Rocky and more probly, machined OK, minimal patches of tearout, not much smell, 1inch wide white sapwood, no borers or bugs that I could see, fairly hard/dense, red to very dark red, I'd say it moves a bit during drying as these boards where a bit rugged looking, not much end splitting but stable once dried....
    pics...

    Attachment 127713

    Attachment 127714

    Attachment 127715

    Thanks
    Pete

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Dundowran Beach
    Age
    76
    Posts
    694

    Question

    No help but it looks a bit like a couple of trees we had growing at the school where I taught. No one could ever identify them for me.

    Nice looking timber.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    yetman
    Posts
    6

    Default

    I am not sure but could be Mackay Cedar, which used to be called albizzia toona. If it is, it only occurs in small patches near Mackay, I tried to collect seeds to grow it but apparently only flowers every 7 years.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bagdad Tasmania
    Age
    77
    Posts
    0

    Default Timber ID

    Looks to me very much like She Oak.

    Quote Originally Posted by pjt View Post
    A timber ID please, a gum/euc local to a couple hrs drive south of Rocky and more probly, machined OK, minimal patches of tearout, not much smell, 1inch wide white sapwood, no borers or bugs that I could see, fairly hard/dense, red to very dark red, I'd say it moves a bit during drying as these boards where a bit rugged looking, not much end splitting but stable once dried....
    pics...

    Attachment 127713

    Attachment 127714

    Attachment 127715

    Thanks
    Pete

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Toowoomba, Qld
    Age
    31
    Posts
    337

    Default

    It's Brush Box Lophostemon Confertus. No doubt about it

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Coffs Harbour
    Posts
    574

    Default

    Its the wrong bark for brushbox, BB has scaly bark on lower tree with smooth bark on upper, not a stringy type bark like in pic. Very hard to tell what it is from the amount of material shown
    regards inter

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Rockhampton
    Age
    63
    Posts
    1,871

    Default

    Thanks to everyone for replying, I'll take a few more and see if I can get a better/bigger pic showing more face
    Pete

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Dundowran Beach
    Age
    76
    Posts
    694

    Exclamation

    NOT Brush box. Totally wrong bark!!!

    Any chance of foliage pics???

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    8

    Default

    I agree that the pic shows bark that is wrong for brush box. The bark is exactly right for swamp box Lophostemon suaveolens.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Hervey Bay QLD
    Posts
    160

    Default

    turpentine or bloodwood?? need to see more of the outer tree

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    yarra valley
    Posts
    610

    Default

    is there much gum vein in the timber? bark looks like messmate but wrong colour timber

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Rockhampton
    Age
    63
    Posts
    1,871

    Default

    I wouldn't have said BB either, I have some of that, (have been told it's BB, I think I got an ID here a while back as well) and the as yet unkown is not BB, the unkown has no smell or very little when machining it and no gum viens, it has a fair bit of distortion around any knots or similiar faults and I got it as boards so no leaves/flowers etc.
    BB has a destinctive mineral oil smell a bit like diff oil and creates way more fine dust, my experience with it anyway...
    Took some more pics, tried to load them but I think no.2 kid has done something to camera/cable/computer will look into it...
    Pete

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Wauchope NSW
    Age
    79
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Hi Pete

    What about satinea turpentine ,bark is turpentine type and right for that area.

    Cheers Tony
    Tony

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dorrigo
    Posts
    270

    Default

    I agree. The bark is wrong for bloodwood and brush box. I think it's terpentine.

    cheers
    Steve

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Dundowran Beach
    Age
    76
    Posts
    694

    Question

    Could be Turpentine, although most Turp. I have dealt with is darker than that.

    Bark matches Turp. Pity about no leaves and , particularly, fruit as that would settle the case.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 6th November 2006, 12:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •