![Thanks](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/thanks.png)
![Likes](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/likes.png)
![Needs Pictures](https://www.woodworkforums.com/images/smilies/happy/photo4.gif)
![Picture(s) thanks](https://www.ubeaut.biz/wave.gif)
Results 106 to 120 of 203
Thread: New Qld Bike Laws
-
11th April 2014, 10:20 AM #106It's the motorists mindset that has to change not the cyclist
In a perfect world we would have bicycle tracks everywhere and never the twain shall meet. But in a country like Australia, with vast open distances and not much budget for roads, I can't see that happening either.
So I will just do what I have always done. Dodge the hurled bottles, ignore the hurled insults, keep my eyes and ears open, and do what I enjoy doing even if others think I am insane."I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
11th April 2014, 10:36 AM #107
Not so.
While it is legal to ride two abreast, if it is not necessary to do so (and if two bikes will fit surely one will, so that's NEVER) if doing so unnecessarily obstructs traffic then they could and should be fined.
Well maybe there are getting more and more of them. Much as I used to enjoy the health and fitness benefits when I was cycling (I could keep fit while commuting thus saving time even if it took twice as long to get to work) I would not go back to it now. No matter how fit and healthy you are you wont look good as someone's bonnet ornament. That is supposing that there really is a health benefit to inhaling all those exhaust fumes.
About 30 years ago the Indonesian government was facing a problem with an ever-increasing number of slow pedal-powered vehicles causing traffic congestion in the major cities. They directed the police to round them all up. They were loaded onto their Navy's Tank Landing Ships and taken out to sea and dumped. After a week there was a dramatic improvement in the traffic flow. I am not saying that our government should or would do that but it was what they did and it worked.
Cheers
Doug
EDIT: Incidentally I have noticed that our Navy has quite a large fleet of Heavy Lift Ships, supposedly for peacekeeping dutiesI got sick of sitting around doing nothing - so I took up meditation.
-
11th April 2014, 10:43 AM #108you wont look good as someone's bonnet ornament
Refer to previous. No point me trying to convince you, so I don't bother. All I can say is that in my circle of cycling acquaintances, I know several who have come off at one point or another (if you don't you're not trying hard enough) including two who were hit by kangaroos, but no-one who has been hit by a car. My sister was hit by a car crossing the road at Manly, so crossing the road can be quite dangerous in my experience.
I did run into a bus once on Glebe Point Road but I don't think it noticed..."I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
11th April 2014, 10:55 AM #109
-
11th April 2014, 11:03 AM #110
Jeez you motorists are an uptight bunch, it was meant to be a joke. Sheesh...
"I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
11th April 2014, 11:05 AM #111
There have been a lot of interesting comments, opinions and thoughts shared in this thread ... some I agree with, and some I don't, but I would never go so far as to ask for a thread to be closed because I didn't like what someone else was saying, or because I couldn't get someone else to see my point of view. Disappointing.
Cheers.
Vernon.
__________________________________________________
Bite off more than you can chew and then chew like crazy.
-
11th April 2014, 11:09 AM #112
Here is an interesting excerpt from a South Aus transport PDF. It makes you wonder if that applies to cyclists.
It is illegal to drive so slowly that you unreasonably obstruct the path of the vehicle behindCheers.
Vernon.
__________________________________________________
Bite off more than you can chew and then chew like crazy.
-
11th April 2014, 11:15 AM #113
I think it is targeted at drivers who deliberately slow down because someone is tailgating them or whatever. But yes maybe it could be interpreted that a cyclist who won't move over is in breach of it.
Otherwise, I think cyclists have a very good reason to be going slow (although 20kph is very slow)."I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
11th April 2014, 11:16 AM #114
-
11th April 2014, 11:22 AM #115
-
11th April 2014, 11:34 AM #116
-
11th April 2014, 11:50 AM #117
I can just about manage 50kph in short bursts on the flat with no headwind but cruising speed is in the 30's. The best riders I know can average around 38kph over shorter distances, but it's usually in the mid to upper 20's.
But as I've said my philosophy is to try and give cars room to pass as much as possible. I don't want them on my tail any longer than necessary. I don't subscribe to 'claim your lane' unless I'm approaching a roundabout or something.
I'm a low-impact cyclist and I want to keep it that way, impact free
(I used a smiley so people will know I'm being humorous)."I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
11th April 2014, 11:50 AM #118
GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- bilpin
- Posts
- 510
Glebe Point Rd, great place for cycling
Couldn't see a bus
Imagine if it had been the other way around, the bus ran up the back of you, makes more sense, you are harder to see. Your chance of an early demise would be increased markedly. And the bus driver has to carry that with him for the rest of his life.
Remember one thing: But by the grace of us goes you. It is not the other way round.
That there is an increase in cyclist numbers causes me little concern. Afterall, it is inevitable with ever increasing fuel costs. And I am sure there will be increases in motor bikes as well for the same reason.
And while the numbers increase so will all the statistics.
You see, I value human life. It is more important to me than any change of regulation and how they may or may not inconvenience. I understand that risk taking is an adrenalin rush and there is precious little else for the average Urbanite to get excited about. But when it comes to a stage when it becomes a Mexican standoff between those who are in favour of chancing their luck verses those who dont, it all becomes a little personal.
You dont want to get cleaned up on the road and I dont want to clean you up. I value human life. Yes, even yoursShort term answer; Revisit the rules. Long term answer: Remove the unnecessary risk.
-
11th April 2014, 12:01 PM #119
GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- bilpin
- Posts
- 510
-
11th April 2014, 12:02 PM #120
Yes if you live down Glebe point road and you're riding a bike, it's a pretty standard way of getting where you are going. Entirely my fault, I was tailgating and he stopped suddenly. Never mind. Like I've said countless times, I don't care what you think about it.
Actually I'm not an urbanite. I live on the outskirts of a town of about 800 and I cycle on the open road mostly, or on the bike track such as it is. WHen I lived in SYdney, I did ride quite a bit though. It's not as scary as you think but I understand that not everyone's nerves are up to it, so it's OK.
Why do you think you are in a 'Mexican stand off'? That's an unusual way of looking at it.
But every comment you make about the danger on the road reinforces the real solution in my mind: ban motor vehicles. Like you say they are very dangerous. Shouldn't be allowed. Imagine how low the road toll would be if they didn't exist? "Two cyclists had a collision today. They shook hands and went their separate ways." That would make a great change from "Family of 5 die in collision with semi trailer" don't you think?"I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
Similar Threads
-
New IR laws...
By Toolin Around in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATIONReplies: 72Last Post: 2nd June 2006, 12:24 AM -
Strange Laws
By Hartley in forum JOKESReplies: 3Last Post: 12th February 2000, 05:56 PM