Results 1 to 12 of 12
-
14th January 2009, 04:55 PM #1SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Melbourne
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 499
Another Celebrity - Another Let Off
http://www.news.com.au/entertainment...016681,00.html
Who said crime doesn't pay especially if your a celebrity.
-
14th January 2009, 05:30 PM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Hunter Valley
- Posts
- 81
OK, she got a sweet deal, but it isn't her fault.
The presiding magistrate is notorious for excessively lenient, or severe, sentences.
Maybe she should be pensioned off!!!
-
14th January 2009, 05:57 PM #3
Let Ye who is without sin, cast the first stone....or some such.
-
15th January 2009, 03:05 AM #4GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Sydney,Australia
- Posts
- 42
Yep, the magistrate is a well known 'colourful identity' who is well known for cheerful disregard of the facts. I don't know what hold she has on the Government other than her 'ethnicity' but they really need to remove her from the bench.
-
15th January 2009, 09:03 AM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Hunter Valley
- Posts
- 81
Neatly expressed, brslee.I was wondering how to get that accross!!
All you forgot was that she has appeared in her own court!!
-
15th January 2009, 09:10 AM #6
-
15th January 2009, 12:34 PM #7SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Melbourne
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 499
Ruddigar - You obviously didn't read this bit
The 39-year-old had previously entered a guilty plea to 23 counts relating to welfare fraud of the single parent payment. Rochester was ashamed of her behaviour and had since done everything in her power to make up for the fraud, her legal counsel Robert Bromwich said yesterday in making an application that no conviction be recorded for the offences.
Personally I am sick of hearing about people getting special treatment for their crimes because they are celebrities. They should think (as we do) about the consequences of their actions BEFORE committing the crime. Remember she committed FRAUD thus enabling her to steal OUR hard earned money - taxpayer money. If she hadn't committed fraud she wouldn't be in the position she found herself in!!. In other words she brought it all on herself.
Btw Mr Watson, I have never been in trouble with any authorities for anything (criminal etc). So I do qualify to cast the first stone
-
15th January 2009, 04:41 PM #8Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Kingscliff NSW
- Posts
- 12
Yeah but they got all the money back,not like Mr A Bond etc
-
17th January 2009, 02:07 PM #9
I know some one who did the same thing many years ago and the same thing happened to them and he was no celb.
David
-
17th January 2009, 04:56 PM #10Deceased
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- ...
- Posts
- 1,460
-
17th January 2009, 08:23 PM #11
In actual fact her celebrity may well have gone against her in her being charged in the first place. For such a small amount (by comparison to most) she would have had to pay it back and maybe sanctioned by centrelink for future payments. The degree of criminality is not huge - no false identities etc....
I charged a women for $170,000.00 worth and she got 2months.....
Single mother with a child...small fraud......they wouldnt send her away.
-
17th January 2009, 08:56 PM #12SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Melbourne
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 499
Bookmarks