Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 131
  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Tasmania
    Age
    48
    Posts
    118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shep
    my td5 landie on the hwy towing a large boat (1600kg) gets 8.5 ks to 100ltr
    I am presuming you meant 8.5 litres to 100 k's.

    How the hell do you get that towing a boat?

    My TD5 uses 9 - 10 litres per 100k's on the highway. (95 litre tank = 1000k's)

    Cheers, Jack
    "There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Mid North Coast
    Age
    71
    Posts
    100

    Default

    Why don't we all just drive goggomobiles?
    I'm getting tired of people whining about 4x4s. If you are nervous about sharing the roads with large vehicles then get a bus because I don't want to have to share the roads with a bunch of nervous people.
    I do a lot of country driving and I don't know whether it's just my own experience or whether other people have made the same observation but I think the quality of driving diminishes as the size of the car gets smaller.
    As for the chance of injury when being t-boned by a four wheel drive, what happens when a commodore hits a mini or when a corolla hits a Messerschmitt three wheeler. It's all getting a bit ridiculous and is looking more and more like mass hysteria. If you want to quote the figures of deaths of people when being hit by 4x4s you are going to have to also quote the percentage of the accidents that were caused by the driver of the smaller vehicle. Statistics are useless unless all information is provided.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    South Oz, the big smokey bit in the middle
    Age
    68
    Posts
    1,914

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by echnidna
    So how do we convert sawdust to gas??
    Mix it with baked beans and eat it

    Richard

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Over there a bit
    Age
    17
    Posts
    503

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by adrian
    ......................I do a lot of country driving and I don't know whether it's just my own experience or whether other people have made the same observation but I think the quality of driving diminishes as the size of the car gets smaller..
    I do a tad of country driving myself. I don't think you have a clue what your'e on about.
    Boring signature time again!

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Age
    65
    Posts
    4,239

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by adrian
    I'm getting tired of people whining about 4x4s.
    The discussion is more about "unnecessary and large" 4x4s.

    Quote Originally Posted by adrian
    I do a lot of country driving and I don't know whether it's just my own experience or whether other people have made the same observation but I think the quality of driving diminishes as the size of the car gets smaller.
    Must be just you. I find the larger the vehicle the greater the concentration required. Unless, of course, you just let the thing wander.

    Quote Originally Posted by adrian
    As for the chance of injury when being t-boned by a four wheel drive, what happens when a commodore hits a mini or when a corolla hits a Messerschmitt three wheeler.
    At a guess, I'd say a lot less than when a 3 tonne 4x4 hits them.

    Quote Originally Posted by adrian
    It's all getting a bit ridiculous and is looking more and more like mass hysteria.
    Funny you should say that, recent studies have shown crowd analysis to be remarkably accurate. "The Wisdom of Crowds" is recommended reading. Note that the "crowd" had pinpointed Morton Thiokol as the culprit in the Challenger disaster minutes after the event. (One example: http://slate.msn.com/id/2086811/)

    Quote Originally Posted by adrian
    If you want to quote the figures of deaths of people when being hit by 4x4s you are going to have to also quote the percentage of the accidents that were caused by the driver of the smaller vehicle. Statistics are useless unless all information is provided.
    Who quoted statistics? Nobody in this thread, so far anyway.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Tasmania
    Age
    48
    Posts
    118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by adrian
    As for the chance of injury when being t-boned by a four wheel drive, what happens when a commodore hits a mini or when a corolla hits a Messerschmitt three wheeler.
    Quote Originally Posted by Groggy
    At a guess, I'd say a lot less than when a 3 tonne 4x4 hits them.
    OK, the 4WD is heavier, but the commodore can (and generally does) go faster, remember high school physics, Force = Mass X Acceleration.

    I am sure somebody will say that by law both vehicles should only be travelling at a maximum of 100k's anyway.
    Yes that is true but if every vehicle on the road was driven abiding by every law governing them, how many accidents would there be?

    Cheer, Jack.
    "There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Katherine N.T
    Age
    54
    Posts
    24

    Default

    gday i found the best econ towing is in 4th gear (manual) and 80kph.
    the other thing abought 4wds is that they last a lot longer then passenger cars my farm ute just failed to pass for rego 2 years ago so now stays on the farm i bought it new in 1989 and did 1.3 millon ks with the only major repairs being 2 gear box rebuilds and one transfer rebuild and that was only bearings and seals.
    where most passenger cars are landfill after 10 years or 200,000 ks.

    shep

    oh and my bullbar is fully adr approved and air bag compatible

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack E
    OK, the 4WD is heavier, but the commodore can (and generally does) go faster, remember high school physics, Force = Mass X Acceleration.
    If we're going to talk generalities, the comodore is required to statisfy higher standards in terms of stability and braking than a 4x4.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack E
    I am sure somebody will say that by law both vehicles should only be travelling at a maximum of 100k's anyway.
    the speed of the commodore or 4x4 is not really relevant. The sides and doors of cars are reinforced. When one car is T-boned by another the impact is partially absorbed by the reinforcing. In a 4x4 T-bone impact the 4x4 hits well above the reinforced zone, often at head height.

    ian

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Too close to Sydney
    Posts
    133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiwigeo
    Get out to the shed man.....youve got a perfect excuse to lay on SWMBO !!
    I dont think the price of fuel will result in you getting lucky, but I'll try it and see how I go

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Tasmania
    Age
    48
    Posts
    118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ian
    If we're going to talk generalities, the comodore is required to statisfy higher standards in terms of stability and braking than a 4x4
    Is this true? Don't all cars imported or manufactured in Australia have to pass ADR? (honest question, not fishing )
    Quote Originally Posted by ian
    the speed of the commodore or 4x4 is not really relevant. The sides and doors of cars are reinforced. When one car is T-boned by another the impact is partially absorbed by the reinforcing. In a 4x4 T-bone impact the 4x4 hits well above the reinforced zone, often at head height
    Is this the fault of a 4WD owner who has not broken any laws?
    Or the fault of the car designer for not anticipating and designing for a possible scenario on the road?
    Or the fault of the government for allowing these unsafe passenger cars to be driven at all?

    BTW, my bullbar is factory fitted. The nudge bar on my ute is ADR approved and airbag compatible.
    You may ask why a nudge bar on my ute?
    It's not there for my safety or to injure others.
    The front of an XR6 ute would be quite costly to replace or even repair, and SWMBO drives the ute sometimes

    Cheers, Jack
    "There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Conder, ACT
    Age
    77
    Posts
    4,213

    Default

    What I love about people is their
    "I don't believe in..... so you should not...."

    It has stuff all to do with anyone else what some one chooses to drive providing it is legal. It is their decision and their cost.

    The most dangerous thing on the road is not the vehicle type but the loose nut behind the wheel.

    Let's get back to the subject which was the price of fuel.

    It is getting crook when I could fill my tractor up cheaper inside Woollies at the vegi oil section than what I can at the Woollies garage. :eek:

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack E
    Is this true? Don't all cars imported or manufactured in Australia have to pass ADR? (honest question, not fishing )
    for cars you're mostly right (small volume importers — I think small volume equates to less than 50 vehicles per year — don't need to satisfy all the ADRs), but most 4WDs are classified as trucks, so they don't have to (and in practice don't) meet any of the car ADRs.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack E
    Is this the fault of a 4WD owner who has not broken any laws?
    Or the fault of the car designer for not anticipating and designing for a possible scenario on the road?
    Or the fault of the government for allowing these unsafe passenger cars to be driven at all?
    you can blame all three!
    as a consumer I can buy any vehicle I want. If I buy a 4WD as a road vehicle 'cause I want to (as opposed to I need a 4WD to tow a boat, horse, etc) then I should acknowledge that my truck isn't a car and I should go and learn how to drive it properly. My personal rant is against people who justify the 4WD on the basis that they drive a couple of kms on gravel which gets a little slippery when it rains — to them I say go and learn how to drive. Drivers in Europe manage to drive 2WD cars on snow and soft ice so what's the big deal with an unsealed road?

    You could blame the car designers for not being able to see into the future. The ADRs that most of today's cars conform to were developed and implemented at a time when there were very few 4WDs on the roads. It takes 15 to 20 years before an ADR applies across most cars on Australian roads.

    we could also blame the Government for allowing people with a Class 1 licience to drive 4WDs — up until 10 years ago the mass of most 4WDs meant that a Class 3 licience was required — let's also blame the Government for applying a concessional tarrif to 4WDs and while we're at let's all take collective blame for not electing a Government that will ban 4WDs.
    But hang on, I vote, and there's noway I'll vote for a party that thinks it can tell me what type of vehicle I should drive.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Australia and France
    Posts
    2,869

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by adrian
    Why don't we all just drive goggomobiles?
    Because for the size of their engine they were relatively inefficient, but it's a great suggestion.

    I'm not interested in how many driving wheels there are, or who can afford to pay for fuel and who can't, but I am interested in why we are allowed to waste so much of what is a non-renewable resource.

    Oh yes, I know about oil company conspiracy theories, but why aren't the fuel efficient technologies that are here now not forced apon us, and why in this day and age to we have such a fixation on number of cylinders rather than efficiency???

    It's not hard to find four cylinder cars which are a lot less efficient than eight, and so on... the simplest solution is to make the user pay. INCREASE the tax component on fuel I say, if you can't afford it, drive less or more efficiently!

    Cheers,

    P


  14. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Beechworth, Vic, Australia
    Age
    63
    Posts
    21

    Default

    There was a post earlier saying that 4-wheel drives are safer than standard cars. I had heard the opposite but didn't want to say anything till I could back it up.

    The stats show that 4-wheel drives are 20% more likely to be involved in a fatal accident. See the picture below for details, the last column has the accident ratios between vehicle types.

    For the life of me I can't understand why a city driver wants a car that is 20% more likely to be involved in a fatal accident, costs heaps more to run and heaps more to maintain.

    One quote:
    "A more insidious problem is the lack of vision behind 4WDs. Almost ninety per cent of children killed in NSW driveways in 1998 were run over by 4WDs or large commercial vehicles.(2) Also, 4WD vehicles can be more difficult for other drivers to see past."

    I got the info from the Australian Transport Safety Bureau - monograph 11, "Fatal Four Wheel Drive Crashes"

    See: http://www.atsb.gov.au/road/mgraph/mgraph11/index.cfm for all the gory details.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    campbelltown NSW
    Age
    68
    Posts
    297

    Smile

    G'Day all,
    I have been reading a lot of the posts here and I have just got to put in my say!.. (1) industry needs 4x4's be it farmers, maintenance workers, etc...(2) it's not the vehicle that is unsafe, it's the people that drive them, the average ford/holden weighs in around 1200/1400kgs, the average 4x4 starts at around 1500kgs up, people drive them like sedans, and a lot of the time that's fine till they get in a situation and momentum and inertia step into the picture and they are really in trouble, hence my next point...(3) 4x4 drivers should be a class of licence in it's self or be under the "M" or "H" class, as they are a heavy vehicle capable of speeds equal to or better than some sedans but the engines are designed to rev harder and longer than most sedans, not for top speed but for the ability to negotiate difficult terrain. I have had 3 4x4's all for different reasons, the last 2 mainly for towing my boat. Selfish, no, safely yes, the old VP commodor was legal to tow the boat but it was right on it's max tow limit, not a good idea, it had a tendancy to push and was always in the back of my mind that if I ever had to "stand" on the brakes I would be in trouble. I traded up to a Jackeroo man 5spd did the job fine and had plenty of pull, but due to a lot of luck and medical prob's I have just bought a new Musso 5cyl turbo diesel auto and will keep it for a long time to come, (I hope). So my point is it's not the 4x4 it's the manner in which the person drives and his/her experience and ability to handle a very comfortably deceptive vehicle. I was trained driving fire trucks at high speeds very safely and defensively and have seen all types of ignorance and stupidity on the roads.
    savage.
    savage(Eric)

    Never, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •