Results 61 to 75 of 98
-
10th May 2005, 01:47 PM #61
heres the answer :
make everything legal, including guns. do what you want so long as you dont affect anyone else. if you do they have the right to shoot you. sure there'd be a lot of dead people but as in the case of the melb crime syndicates and the rest of 'em so long as they are only after each other then thats fine by me, just makes it easier for the coppers and increases the revenue of the funeral homes....
theres no easy answer, govts always play catchup, crims always are one step ahead... until they get caught. innocents always suffer - is that a reason not to chase down the guilty ? I think not - look at WW2; how many innocents suffered ?
I for one would volunteer to be the hangman of mr bryant or his ilk, it would bother me a bit if I was the one that offed someone that was eventually found innocent, but less so than the thought that mr bryant could walk one day.
opinions - like bums; everyones got one.Zed
-
10th May 2005, 02:11 PM #62
-
10th May 2005, 04:33 PM #63Who are you trying to kid? Tell that to the victims of the burglary's and armed robberies and thefts that are perpetrated in the pursuit of cash to fund the habit. The Bali 9 and every other smuggler are a threat to every person in this country, not just for those who get themselves addicted. To me they are all the scum of the Earth and I'm not at all bothered that they might cop the death penalty.
Dan
Rusty.The perfect is the enemy of the good.
-
10th May 2005, 09:28 PM #64
Even if drugs were not prohibited, they wouldn't be free. The related crime may lessen but unless it is free it wont stop.
DanIs there anything easier done than said?- Stacky. The bottom pub, Cobram.
-
10th May 2005, 10:48 PM #65
In line with this argument, it would be interesting how they fared in the Netherlands.
Was drug related crime higher before or after they legalised the vast majority of drugs and had the supply regulated by the govt.
Im simply curious....or is that curiously simple
Cheers
Steveif you always do as you have always done, you will always get what you have always got
-
10th May 2005, 11:01 PM #66
Do i think these nine should be put to death
Yes
it's that simple
they knew what would happen if they got caught
show what happened to them then move on
no need to show these 9 on the news all the time
what do they want Me to feel sorry for them
keep dreamingLucas
If at first you don't succeed
Destroy all the evidence that shows you tired
-
10th May 2005, 11:23 PM #67
The judicial system in any country has flaws. Some more than others. If any of the nine are innocent but are found guilty and put to death then it will be a travesty of justice that cannot be rectified.
If Scheppelle Corby is found guilty the judges could sentence her to death. This outcome is a real possibility. I am led, by the media, to believe that she is innocent. This is the problem with capitol punishment. Once it is applied, it is impossible to says "oops, sorry about that Chief".
Lock the 9 up by all means. Don't let them out. Just don't kill them.Photo Gallery
-
11th May 2005, 08:12 AM #68Originally Posted by DanP
Dead junkies mean no drug related crime.Mick
avantguardian
-
11th May 2005, 10:33 AM #69Dead junkies mean no drug related crime
Junkies usually still have people that love them. Legalisation alone is not the answer. If I knew what the answer was, I'd share it.
BTW, a few years ago heroin did come down in price to about $15.00 a hit. And you're right, GM, there was a spate of overdoses.
Rusty.The perfect is the enemy of the good.
-
11th May 2005, 12:12 PM #70
Got a vague idea the Pom's trialled legal heroin for registered addicts back in the 50's or 60's. Maybe jow or BJ or another pom might recall something
-
11th May 2005, 12:24 PM #71
Bring back the Taliban I say. While they were in power there was almost no heroin to be had. Should have seen the queues at the chemists for methadone It's amazing how much they want to get off it when they can't get it.
Is there anything easier done than said?- Stacky. The bottom pub, Cobram.
-
11th May 2005, 12:36 PM #72Originally Posted by DanP
They would have used 9 bullets and immediately eliminated the trial and due legal process.
-
11th May 2005, 12:43 PM #73
A very efficient system then!
Is there anything easier done than said?- Stacky. The bottom pub, Cobram.
-
11th May 2005, 01:47 PM #74Originally Posted by DanPMick
avantguardian
-
11th May 2005, 01:53 PM #75Originally Posted by DanPWhatever note you blow youre never more than a semitone away from the correct one....(Miles Davis)
Bookmarks