Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 50
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    perth
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Jarrah has only the good side grooved. The guy at Gunns (what used to be Bunnies) assured me that groove down was only invented by some wan*er on a tv show. However... it does make some sense to go groove down as per other posts or groove up, as per other posts. Ah this is just like the daylight saving arguement - perennial.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Port Pirie SA
    Age
    52
    Posts
    0

    Default

    I reckon lay'em groove up then next one groove down... at least then yer only half way wrong!
    ....................................................................

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    brissy
    Age
    55
    Posts
    29

    Default

    GROOVES DOWN...the way it was always meant to be...also,a knock on the surface of the smooth face is less likely to damage/splinter as if it were laid the upside down.....but if anyone insists on their deck holding water and mould on the surface, splinters in their feet and a deck that is difficult to sweep dirt from, go the grooved look

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    brissy
    Age
    55
    Posts
    29

    Default

    just as importantly, the pine has excessive expansion and shrinkage, looks horrible and buckles terribly

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Melbourne - Outer East Foothills
    Posts
    1,557

    Default

    One other major factor is cleaning. Much easier with grooves down with less trapping up dirt and dust.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    I have built acsess ramps that always have the groove up and running across the slope. I wouldn,t do them any other way.
    That's one situation where it might actually be a good idea.

    Most decks are treated pine and should be able to stand being damp.
    I wouldn't say that. Most decks I've seen around here are hardwood. There are T/P decks but most people consider them, cheap.

    If the smooth side was the face then the ripple side would be on the outside of the pack when they are delivered.
    I got a heap of Merbau decking earlier this year. Many of the boards are still showing the original rough sawn surface. Without exception, this is on the groove side.

    Jarrah has only the good side grooved.
    I've haven't bought jarrah decking but don't know why it would be any different to any other hardwood decking. See above.

    The guy at Gunns (what used to be Bunnies) assured me that groove down was only invented by some wan*er on a tv show.
    You actually believe what someone who works for Bunnings tells you?

    As for non-slip, the grooves might help improve traction perpendicular to the grooves, but they are even more slippery parallel to the grooves because of the reduced surface area under your foot.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    newcastle
    Posts
    216

    Default

    oh, why not just jump in. I was having a read of the public works specs for buildings, the modwood product and treated pine was mentioned and specified that in non weather protected areas that it is to be laid groove side up perpendicular to the usual direction of travel across the space.

    As for manufacturers, CHH recomend reeded side down for air flow, but gunnersons say, reeded up for grip or down for look - your choice. So probably the only people who are wrong are those that categorically say that one way is right, given there's a debate amongst manufacturers, and I'm pretty comfident that the people who make the stuff know their product pretty well.

    My best guess is that reeded side was introduced to try and minimise cupping, but the marketing dept decided that would be admitting a failure, so some have changed the message to helping dry out, and some for grip.


    For those that are convinced as a certainty that its to stop rot, and should be laid face down - think about this for a second - cca is immune to fungal attack and will not rot without seriously improper installation. Further proof of the longevity of the product can be found in any boardwalk over wetlands where they use , guess what?

    The answer is 42

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Werribee, Vic
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,312

    Default

    Exactly

    6 x 9 = 42

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    Well, there are really two questions that need to be answered:

    1. Why was the practice introduced?
    2. What is the best way to install it, the above notwithstanding?

    It seems as though getting an answer to number 1 is going to be difficult. Everyone thinks they know why it was first done. I know why I think it was done but I don't have any way of proving it. However, it doesn't really matter very much, does it?

    As for number 2, it probably depends on the situation. I will always put it groove side down because a) I don't like the look of the reeded side, b) it seems to me that this is the way it's meant to go, and c) it's harder to keep clean with the reeded side up.

    I have lived in a house that had a grooves up deck and you have to sweep it with the grooves, which doesn't always work out to be the direction you want the dirt to go.

    Finally, if you install it groove side up, some people are going to tell you it's upside down. If you install it groove side down, or use the non-reeded variety, no-one is ever going to notice.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    For those that are convinced as a certainty that its to stop rot, and should be laid face down - think about this for a second - cca is immune to fungal attack and will not rot without seriously improper installation. Further proof of the longevity of the product can be found in any boardwalk over wetlands where they use , guess what?
    They do it on hardwood decking too, not just treated pine. The rot argument suggests that the reeds help prevent the joists from rotting, not the decking.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    SE suburbs, Melbourne
    Age
    60
    Posts
    85

    Default

    I agree with SilentC. I lived in a rental place previously with the grooves side up. It's a bloody pain trying to sweep any leaves, flowers or dirt if the grooves are side up.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Over there a bit
    Age
    17
    Posts
    503

    Default

    Why not use cement?
    Boring signature time again!

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Werribee, Vic
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,312

    Default

    To keep the deckheads out.

    Too many deckheads in China

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    12

    Default Thanks for the super response guys

    Wow

    there certainly are a few reasons for and against grooved side down or up. I have decided, and in fact have laid the decking groove side up. (Sorry to those advocating the opposite ). The deck is covered and is not likely to become damp at all so I really have no rotting problem. Yes I get leaves blown onto the deck and yes it is a pain in the @rse to sweep the leaves up as well as dog hair. However I tried a few strips of decking prior to screwing them into place and I liked the look of the grooves on the surface. I guess that is the best guide I would offer if anyone asks me the same question after reading all of your most welcome and highly respected responses.

    Thanks for the information because it really assisted in ensuring any decision I made would not be too drastic.

    Donno

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    Thanks for the information because it really assisted in ensuring any decision I made would not be too drastic
    But you laid it all upside down. You can't get any more drastic than that :eek:


Similar Threads

  1. where to buy decking materials in Melbourne
    By Paul W B in forum DECKING
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 4th August 2006, 09:50 AM
  2. Feedback on decking project
    By nmilne in forum FLOORING, DECKING, STUMPS, etc.
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 9th January 2006, 10:44 AM
  3. Reeded Decking
    By mineman in forum DECKING
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12th March 2005, 11:07 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •