Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 57

Thread: Science Buffs

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Port Kennedy, Perth
    Age
    53
    Posts
    0

    Default Science Buffs

    This one is for the science buffs out there. If we continual to use the earth resource’s like coal and oil, how much effect will this have on the earths weight. Will this have any effect on the earths distance away from the sun EG will we move away from the sun or get closer to it?
    David
    giveitagoturning @hotmail.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    NUBEENA TASMANIA AUSTRALIA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Hi DJ.

    A very interesting question indeed.
    I don't know if anyone could calculate an answer for you, but it will be interesting to read the replies to your question.

    However I think your question might be irrelevant in the long term, as the earth will die in a few million years, due to sun activity.
    Check on line for the technical information of the above statement.

    That is why I laugh at "Climate Change", our planet has been changing since day 1, whenever that was.

    We are now, simply in a better, technological manner, able to record the daily events of earth and broadcast these events in real time around the planet.
    Yes we have climate change, but earth always has.

    Hope you get a good answer to your question.

    Paul.
    I FISH THEREFORE I AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    773

    Default

    With combustion and any other chemical reaction there must be conservation of mass, so whatever mass of reactants is consumed will produce exactly the same mass in products. Therefore there will be no change in mass as a result of these chemical reactions. In fact the earth is gradually putting on weight from the stuff it traps in its gravity field. I don't know the physical effect of this on the orbit but it is likely to be vanishingly small. The Earth will eventually be consumed by the sun as it grows and dies, a long way off and it is entirely likely that mankind will be wiped out even before then by an asteroid collision or some other natural cataclysm or by self-induced destruction.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Dandenong, Vic
    Posts
    0

    Default

    I had to check if this was in the jokes section first.
    Matter cannot be created or destroyed (not totally true if you want to look up Pi and Mu Mesons).
    Unless chuncks are flying off the earth or flying onto it it still has basically the same mass.
    Your in more trouble from the poles shifting every squillion years or an Ice age.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HOOKED.UP View Post

    However I think your question might be irrelevant in the long term, as the earth will die in a few million years, due to sun activity.
    Check on line for the technical information of the above statement.
    I think you mean a few billion years? (approx. 5 billion or so, we are roughly half-way through the sun's lifespan)


    That is why I laugh at "Climate Change", our planet has been changing since day 1, whenever that was. We are now, simply in a better, technological manner, able to record the daily events of earth and broadcast these events in real time around the planet.
    Yes we have climate change, but earth always has.

    Hope you get a good answer to your question.

    Paul.
    It is not so much the fact that the climate is changing, but the rate of change, which is unprecedented over the lifespan of our species. (not to mention it appears to be going in the "wrong" direction)

    Back on the original question, as others have mentioned, the total mass of the earth won't change, but it will be getting redistributed. Whether or not that does anything to change local gravitational conditions, I don't know.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Port Kennedy, Perth
    Age
    53
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mic-d View Post
    With combustion and any other chemical reaction there must be conservation of mass, so whatever mass of reactants is consumed will produce exactly the same mass in products. Therefore there will be no change in mass as a result of these chemical reactions. In fact the earth is gradually putting on weight from the stuff it traps in its gravity field. I don't know the physical effect of this on the orbit but it is likely to be vanishingly small. The Earth will eventually be consumed by the sun as it grows and dies, a long way off and it is entirely likely that mankind will be wiped out even before then by an asteroid collision or some other natural cataclysm or by self-induced destruction.
    So if you have 50kg of oil then turn that into fuel and use the fuel. With the carbon tax sorry build up and the carbon gas and you were able to weigh all that, would it still weigh 50kg?
    David
    giveitagoturning @hotmail.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 1999
    Location
    Westleigh, Sydney
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,332

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HOOKED.UP View Post
    ... the earth will die in a few million years, due to sun activity.
    Quote Originally Posted by michael_m View Post
    I think you mean a few billion years? (approx. 5 billion or so, we are roughly half-way through the sun's lifespan)
    Phew! Had me worried for a minute.
    Visit my website
    Website
    Facebook

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Exactly (to 50kg of fuel burnt = 50kg of byproducts). From memory, the exception is with nuclear reactions. There is some mass lost with every nuclear reaction - that's essentially what gives the enormous amounts of energy released. The amounts involved though are vanishingly small compared to the mass of the Earth
    The other day I described to my daughter how to find something in the garage by saying "It's right near my big saw". A few minutes later she came back to ask: "Do you mean the black one, the green one, or the blue one?".

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    773

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by petersemple View Post
    Exactly (to 50kg of fuel burnt = 50kg of byproducts). From memory, the exception is with nuclear reactions. There is some mass lost with every nuclear reaction - that's essentially what gives the enormous amounts of energy released. The amounts involved though are vanishingly small compared to the mass of the Earth
    Not quite Peter, 50 kg of burnt fuel will give more than 50kg products because of the introduction of oxygen and a few other minor gaseous components, but the mass of reactants and products will be the same.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    723

    Default

    The earth is actually getting heavier, at the rate of 3-7 tonnes a year due to dust and meteorites; however the sun is loosing mass - about four million tonnes per second - via heat/light radiation (not counting solar wind losses).

    It is possible to see shifts in the earth's gravitational field due to mass redistribution after major earthquakes - http://www.newscientist.com/article/...te-orbits.html

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Woodstock (Cowra)
    Age
    75
    Posts
    832

    Default

    .......um......what about the increasing population, doesnt that add anything......

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,174

    Default

    The numbers being quoted are on the "small side" but this explains it far better than I could.
    BBC recently asked physicist and Cambridge University professor Dave Ansell to draw up a balance sheet of the mass that's coming in to the earth, and the mass going out to find out if the earth is gaining or losing mass. By far the biggest contributor to the world's mass is the 40,000 tonnes of dust that is falling from space to Earth every year. 'The Earth is acting like a giant vacuum cleaner powered by gravity in space, pulling in particles of dust,' says Dr. Chris Smith. Another factor increasing the earth's mass is global warming which adds about 160 tonnes a year because as the temperature of the Earth goes up, energy is added to the system, so the mass must go up. On the minus side, at the very center of the Earth, within the inner core, there exists a sphere of uranium five mile in diameter which acts as a natural nuclear reactor so these nuclear reactions cause a loss of mass of about 16 tonnes per year."

    Pickens continues: "What about launching rockets and satellites into space, like Phobos-Grunt? Smith discounts this as the mass is negligible and most of it will fall back down to Earth again anyway. But by far the biggest factor in earth's weight loss are the 95,000 tonnes of hydrogen that escape from the atmosphere every year. 'The other very light gas this is happening to is helium and there is much less of that around, so it's about 1,600 tonnes a year of helium that we lose.' Taking all the factors into account, Smith reckons the Earth is getting about 50,000 tonnes lighter a year, which is just less than half the gross weight of the Costa Concordia, the Italian cruise liner that recently ran aground."

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    nth coast nsw
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rwbuild View Post
    .......um......what about the increasing population, doesnt that add anything......
    Yep..sure does...overcrowding, overuse of resources, destruction of the natural environment, poverty, famine etc etc...it's a weighty problem...but won't add weight.

    what if the hokey pokey is really what it's all about?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Glen Innes NSW
    Age
    81
    Posts
    26

    Default Global Warming

    Its a bit hard to get your head around the Global Warming theory when its currently Minus 6 at the moment outside.

    Regards Mike

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Blue Mountains
    Posts
    0

    Default

    "We must never become callous. When we experience the conflicts ever more deeply we are living in truth. The quiet conscience is an invention of the devil." - Albert Schweizer

    My blog. http://theupanddownblog.blogspot.com

Similar Threads

  1. good science, bad science and twaddle
    By stolar in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATION
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 26th December 2010, 01:32 PM
  2. Breaktrough in Science
    By Breslauer in forum JOKES
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 16th December 2008, 02:56 PM
  3. Project for Maths buffs
    By Grue in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATION
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 20th January 2004, 10:07 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •