Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Laurieton
    Posts
    0

    Thumbs down Call me cynical, suspicious, whatever....

    In a current wood working magazine there is an assessment of several jack planes. Most probably not undeservingly the Lie-Nielsen gets the top rating of five stars. Being awarded five stars in each of the five categories except one, where it got four. However, at the Lie-Nielsen stand at the Woodworking Show is the author. All fitted out in his Lie-Nielsen T-shirt and bad mouthing Veritas to a potential customer whilst I was there. One can only wonder what the value is of the article now, and if the magazine's past and future evaluations are any more impartial.
    Bob

    "If a man is after money, he's money mad; if he keeps it, he's a capitalist; if he spends it, he's a playboy; if he doesn't get it, he's a never-do-well; if he doesn't try to get it, he lacks ambition. If he gets it without working for it; he's a parasite; and if he accumulates it after a life time of hard work, people call him a fool who never got anything out of life."
    - Vic Oliver

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    South Oz, the big smokey bit in the middle
    Age
    68
    Posts
    1,914

    Default

    Yeah, but aren't Lie-Nielsen much more expensive? Isn't that all that counts? Bob, maybe you aren't even close to being cynical and suspicious.

    Cheers
    Richard

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Boyne Island, Queensland
    Age
    52
    Posts
    176

    Default

    Back in issue #30 he compares the Veritas and Lie Neilsen block planes. The verdict was that although the Lie Neilsen looks better, the Veritas was the better plane to use. In issue #46 he compares Dovetail saws and wrote that Adria or Ikeda were the pick of the bunch (there were a couple of Lie Nielsens in the bunch). Seems fairly impartial to me.
    Dan

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Age
    50
    Posts
    641

    Default

    You're a cynical suspicious whatever.

    But it is interesting to know.

    Dan
    Is there anything easier done than said?
    - Stacky. The bottom pub, Cobram.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Hornsby, NSW
    Age
    50
    Posts
    91

    Default

    I work in the public sector and it is important that any pecuniary interest (where you stand to gain financially or otherwise) is declared.
    Last edited by ubeaut; 10th June 2005 at 05:12 PM. Reason: Changed at Slavo's request
    If I do not clearly express what I mean, it is either for the reason that having no conversational powers, I cannot express what I mean, or that having no meaning, I do not mean what I fail to express. Which, to the best of my belief, is not the case.
    Mr. Grewgious, The Mystery of Edwin Drood - Charles Dickens

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Laurieton
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Given that Lie-Nielsen's operation in Australia in new, and taking into account the coments made by Slavo and Dan, then I can accept that previous evaluation results are as presented. However, my suspicions still exist re the current publication. Though I would like to believe the results are as represented based on the criteria used.
    Bob

    "If a man is after money, he's money mad; if he keeps it, he's a capitalist; if he spends it, he's a playboy; if he doesn't get it, he's a never-do-well; if he doesn't try to get it, he lacks ambition. If he gets it without working for it; he's a parasite; and if he accumulates it after a life time of hard work, people call him a fool who never got anything out of life."
    - Vic Oliver

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Boyne Island, Queensland
    Age
    52
    Posts
    176

    Default

    If what Slavo said is correct then I think I'll join you Bob and be a bit suspicious of any future reviews and possibly the current one also.
    Dan

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Age
    50
    Posts
    641

    Default

    It's quite simple.

    Any review should be INDEPENDENT. The person doing the review should have no interest whatsoever in any of the reviewed items or his/her review WILL be biased.

    Dan
    Is there anything easier done than said?
    - Stacky. The bottom pub, Cobram.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Albany WA
    Age
    84
    Posts
    227

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DanP
    It's quite simple.

    Any review should be INDEPENDENT. The person doing the review should have no interest whatsoever in any of the reviewed items or his/her review WILL be biased.

    Dan
    Dan, Dan, Dan.
    If reviews were independant we would get honest results. After 105 years, why start now? The results of reviews should favour the party trying to avoid critisism or, otherwise, should be secret and hidden from the public for 30 years.
    Your radical views could lead us to the :eek: truth :eek: . Can we cope with that?
    The advertising industry would collapse.

    It only takes one drink to get me loaded. Trouble is, I can't remember if it's the thirteenth or fourteenth.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    What came first, the review or the association with Lie Nielsen? If he was already associated with them when the review was written, it should have been in his profile along with "professional woodworker and woodwork teacher" doncha think?
    "I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Near Bodgy, AlexS, Wongo & CraigB
    Age
    19
    Posts
    744

    Default

    theres a jack plane review in an earlier AWR where clifton & lie neilsen were compared. I think the LN won but the Clifton was pretty good too. certainly not the drubbing that it got in this issue of AWR.

    ?? maybe it was a faulty item sent for review or maybe he wasnt allowed to keep it ??
    Zed

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    I read the jack plane review again last night. There's a remark at the end in his summing up where he talks glowingly about Lie Nielsen and how they don't "innovate for the sake of it", which I reckon is directed fair and square at Lee Valley. It doesn't surprise me that he was bagging Lee Valley at the show.

    There was one other negative comment I heard from another party at the show about Lee Valley and that was regarding the angle of the handle, which this person reckons is too upright making it uncomfortable to use for long periods.
    "I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Near Bodgy, AlexS, Wongo & CraigB
    Age
    19
    Posts
    744

    Default

    if youre gunna use a jack plane for long periods - its a perfect excuse for a jointer or thicknesser yeah ???
    Zed

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Australia and France
    Posts
    2,869

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silentC
    There was one other negative comment I heard from another party at the show about Lee Valley and that was regarding the angle of the handle, which this person reckons is too upright making it uncomfortable to use for long periods.
    Interesting comment, I've seen that somewhere before and read that surprisingly the reviewer found it more comfortable the longer he used it.

    What that sort of comment says to me, is that the bench is too low... think about it!

    Of course "standard" bench heights were set many, many decades (centuries?) ago when the average bod was much much shorter, and we didn't understand anthropometrics, and plane handles were designed "traditionally" rather than functionally. Technically it is impossible to design a plane handle to work at one bench height for all sizes of user.

    As Zed said, that's what machines are for!

    I don't want to get into a Holden/Ford argument here, (I can't even imagine what I could do with a better plane than my LV LA Jack :eek: ) because this thread is all about biased reporting, or more correctly undeclared vested interests.

    Would one or two of the subscribers to the magazine please take the same time they took to post here, and write to the editor voicing their concern.

    I think it would be appropriate then, to post the response so that we can judge fairly! In the meantime, there are plenty of other reviews out there that acknowledge the quality and performance of the LN while providing constructive criticism. Maybe those magazines are more worthy of subscription dollars.

    Cheers,

    P

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    What that sort of comment says to me, is that the bench is too low... think about it!
    That's what I said! Given the fellow who made the remark is a maker of benches, it seemed the obvious thing to say at the time
    "I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •