Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    412

    Default

    I am sure they have done it to standards......but whose low standards have they done it to? did they do that side wall first and then the back,or was it the other way around ?

    Tools

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Launceston
    Posts
    30

    Default

    seems to me the new boards could have lined up with the old or at least been the same number of boards with even cover. The starting point for the bottom board can be influenced by a different floor structure on the extentsion. This may mean that there needs to be one more full board to cover thicker bearers or what ever. The proper way to work out weather board cover for a wall for new work is to divide the total cover . That is the top board will appear to be the same width as all the others. If this means that the boards are lapped a little more than the minimum then so be it.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Rushworth, Victoria
    Posts
    63

    Default

    Q1... why has he not lined them up with the stop batten at the bottom?
    Q2... why is the stop batten not lined up with the bottom of old boards?
    q3... why arent boards lined up wityh old boards.
    looks like answer could be found in laziness. too lazy to cut board around window, so start here with spacing and work up from bottom once its found whether or not delivered/ordered quantity of boards will cover minimum amount of space.. Must have had his horses' racing blinkers on
    yours in cynicism
    Andrew

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •