Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  5
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 55
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    764

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anorak Bob View Post
    Yep. 0.125"
    Then my guess is you have a bend in your lead screw. As the lead screw turns it applies more pressure on to the side of cross slide nut on one half of a revolution than on the other half hence uneven pressure on the cutter.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    sydney
    Age
    65
    Posts
    3,564

    Default

    That question you asked and the figure given relate to the lathes leadscrew,not the crosslide screw which is a different pitch.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    764

    Default

    Sorry I should have said cross slide lead screw pitch... I would have thought they would have the same pitch so the dials would be the same????

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ballarat
    Age
    65
    Posts
    2,656

    Default A Simple Tramming Ring for the Mill.

    Wouldn't the leadscrew have just as much effect if not more than the crosslide screw??

    Phil

  5. #20
    Ueee's Avatar
    Ueee is offline Blacksmith, Cabinetmaker, Machinist, Messmaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Canberra
    Age
    40
    Posts
    4,432

    Default

    Josh beat me to it, The Mars does that too......i've never investigated as to why, but i'm pretty sure its cross screw is not bent.
    1915 17"x50" LeBlond heavy duty Lathe, 24" Queen city shaper, 1970's G Vernier FV.3.TO Universal Mill, 1958 Blohm HFS 6 surface grinder, 1942 Rivett 715 Lathe, 14"x40" Antrac Lathe, Startrite H225 Bandsaw, 1949 Hercus Camelback Drill press, 1947 Holbrook C10 Lathe.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Perth WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    5,641

    Default Not a ploughed field.

    Concerned that more lathe ills await me I set up a couple of indicators to see if I could measure the undulations. I can't. No discernible needle movement on the 1um Millimess. Doubting the Millimess I ran an unused Compac across the face with the same result. So hopefully one of you blokes can enlighten me as to the cause of the rings.

    BT
    Attached Images Attached Images

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,770

    Default

    Hi BT,
    So what was the pitch of yor cross slide screw?(I'm guessing from PC comment the cross slide isnt 0.125" pitch)


    Do you have a 1/10th" or 0.001mm DTI?
    I find Dial gauges are much less likely to show up this sort of movement unless VERY rigidly mounted.

    But lets face it.... its not going to be much.

    Stuart

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ballarat
    Age
    65
    Posts
    2,656

    Default A Simple Tramming Ring for the Mill.

    Maybe it's harmonic polishing where the tool has the finest of vibrations and so polishes the work harmonically as it is cutting.

    Phil

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    764

    Default

    If ya can't measure it with those then it's not problem..

    You might be able to measure it if you loosen off the gib and gauge the cross slide. Incidentally what is the pitch of the cross slide lead screw?

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Adelaide
    Age
    59
    Posts
    3,148

    Default

    There is a cyclic event that is tied up with the cross slide screw. Bent is probably too strong a word - as I discovered with my micrometer, a slight deviation from straightness is enough to be noticeable (I can't pick up any bend by eye). It could also be something like the bearings on the screw are mounted in or something to do with the power feed perhaps like a gear being slightly off centre (or if manual feeding, a not quite constant rotational speed)

    However either the cross slide is able to move around on its gibs (so it may be possible to reduce the marks by tightening up the gibs a little so that the carriage can't move 'sideways') or there is spring in the toolpost (if the traverse speed is not constant the load on the tool varies, allowing the tool to dig in more or less).

    Michael

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Perth WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    5,641

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stustoys View Post
    Hi BT,
    So what was the pitch of yor cross slide screw?(I'm guessing from PC comment the cross slide isnt 0.125" pitch)


    Do you have a 1/10th" or 0.001mm DTI?
    I find Dial gauges are much less likely to show up this sort of movement unless VERY rigidly mounted.

    But lets face it.... its not going to be much.

    Stuart

    007 (Large).JPG

    No movement with that either Stu. The cross slide screw is 10tpi.

    I had a fiddle with an indicator on the leadscrew of both lathes. The '69 ARL leadscrew has roughly .003" TIR about 300mm from the gearbox. The '58 lathe has double that. The indicator reading off the un-screwcut
    section of the leadscrew shows 0.0015" on the ARL and double that again on the older machine.


    020 (Large).JPG 019 (Large).JPG

    The green lathe vibrates. I haven't yet bolted it to the floor.

    BT

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,770

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anorak Bob View Post
    No movement with that either Stu.
    So not much then.

    Tempted to suggest a smaller dia stylus ball and setting the DTI up for lots of cosine error...... but really, whats the point?

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    sydney
    Age
    65
    Posts
    3,564

    Default

    The imperial Hercus should have a pitch of .100",on the crosslide screw,and 2mm on a metric machine.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    764

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anorak Bob View Post
    Mike,
    I blued up my boy's version of a surface plate and the results show a whisker of distortion. There's continuous contact around the inner surface but a couple of non contact areas opposite one another on the outside. Hopefully not enough non contact to cause a problem with the mag chuck. Fingers crossed.
    Sorry I got distracted by the concentric rings.

    If I align the non contact area the right way so that it has minimal force, and turn down the force way down on the chuck and block it out it should be ok.

    -J

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    764

    Default Video Certification

    here a link to the video

    The video is of me checking surface ground 150mmx100mmx55mm cast iron block with Mercer type 44 0.0001" dial indicator for parallel.

    No special precautions taken, just carefully cleaning and de-burring the part and the chuck before and after grinding. In fact you can see some marks left on the part by me trying to get it off the mag chuck, the flat surface wrings itself to the chuck and is damn hard to get off without sliding. So Bob, it maybe a good idea to put a couple of lifting points on so I can free it without damaging the surface finish.

    -Josh

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •