Results 46 to 60 of 62
Thread: Lance Armstrong....
-
19th January 2013, 09:06 AM #46
Your definition of a hero is a bit restrictive. Myself and many others consider Professor Fred Hollows a hero.....he neither saved lives or put his life at risk to do so. What he did do is save the eyesight of thousands of people in third world countries.
I also consider Neil Armstrong a hero...he endangered his own life to get to the moon but didn't save any other lives in the process.
My definition of a hero is anyone who displays courage and good qualities.....someone that others aspire to be.Whatever note you blow youre never more than a semitone away from the correct one....(Miles Davis)
-
19th January 2013, 09:09 AM #47
-
19th January 2013, 11:07 AM #48
Sorry but I can't agree with your sentiments Ashore. The people he has hurt most are cyclists through the damage to the reputation of the sport. The people you refer to above aren't cyclists, they are people on bikes. I ride and I'm the first to have a go at others on bikes doing any of the actions you've pointed out above.
On my bike I obey every law that you have to in your car, I only wish to be treated as an equal on the road and not a potential speed bump.It's only a mistake if you don't learn from it.
-
19th January 2013, 02:33 PM #49
Until he confesses to genocide or bringing down a democratically elected government or acts of terrorism, which deserve the sort of air time it's getting... meh.
-
19th January 2013, 03:19 PM #50
Can I change tack just ever so slightly.
When money is introduced to sport there is an vastly increased incentive to win. When money is present at the level of top class cycling the incentive is there to win at all cost; No holds barred.
In a way, the only thing I find surprising is that we are continually surprised. Any sport that attracts huge prize money and requires physical strength or stamina is suspect. As the drug testing becomes more rigorous the drugs become more sophisticated and the exponents more adept at defeating the tests.
For me, I assume, (arguably incorrectly) that any standout athlete in the physical disciplines is suspect. Include in this athletics, swimming, weightlifting (in particular) and of course cycling. The football codes would be suspect too.
I don't really care ( although I am disappointed ) as most of the time I don't bother to watch them. It wasn't always that way. I emerged childhood thinking that life revolved around and existed primarily to play sport.
Today I wouldn't know which cricket team is touring Australia, who won the World cup (soccer) or who won Wimbledon. I watched about one hours worth of the last Olympics.
Some of this is because I've moved on, but some is because of growing disenchantment with the antics of the athletes and their ethics. I guess if you mind that there is cheating going on you should walk away and when I think about it that is just what I have done.
As for the despicable and very unsympathetic Lance Armstong, he made a big mistake. He got caught and now he is going to pay the price. If he is lucky he will come out of this disgraced and a pauper. Unlucky and he will go to the pen.
My own thoughts are that, taking his past behaviour and his arrogance, he has aggravated enough people during his career to ensure they pursue him through the courts until he owns just the clothes he stands up in.
Did I say I don't care. Probably not true as I am making way too much noise for somebody who doesn't care .
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
21st January 2013, 03:06 PM #51
I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment. You would be surprised at the number of people in the cycling community who have a go at rule breakers. You don't see that at all in the motoring community... And spare me the red-light rhetoric. It's a small percentage and needs to be stamped out, but they don't install red light cameras to catch bikes. If no cars ran red lights they wouldn't be there.
...but together with the coffee civility flowed back into him
Patrick O'Brian, Treason's Harbour
-
22nd January 2013, 06:37 AM #52
Soon to be a book and maybe even a movie
It should be noted that the book isn't written by Lance though, interesting to see what Sony do with their version referenced at the bottomIt's only a mistake if you don't learn from it.
-
22nd January 2013, 09:22 AM #53
-
22nd January 2013, 11:00 AM #54Jim
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 596
Abc radio quotes him as saying about a Sunday Times journalist who was getting near to the truth:
'F...ing Walsh, f...ing little troll, casting his spell on people, liar. I've won six Tours. I've done everything I ever could do to prove my innocence. I have done, outside of cycling, way more than anyone in the sport. To be somebody who's spread himself out over a lot of areas, to hopefully be somebody who people in this city, this state, this country, this world can look up to as an example. And you know what? They don't even know who David Walsh is. And they never will. And in 20 years nobody is going to remember him. Nobody.' Lance Armstrong, 2004.Cheers,
Jim
-
22nd January 2013, 11:18 AM #55
-
22nd January 2013, 02:36 PM #56
-
22nd January 2013, 02:44 PM #57Jim
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 596
-
22nd January 2013, 05:25 PM #58SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Normanhurst NSW 2076
- Age
- 82
- Posts
- 0
Lance - who
Well I think it is all over red rover - life means life and he cannot recover and must not be able to compete in sports.
It would be a good thing if he voluntarily repaid his illgotten gains. If not - go away. Drillit.
-
22nd January 2013, 10:08 PM #59
Dunno, of all those title he had to hand back etc. I have nothing about the next guy inline getting it... or did I miss it? Or maybe they think they all are takers.
Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso
-
22nd January 2013, 10:26 PM #60Jim
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 596
Bookmarks