Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 37 of 37
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Boyne Island, Queensland
    Age
    52
    Posts
    176

    Default

    I wish I had left this thread alone after my first post. But in post #2 I had added fuel to the fire which makes me just another one of the dickheads (or at least feeling like one).

    Sorry Robert.
    Dan

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Redlands area, Brisbane
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Neil/Robert,

    There is an upside to this getting an airing. I too had one eyebrow arching northwards reading the review as I recognised the author as the extremely helpful gentleman I talked to at the show on the Lie-Nielsen stand.

    So perhaps airing this openly has actually had a positive effect on the reputation of AWR, Robert and Lie-Nielsen. Unless this had been challenged I would have gone on thinking that something indeed was not as it should have been, to be polite.

    Whether an apology is due to one party or another I think is irrelevant. There seems to have been errors of judgement on both sides, from where I stand.

    Having been the victim of a professional slander (it's a long story) I know it hurts. My advice is that if either party still feels aggrieved then seek a meeting and sort it out as soon as practicable. Don't let it stew.

    One other piece of advice for Robert and AWR would be to run a clarification in the next edition's editorial. Be completely candid and the hearts and minds will follow.

    Kind regards,

    Mark

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sale
    Age
    69
    Posts
    558

    Default

    Robert,

    Like the other I also apologise, it's a timely reminder that sometimes we are too quick to accept what's before us without question. That's not good enough when the effect is to damage someones reputation.

    I also think you are being a little hard on yourself about being on the LN stand, on balance its just one of those things that looks fine at the time but different in hindsight. Why do we always 20/20 vision looking backwards?

    JohnC

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Laurieton
    Posts
    0

    Default

    I have just returned from being away for the long weekend and this thread has changed its colour during that time. As the person who started the thread I have to clarify that it was Robert's presence on the Lie-Nielsen's stand at the show, following the recent publication of the comparison of jack planes, that caught my attention. It should be noted that in my original entry that I did not challenge Robert's findings. I indicated that Lie-Nielsen most probably deserved the rating they received. However, as I also mentioned, as an observer at the Lie-Nielsen stand listening to Robert's comments on a Veritas plane, no matter how honest Robert believed his comments to be, it was not possible for me to then accept those comments in that light. Robert, this was not meant to be a direct attack on you, but on how one can accept the results of such an article when the author then appears to be representing the "winning" manufacturer. Please accept my thread in that light.
    Bob

    "If a man is after money, he's money mad; if he keeps it, he's a capitalist; if he spends it, he's a playboy; if he doesn't get it, he's a never-do-well; if he doesn't try to get it, he lacks ambition. If he gets it without working for it; he's a parasite; and if he accumulates it after a life time of hard work, people call him a fool who never got anything out of life."
    - Vic Oliver

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    Bob
    I've reread your original post and reread the magazine article you refered to.

    I really think you need to clarify what you meant by the potentially emotive phrase "bad mouthing" ?
    was it just a restating of the author's opinion as presented in the article?

    IMO the author is entitled to restate any of his opinions that have already appeared in print.
    I also don't like the look of the Veritas Jack plane, BUT I do like the look and feel of the Veritas low angle smoother — I got to try a Veritas LA smoother at the wood show and am now seriously considering swapping my LN LA smoother for a Veritas.

    Ian

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Laurieton
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Ian, I believe that the thread has run its course and I don't see any value in flogging a dead horse. So as not to appear to be avoiding your question I can only say that what I heard said would not have been printed in the article. Shame though, as it was more colourfull.
    Bob

    "If a man is after money, he's money mad; if he keeps it, he's a capitalist; if he spends it, he's a playboy; if he doesn't get it, he's a never-do-well; if he doesn't try to get it, he lacks ambition. If he gets it without working for it; he's a parasite; and if he accumulates it after a life time of hard work, people call him a fool who never got anything out of life."
    - Vic Oliver

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    HEYFIELD Victoria
    Age
    49
    Posts
    0

    Smile I'm Just Glad I kept Reading

    I read the reviews & read the start of this thread, I'm just glad I kept reading to find out the full story, I wonder how many people left this thread after reading the first few posts?

    Oh well, all I know is I think i'll stick with the Japanese dovetails saws.
    Us Westoners have only just learned the benefits of a saw cutting backwards.
    Der!?
    The Japanese have known this secret for years. I'll stick with the superior Japanese Dovetail saws when it comes to quality of steel.

    Hasn't anyone seen Kill Bill??

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •