Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 16 to 30 of 30
Thread: Co-axial indicators
-
5th May 2014, 02:46 PM #16Pink 10EE owner
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- near Rockhampton
- Posts
- 4,298
The people on practical machinist think the co-axial indicator by Blake and others are rubbish and they just use an indicator on the stick int he spindle...
I scored a new metric Blake from the US ebay and think it adequate for my needs.. I am not chasing sub 5 micron accuracy..Light red, the colour of choice for the discerning man.
-
5th May 2014, 07:57 PM #17GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,770
Pretty much all been covered. And though it doesnt matter much anymore, 20 rpm is a little slow. You're not trying to take reading, just make the needle "wiggle" less. (come over and have a go) My knock off seems to be pretty damn close, others havent been so lucky and needed to do a bit of work to get them working right. As others have said the amount of Z used is painful, as can the Z movement between centering and machining(unless you have power Z). If your tram isnt spot on and you're chasing the last 5 micron you're going to have issues . With a DRO I prefer a wiggler setup about the same length as the tool I'll be using.
One of these days I'll fork out for one of Phils goosenecks.
Stuart
-
6th May 2014, 08:09 AM #18GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 2,947
Thanks for the offer Stuart. I don't think I would ever need to chase the last 5 microns. In fact I doubt that I have the test equipment to be capable anyway. 10 micron positional error would be the absolute limit I would suggest for me, even then I may be dreaming! Next time I'm over your way I'd still be interested to look at it.
Given the cost of that gooseneck and the availability of those plans, I find it difficult to buy a dedicated co-axial indicator now. I'd rather spend some money on a decent vertical face indicator and make the rest.
Thanks Ueee, I think I may make one similar to that. although I don't think I will use drill rod for the rods, I have some shafts from shock absorbers looking for a use. They are nicely polished.
SimonGirl, I don't wanna know about your mild-mannered alter ego or anything like that." I mean, you tell me you're, uh, super-mega-ultra-lightning babe? That's all right with me. I'm good. I'm good.
-
8th May 2014, 08:53 AM #19GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 2,947
Hi Michael,
Been looking at your Zero-meter and also the plans posted from Ueee. Looks all pretty straight forward, but what I don't understand is the purpose of the secondary adjustment on the indicator holder (the part that has to 2 smaller drill rods adjustment). I can only assume that is to allow you to bring the indicator back in close to the spindle axis for when you want to indicate off very small holes?
My question is, given that most indicators have their own dovetail attachment post, would a hole drilled to suit this and a knurled screw to nip up the post suffice?
I like to keep things fairly simple. To quote a lecturer I had once: Things should be simple as possible, BUT no simpler!
Then again there is most likely another reason for the design that I have not yet appreciated…..
SimonGirl, I don't wanna know about your mild-mannered alter ego or anything like that." I mean, you tell me you're, uh, super-mega-ultra-lightning babe? That's all right with me. I'm good. I'm good.
-
8th May 2014, 01:27 PM #20GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,770
Hi Simon,
I think you'll find that's just the way they came up with to do the fine adjustment.
You want simple, how about this? As is will go up to about 2" bore. Some tweaks might get some more out of it. As pictured the Z length would be about 115mm(about 80 of that being the DTI)
On a side note.. anyone know what the makers think about DTI's being used "sideways"?
Stuart
-
8th May 2014, 03:44 PM #21GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 2,947
Hi Stuart,
Doh! Of course, the fine adjustment. I didn't even think of that. The reason I didn't think of it is because the method I use ATM also has no fine adjustment. You have to fiddle to get it right. OK I'm liking this even more!
WRT using the DTI sideways, I have never given it much of a thought. I assume* it's OK.
* Yea, yea, never assume!
SimonGirl, I don't wanna know about your mild-mannered alter ego or anything like that." I mean, you tell me you're, uh, super-mega-ultra-lightning babe? That's all right with me. I'm good. I'm good.
-
10th May 2014, 03:58 PM #22
-
10th May 2014, 04:24 PM #23GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 2,947
Here they are. Ueee posted them in the previous page.
I think I'm going to make one too. I can't see it in these plans but I have seen images of this (google images of zero-it indicator) at other places and the fine adjust drill rods have compression springs between the holder and the main body. I assume this is so it does not rattle from the thread backlash on the fine adjust. There is a small knurled screw to tighten once adjusted but the omission of these springs would make it a little annoying while adjusting.
Edit: like this one: images of zero-it indicator
SimonGirl, I don't wanna know about your mild-mannered alter ego or anything like that." I mean, you tell me you're, uh, super-mega-ultra-lightning babe? That's all right with me. I'm good. I'm good.
-
10th May 2014, 04:59 PM #24
-
10th May 2014, 06:14 PM #25GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 2,947
Girl, I don't wanna know about your mild-mannered alter ego or anything like that." I mean, you tell me you're, uh, super-mega-ultra-lightning babe? That's all right with me. I'm good. I'm good.
-
10th May 2014, 06:21 PM #26Philomath in training
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Adelaide
- Age
- 59
- Posts
- 3,148
I made it "pretty much to drawing" but found when putting a DTI in that the edge of the dial fouled the bit above the dove tail clamp. With hindsight I'd make that bit longer and then trim back once I had a DTI to check for size.
Lack of springs did not cause any aggravation. Biggest aggravation was having to make parts again because I didn't get the holes for the rods spot on parallel.
It's not a complicated or time consuming project but does need a little bit of precision.
Michael
-
10th May 2014, 07:15 PM #27GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,770
Technically speaking I think my idea was a normal DTI laid down.(though I cant find the thread)
I'm wondering with a vertical DTI the rods will be to close to the face or you'll need to use even more Z.....
Of course if it works I'm happy to take credit
No one likes the idea of stealing the fine adjust off the end of an indicator stand? you guys must have bigger workpieces than I do hehe
Stuart
-
10th May 2014, 07:26 PM #28GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 2,947
This one seems OK but looking at the way he has it set up, he must zero off some pretty large diameter holes!
http://home.earthlink.net/~bottlbob/...orSweeper2.jpg
Hey Stuart, if you bring the DTI higher to reduce Z use and it then fouls with the rods, I don't see why you couldn't keep the rods fixed at the DTI end and instead have them slide through where they attach at the spindle end?
Edit: fixed up the link.
It would also be more balanced for when spinning the setup at 500 rpm
SimonGirl, I don't wanna know about your mild-mannered alter ego or anything like that." I mean, you tell me you're, uh, super-mega-ultra-lightning babe? That's all right with me. I'm good. I'm good.
-
10th May 2014, 07:59 PM #29
That is my intention. I don't fancy doing the mirror routine and I've got a bit of spare cash at the moment.
I made it "pretty much to drawing" but found when putting a DTI in that the edge of the dial fouled the bit above the dove tail clamp. With hindsight I'd make that bit longer and then trim back once I had a DTI to check for size.
Lack of springs did not cause any aggravation. Biggest aggravation was having to make parts again because I didn't get the holes for the rods spot on parallel.
It's not a complicated or time consuming project but does need a little bit of precision.
Michael
Technically speaking I think my idea was a normal DTI laid down.(though I cant find the thread)
I'm wondering with a vertical DTI the rods will be to close to the face or you'll need to use even more Z.....
Of course if it works I'm happy to take credit
No one likes the idea of stealing the fine adjust off the end of an indicator stand? you guys must have bigger workpieces than I do hehe
Stuart
This one seems OK but looking at the way he has it set up, he must zero off some pretty large diameter holes!
http://home.earthlink.net/~bottlbob/...weeper2.jpgHey Stuart, if you bring the DTI higher to reduce Z use and it then fouls with the rods, I don't see why you couldn't keep the rods fixed at the DTI end and instead have them slide through where they attach at the spindle end?
It would also be more balanced for when spinning the setup at 500 rpm
Simon
I thought of having the rods work this way on initial evaluation, but this will only work for larger holes. Looking at Michaels picture, the dovetail clamp will have to be extended out further, but extra z's will only be needed when the dial is blocked by the chuck mounting block above it.
Dean
-
10th May 2014, 08:36 PM #30GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 2,947
Ah yes I see what you mean. For smaller holes you need to have the indicator facing the spindle axis, which means the rods will still be in the way. Whenever I think of changing a design, my first thought is.. there must be a reason the way it is. Someone has put a fair amount of thought into that design, certainly more thought than the 5 minutes I spent looking at the finished item!
I guess if Z use was really something you wanted to preserve, you could make the spindle attachment to fit straight into your mill spindle taper. A fair bit of stuffing around to save maybe 30mm of Z.
PS sorry about the link. I always try my links in preview before posting. Not sure why it doesn't work!
SimonGirl, I don't wanna know about your mild-mannered alter ego or anything like that." I mean, you tell me you're, uh, super-mega-ultra-lightning babe? That's all right with me. I'm good. I'm good.