![Thanks](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/thanks.png)
![Likes](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/likes.png)
![Needs Pictures](https://www.woodworkforums.com/images/smilies/happy/photo4.gif)
![Picture(s) thanks](https://www.ubeaut.biz/wave.gif)
Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: sort by rating?
-
8th November 2006, 05:56 PM #1
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Canberra
- Posts
- 0
sort by rating?
In the sort by rating in a forum, in almost all case there's some 5-star ratings and then nothing. Surely there's some rated without the 5-stars? Given that the one that come after the 5-stars, which don't show any rating, seem to be ordered in *some* way, can I assume that, when sorted by rate, a high rank but lack of stars does indicate a hidden number of high star-rating (like it could be 5-stars so far but there aren't enough to be sure yet, or it's rated close to 5-stars since it's high on the list but aren't enough ratings to know yet)?
Rob
-
8th November 2006, 06:01 PM #2
G'day Rob,
I don't think I've ever rated a thread, no matter how good I thought it was. I have a feeling that the 'thread rating' option on this Bulletin Board has been largely ignored.
I guess it's like trying to pick your favourite child... they're all good, and you don't want the other threads to know that you've picked a favourite.Retired member
-
8th November 2006, 07:24 PM #3
Hey ho,
ratings have been discussed before and I think the best of best of thread is the preferred option.There was a young boy called Wyatt
Who was awfully quiet
And then one day
He faded away
Because he overused White
Floorsanding in Canberra and Albury.....
Similar Threads
-
5 star energy rating
By atregent in forum GENERAL ODDS N SODSReplies: 7Last Post: 20th June 2006, 05:40 PM