Results 46 to 60 of 108
Thread: has OH&S gone overboard
-
9th May 2008, 06:35 PM #46
Carl, you are most definitely in line to receive a Darwin award in the near future. Best of luck with that.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
Albert Einstein
-
9th May 2008, 06:45 PM #47
OH&S is a pain to the person doing the work, maybe. Though the older you get, usually the less you mind.
You need to remember that OH&S is there for a reason and it doesn't always have to be for the safety of the person doing the work. Most times workers are a greater risk to others than themselves.
As for cotton underpants. I truly hope you NEVER have to realise why they made this rule. Pulling clothing out of burnt skin is one of the most painful things you will ever experience.
Weisyboy, I disagree with most of what you have said about safety. If you think that you should decide what rules you will and won't accept, then the government should also be able to decide what medical treatment will be free, and if you will be entitled to a hearing pension, disability pension etc. As a taxpayer I do not want my taxes being wasted on people who will not follow some safety rules.
I admire you for wanting to get into the work, good on you, but there is more to life than the short term.
-
9th May 2008, 07:10 PM #48As for cotton underpants. I truly hope you NEVER have to realise why they made this rule. Pulling clothing out of burnt skin is one of the most painful things you will ever experience.
from the mid 80s to 1992 there was a steady increase in both the number and % of accidents involving chain saws where the worker injured was simply not seen before the accident. In 1993 the wearing of high visibility clothing was brought in for forestry workers the number and % of accidents involving unseen workers dropped dramatically to virtually nil..
www.carlweiss.com.au
Mobile Sawmilling & Logging Service
8" & 10" Lucas Mills, bobcat, 4wd tractor, 12 ton dozer, stihl saws.
-
9th May 2008, 07:59 PM #49i have recived 3rd degree burns to 20% of my body my boxer shorts were melted into my leg."I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
9th May 2008, 08:11 PM #50.
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 1,174
As long as it wasn't your middle leg
Just how did that happen Carl?
so in other words most people are now seen before being indured instead of being egnored untill they start screaming.
-
9th May 2008, 08:13 PM #51
www.carlweiss.com.au
Mobile Sawmilling & Logging Service
8" & 10" Lucas Mills, bobcat, 4wd tractor, 12 ton dozer, stihl saws.
-
9th May 2008, 09:09 PM #52.
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 1,174
Go back and look at what I wrote in my post.
"In 1993 the wearing of high visibility clothing was brought in for forestry workers the number and % of accidents involving unseen workers dropped dramatically to virtually nil.."
Do you want to an attempt at answering this one Carl?
"I assume you at least wear thongs when using a chain saw?"
[EDIT] just found a picture of carl in another thread wearing boots or joggers and ear-muffs.
Go Carl!
-
9th May 2008, 09:13 PM #53Skwair2rownd
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Dundowran Beach
- Age
- 77
- Posts
- 0
Oh&s
I think all aspects of this topic, except one, have been covered quite adequately.
That one exception is the dutyof employers, under the law, to carry out their responsibilities to their employees.
I know of several cases ( and yes they are true but I won't mention names for legal reasons) where workers' lives have been placed at risk because of flawed or non-existent oversight by bosses.
This is much more disturbing than athe arrant stupidity of those who simply will not accept good practice.
If someone doesn't care about how many limbs they have or what their life is worth that is one thing. When it effects others that is a different matter.
-
9th May 2008, 09:26 PM #54
thias dose not mean there were less acadents it just means there were less unseen workere involved cos they were sean more easily befor the acident.
i wear boots ear and muffs when milling for safety i also when i remember wear jeans because it keeps the sawdust off my legs and i can kneal more comfortably and a right glove cose the exhaust blows out on my hand and it gets a bit hot without the glove on.
www.carlweiss.com.au
Mobile Sawmilling & Logging Service
8" & 10" Lucas Mills, bobcat, 4wd tractor, 12 ton dozer, stihl saws.
-
9th May 2008, 10:50 PM #55.
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 1,174
You sire are correct - that is indeed a valid interpretation - I saw too much missing text for my own good!
i wear boots ear and muffs when milling for safety i also when i remember wear jeans because it keeps the sawdust off my legs and i can kneal more comfortably and a right glove cose the exhaust blows out on my hand and it gets a bit hot without the glove on.
BTW If you want to have working knees and back when you are double your current age you might want to think about getting your logs up off the ground a bit so you don't have to kneel or bend over.
-
9th May 2008, 11:11 PM #56
I do believe in some circumstances OH&S has gone a bit far but as has been said, it's the 'idiot factor' at work. You have to set rules for everybody that works in a particular situation.
I work in the automotive industry and the potential for injury or death is a very real one. We are required to wear eye, foot and in most places ear protection. The majority of the time injury is caused by loss of concentration. We do a lot of repetitive work and after 5-6 hours of doing the same thing you can become a little complacent and thats when things can go wrong. We've had squashed and severed fingers in places where guards were present and working correctly.
In one accident, a part became jammed in a conveyor that was guarded. Instead of hitting the E-stop and isolating the conveyor the operator prodded at the part with his finger, the part unjammed, conveyor started moving again and took his finger with it. A preventable accident.
Sure OH&S can be frustrating and at times border on insanity but in the end its all our safety at stake, wether it be you, your best mate or even your son or daughter. And thats the point.
Steven.
-
10th May 2008, 01:06 AM #57
Jeez, you just can't tell some people.
Stirlo, re the mouthguard. I know that off the shelf mouthguards are uncomfortable, but try getting one made by a dentist or dental tech. Much more comfortable and you can speak while wearing them - at least loud enough for the ref to hear you, unfortunately (DAMHIK). They're not cheap, but a lot cheaper and more convenient than false teeth or a crown.
-
10th May 2008, 01:12 AM #58
This topic has drifted from the weird and wonderful OH&S dept to personal stupidity.
Work/play with out protection is like sex without protection.
You can get away with it some times but other times can lead to some severe consequences.
-
10th May 2008, 02:42 AM #59
Personally I feel that OH&S is a necessary evil, I would be dead several times over without it at work... Im very safety orientated, there have been numerous deaths at my work in its 150yr history ranging from the stupidly preventable to the 1 in a 1,000,000 freak incident.
But I feel out in public it has gone too far in a lot of cases.
" "In 1993 the wearing of high visibility clothing was brought in for forestry workers the number and % of accidents involving unseen workers dropped dramatically to virtually nil.."
As a result we all wear bright orange overalls with reflective stripes now... not pretty but I feel and know I am a lot safer even tho we look stupid.....................................................................
-
10th May 2008, 08:32 AM #60
Talk about 'come in spinner'.
Weisyboy has been winding you lot up for days..
Bookmarks