Thanks: 7
Likes: 16
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 42
Thread: I should have charged more
-
13th October 2023, 11:54 AM #1
I should have charged more
A member of our community Facebook page enquired about where to find wood trims, she posted these two photos
IMG_8986.jpegIMG_8985.jpeg
After watching the post and seeing some fruitless suggestions such as wrong timber ID and suppliers I knew didn't carry it, I contacted them to say I could fabricate it (it is part of my ulterior plan to get my business out in the community since I have worked on the down-low by word of mouth for over 20 years). They brought a sample over that helped confirm it was kwila and we agreed on a pricing. I used an offcut of kwila screen board to work through the best way to make it. Thus with the use of bandsaw, thicknesser, router table and table saw, and a bit of dark stain, I arrived at the sample shown in the photos here, with original on left and mine on right in both photos:
IMG_8948.jpgIMG_8947.jpg
Then I got a phone call from them that their contractor was concerned mine was thicker (which was immaterial, it just changes the size of the gap behind the trim) and could I match the original exactly. Wow! I thought; these contractors must be really fussy and on the ball, so I went ahead and made the full run a little thinner. A young fella came to collect them. Later in the day the owner thanked me for making such a good match and saving them lots of hours on a wild goose chase. Then they sent through some photos of the completed install (my trim on right in both). I was a little bit rocked by the standard of the work but the owner seemed happy enough. I asked a few investigative questions and found out they didn't even have a mitre saw (OK, no one did 60 years ago, but with hand tools you could still make a tight joint ffs, and maybe mitre your skirtings)
I need to put my rates UP!
IMG_8973.jpegIMG_8971.jpeg
-
13th October 2023, 12:17 PM #2GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Albury
- Posts
- 2,903
Yep, they're carpenters. You really shouldn't have expected anything better, but it is distressing, isn't it.
-
13th October 2023, 01:33 PM #3GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2016
- Location
- Brisbane
- Age
- 57
- Posts
- 1,264
They are carpenters. Not butchers. I just had a new house built. No way would I have accepted that.
My YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/2_KPRN6I9SE
-
13th October 2023, 02:58 PM #4
-
13th October 2023, 05:22 PM #5
Yeah that was the ultimate insult a Foundry Moulder could lay on a patternmaker.
CAR PENT ER
So you’d tell them to stop making sandcastles and get back to work.
H.Jimcracks for the rich and/or wealthy. (aka GKB '88)
-
13th October 2023, 06:14 PM #6SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Location
- Auckland, New Zealand
- Posts
- 995
A lot of times we put a lot of effort to produce something that we are proud of but the client didnt even care - its somewhat disheartening.
years ago I used to make shoe rack, I always put 2 coat of finish on the top face and 1 coat on the bottom face. when I delivered the client turned the shoe rack upside down, because he simply preferred that way.SCM L'Invincibile si X, SCM L'Invincibile S7, SCM TI 145EP, SCM Sandya Win 630, Masterwood OMB1V, Meber 600, Delta RJ42, Nederman S750, Chicago Pneumatics CPRS10500, Ceccato CDX12
-
13th October 2023, 07:25 PM #7
-
13th October 2023, 07:52 PM #8Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
- Melbourne
- Age
- 73
- Posts
- 356
Agree. Or, if they are carpenters, they're terrible ones.
I'm not a qualified carpenter but I do a fair bit of carpentry in my handyman business. No way either skirt joint is acceptable. The internal one should have been scribed, which should be a basic skill for any carpenter. But as they couldn't even match the bottom of the skirts in their crappy mitre a scribed joint would be well beyond them. Beats me how anyone could leave a job like that and expect to be paid.
-
13th October 2023, 08:00 PM #9Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
- Melbourne
- Age
- 73
- Posts
- 356
Separate issue. What are those pine or similar battens / spacers / covers on the external mitre doing? The end grain butt joint on top of the OP's work is beyond crappy if it's intended to be permanent, whoever installed it.
-
13th October 2023, 08:48 PM #10GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- melbourne australia
- Posts
- 2,585
I’m going to go against the flow here and suggest that the poor 45* internal mitre is due to the difference in the old versus new trim profiles. The new one (right) looks to be quite a bit bigger. I don’t know how you would get a nice looking mitre in that case.
-
13th October 2023, 09:02 PM #11
-
13th October 2023, 09:06 PM #12
Well you’re wrong. It was very nearly a perfect match. They did not cut the angle correctly and then did not match the angle of the original on the corner. As you can see the edges are offset. They should have scribed this joint anyway.
If say there was a variation from some of the installed stuff, they should have done what I told them and take a bit off the 45 degree backs with a block plane just on the end to fair in the joint. There’s no excuse
-
13th October 2023, 09:54 PM #13GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- melbourne australia
- Posts
- 2,585
-
13th October 2023, 09:57 PM #14Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
- Melbourne
- Age
- 73
- Posts
- 356
-
14th October 2023, 01:51 AM #15
in the photo with the external mitre, the unfinished stuff with the butt joint is the new skirting board, it is a rectangular section timber that is against the wall and behind the scotia trim. There are no old skirting boards. There is another photo I put up that shows a part of the wall with the new pine skirt before they put on the scotia. I don’t know the context of the internal mitre it is too closely cropped.