![Thanks](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/thanks.png)
![Likes](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/likes.png)
![Needs Pictures](https://www.woodworkforums.com/images/smilies/happy/photo4.gif)
![Picture(s) thanks](https://www.ubeaut.biz/wave.gif)
Results 61 to 75 of 90
Thread: Chain of custody...who cares?
-
25th February 2013, 05:14 PM #61
Absolutely right...couple of years back in Nth Qld,this clown takes himself and truck loaded with skidder into a national park and helps himself to over 100 ton of Maple/Walnut/Oak/Silkwood(only primary species of course) and takes off...only thing was,his truck had an oil leak,which left a black sticky trail on the road,which led the police conveniently to his stash of logs
...he got 6 months bed and breakfast for his effort
Mapleman
-
25th February 2013, 06:38 PM #62
Skwair2rownd
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Dundowran Beach
- Age
- 76
- Posts
- 694
This is true!. Have a look at the wonderful pieces done by Woodwould. All veneered, as were the originals on which he models his work!!
I was in Tassie a few years back an was listening in to a fellow in a furniture shop in Salamanca Place extolling the virtues of veneer.
I was stunned when one clown insisted that solid timber articles were better!
-
25th February 2013, 10:05 PM #63
Why not plant it out Brett..with species that are commercial and endemic to the area...the benifits could be improved soil quality,greater bio-diversity,soil stabilisation,shade for stock,carbon credits,timber(for use on the farm or resale),greater land value,weed suppression,improved aesthetics..aren't these benifits incentive enough?
Mapleman
-
25th February 2013, 10:47 PM #64
If the paddock is unused for long enough to be classified as "probably not going to be used again" then sure, plant it out. If it's just in rotation, then the farmer should surely know what he's doing. The thing I'd like to see addressed is combining both, if, and where possible. I've had plenty of good vege crops where there isn't consistent sun all day long (referring to the fact that trees throw shade, so all crop paddocks have no trees).
-
25th February 2013, 11:21 PM #65
Brett..next time you go for a drive in the 'country',look around and witness the high level of land degradation...it's everywhere...and why? you might ask ...we have removed far too many trees from the landscape...it's a national disgrace..our waterways are polluted,choked with weeds,the animals that used to live in them are now gone,along with the forest dwelling critters..gone too..don't tell me the farmer knows what he's doing..i live on 700 acres,most of it has been hacked to pieces..a great legacy for the next generation..bugger all trees left,and what few remain are either diseased / dying through exposure,or slipping into the creek as they are no longer protected from the ravages of flood..we haven't seen a wallaby on this property for years..their habitat has been wiped out,,plenty of cows though..when are people going to wake up to the fact that we can not survive without trees..they are critical for our survival,and yet we do everything we can to destroy them..planting trees is a very good habit to get into,and to witness them growing is a true joy...if we don't address the problem of deforestation soon,the consequences will be catastrophic..
Mapleman
-
25th February 2013, 11:25 PM #66
Awaiting Email Confirmation
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Chirnside Park, Australia
- Age
- 75
- Posts
- 30
I try and check, but most of the timber I use now is recycled from prunings and trees down. Just scored some oak branches that were pruned, the tree said to be at least 100 years old.
-
25th February 2013, 11:28 PM #67
and some of it is still illegally cut! Been a few court cases in FNQ involving illegally logged timber from areas like Mt Hippamee crater NP and Woolanmaloo Nth (Nth bank of Mulgrave / Russel river). World Heritage decimated a viable responsibly managed rainforest timber industry, but it was on the slide when the greedy companies moved in. Hardly any rainforest mills left now.
-
25th February 2013, 11:37 PM #68
Cheers Homeleigh...glad to hear you making a positive effort..salvage is a brilliant alternative..locks the carbon up,and takes the pressure off those trees still standing..surburban salvage can also yield some interesting and sought after species as well..good on ya mate
Mapleman
-
25th February 2013, 11:45 PM #69
Hardly any rainforest left...and what remains has been battered to death by cyclones in recent years..again,too much of the forest has been hacked at,and because of this,the forest has no means of protecting itself from what nature throws at it...i'm glad they have locked it up..the forests of the Atherton Tablelands are a shadow of their former self..they were never responsibly managed..hence(the forests) are nearly all gone!
Mapleman
-
25th February 2013, 11:51 PM #70
As the old saying has it some people take 20 years to grow a tree, others 20 minuets to cut it down. And that was before the chainsaw was invented.
RegardsHugh
Enough is enough, more than enough is too much.
-
26th February 2013, 12:21 AM #71
SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- gippsland
- Posts
- 688
Could deforestation be part of our erratic weather pattern's of late? who knows if mother nature is fighting back trying to reclaim the world, I'd hate to see what she throws at us when she's had enough?
-
26th February 2013, 12:44 AM #72
-
26th February 2013, 09:46 AM #73
Yeah, guess I was trying to be polite to our farmers. I was thinking about this for a while before responding: speaking broadly, we've had a lot of DIY farmers here for a long time (remember all those that were given a grant of land after their sentence was finished), and it's really only been in the last 25 or so years that the new generations of farmers have actually studied farming at tertiary level. Many, or most, of those people knew nothing of farming, and so they no doubt just did what they were told by "experts", who were themselves probably self-taught.
My own ancestors were given various grants of land in northern NSW, and I know that they had no history of farming (but rathermore timber-getting)
We know what frequently happens with DIY renovations.......so it would seem likely that the same thing would occur on the land where it's in the hands of people who don't know anything/enough about land care.
As near as I can tell (from a limited perspective) the trees were removed for two reasons:
- they supposedly sucked up all the water (which sounds like bollocks because they get their water from roots that are much further down than crop or pasture roots)
- they make using broad harvesting machinery more difficult/impossible
Ozhunter may be able to provide some insight here, being a farmer and all. Not sure how many generations it goes back in his family, but certainly his father was/is on the land.
-
26th February 2013, 10:30 AM #74
Novice
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- sydney
- Posts
- 15
-
26th February 2013, 10:48 AM #75
And speak of the devil.....
I know MM has seen this thread, and it's bang on where we (I?) have deviated to in this discussion.