Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    South Coast NSW
    Posts
    25

    Default roofing iron pros/cons

    A couple of questions,

    cliplock costs more, do you guys think its justified? and what are the benefits except less screws...

    if I was going to redo the roof with standard colorbond (corrugated)... it comes in .42 and .48 i think...
    is there going to be any problems with the thinner cheaper sheets?

    If my roof is flat except it has a 60mm rise in the centre then falls down on the other side ( so gutters on each length side of roof.... new iron wouldnt need to be prefab rolled would it? Thatd be overkill wouldnt it?

    ta

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    62
    Posts
    133

    Default

    The 60mm rise is over what distance? Corry, infact all metal roofing has a minimum fall to adequately drain water away and that sounds like it could be way below the minimum.

    Also is there a ridge cap at the top?
    Cheers

    Alan M

    My Daughter's food blog www.spicyicecream.com.au

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    South Coast NSW
    Posts
    25

    Default

    hi
    very possible it isnt legal. House has been here for about twentyfive years / remote location etc
    no ridgecap, its about a 9m length of iron which simply has higher battens in the centre of the roof hence the fall.
    A bit like the harbour bridge, but real low if you follow, just a slight roll from one side to the other
    No problems in 20 years though...no leaks and we gets heaps of rain sometimes...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    some considerations for you.
    Lysaght's recommended slope for different roof profiles:
    1 in 12 (5°) Corrugated iron
    1 in 20 (3°) Spandek Hi-ten
    1 in 30 (2°) Trimdeck Hi-Ten, 0.47mm thick Klip-Lok
    1 in 50 (1°) 0.53 and 0.65mm thick Klip-Lok

    so there is one reason to use the heavier gauge Klip-Lok, it'll go on a flatter slope

    a second reason is that the supports can be further apart for the heavier gauge steel
    Using Klip-Lok as an example internal spans can be 2.7m for 0.65 sheet, 2.1m for 0.53mm and 1.3m for 0.47mm
    if you opt for corrugated iron, internal spans are limited to 1.2m for 0.47mm sheet and 1.6M for 0.53mm sheet
    — how far apart are the rows of screws on your roof?

    a third reason is eaves overhang can be greater with the thicker shets

    a fourth reason is the ability of the roof to support and shed water when it rains really really really heavily. Each roofing profile has a different characteristic. Corrugated iron will leak once the water depth exceeds about 16mm, with Klip-Lok the water depth needs to exceed about 40mm — hence the steeper slope required for corugated iron


    confused?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    South Coast NSW
    Posts
    25

    Default

    nope.
    beautiful answer


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •