Results 1 to 14 of 14
Thread: Notching High Span Floor Joists
-
14th April 2008, 10:49 AM #1Owner Builder
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Altona Vic
- Posts
- 66
Notching High Span Floor Joists
Hello, I hope the attached picture will explain things properly. My new extension plans specify high span floor joists, 250 X 38, attached to a 4 X 2 plate on top of double brick base walls. I need to get the finished floor level to match the floor level on the existing house, which is 45 years old and has bearers and joists. I need to keep the brick courses at the same heights as the courses on the existing house, which will have an impact on where the joists will sit. Therefore, it may be difficult to get the floor levels to match, without perhaps notching the ends of the joists (as little as possible of course). My question is, will this be acceptable? Will it pass a sub-floor inspection?
Thanks
-
14th April 2008, 03:19 PM #2
Safest option is to email manufacturer with your question, assuming you get positive response (don't see why you wouldn't) you will then have evidence to present at inspection.
If they're CHH Hyspan - http://www.chhfuturebuild.com.au/ind...ge/Contact+EWPTraba non folis arborem aestima
-
14th April 2008, 10:14 PM #3
Check with the manufacturer, but . . .
In general, high-span type joists are NOT allowed to be notched, as the cross pieces of the I-beam type construction provide the majority of the strength. A better solution may be to install joist hangers if possible, at a point low enough to match the existing flooring.Cheers,
Bob
-
15th April 2008, 01:43 AM #4
I wouldn't. Not because of any tech specs, mind... it's solely because it rings that little bell in my head.
Instead, I'd be inclined to make the piers a course or two lower and run a ledger of suitable height across them. If needed, that could be notched out instead of the joists.
- Andy Mc
-
15th April 2008, 07:41 AM #5
Bells in Head, Ringing in ears
Last edited by Ivan in Oz; 15th April 2008 at 07:43 AM. Reason: Grammar Errar ;-)
Navvi
-
15th April 2008, 07:57 AM #6Awaiting Email Confirmation
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Goulburn NSW
- Age
- 89
- Posts
- 7
Your drawing shows that the joists are clear of the brickwork, I would pack under them with fibro.
les
-
15th April 2008, 08:11 AM #7
Doesn't seem that way to my eyes, but maybe I'm wrong. The drawing looks like a regular joist, but the OP said he is using high-span type joists.
In any event, to put it another way, notching high-span joists would be against Code in the States and would not pass. Notching a regular joist would be OK if not more than 1/3 its total width.Cheers,
Bob
-
15th April 2008, 01:02 PM #8Owner Builder
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Altona Vic
- Posts
- 66
Thanks for all the suggestions. I probably confused things a little when I said high span. I don't mean modern manufactured joists like `hyspan' or `hybeam'. I wouldn't dream of notching a hybeam joist, the structural integrity of a hybeam joist would be compromised if the bottom was notched and the webbing was directly attached.
My plans specify `250 x 38 F7 unseasoned softwood floor joists @ 450ctrs, 3900 max single span'. That is why I considered notching, I wouldn't notch a posi-strut or a hybeam joist.
What I meant by high span is that the sub-floor is designed with joists that span further than your traditional bearers and joist set-up with 4 x 2 joists.
I hope that clarifies things a little!
-
15th April 2008, 02:21 PM #9
AS1684 allows D/4 (25%) max. notching at supports = maximum 62mm notch in your 250 joists.
Traba non folis arborem aestima
-
15th April 2008, 02:25 PM #10Owner Builder
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Altona Vic
- Posts
- 66
Excellent, that's great to hear, I will now know precisely how much room there is to move.
Thanks again!
-
15th April 2008, 02:28 PM #11
Zac
I'm with Skew in that I'd consider notching the brick work rather than notching the timber as doing the latter as this essentially reduces the load strength of the bearer over much of its length.
Personally, I'd skip the 4x2 totally and go with a galvanised steel bracket bolted to the brick work. Adjust the bearer to the required height using Villaboard packing and the bolt the bearer up to the bracket....and I'd think seriously about using F17 OB hardwood instead of softwood for the bearer too.Ours is not to reason why.....only to point and giggle.
-
21st April 2008, 11:38 AM #12Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Seven Hills, NSW
- Posts
- 159
If your bearers are not short spans with intense loads on them then shear will not be a problem. But in saying that, because you are using I joists it will become a problem if you notch because of the limited depth of the flange. The web of the joist will be inclined to buckle. If you have to notch I would notch the ledger.
-
21st April 2008, 12:33 PM #13Owner Builder
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Altona Vic
- Posts
- 66
As mentioned in one of the other posts, I will not actually be using I joists, instead LVLs or hardwood, ie something solid without webbing.
-
22nd April 2008, 09:42 AM #14Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Seven Hills, NSW
- Posts
- 159
Then just notch the HySpan.
Similar Threads
-
Bearers joists span tables etc
By pharmaboy2 in forum SUB FLOORINGReplies: 25Last Post: 23rd January 2008, 02:24 PM -
Bathroom Bearers and Joists Span
By metaljar in forum BATHROOM & TOILETReplies: 1Last Post: 5th January 2008, 01:01 PM -
floor joists - span length - max load
By kyra08 in forum GENERAL ODDS N SODSReplies: 1Last Post: 19th November 2007, 09:05 PM
Bookmarks