Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Motorbike rego

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    geelong
    Posts
    59

    Default Motorbike rego

    I want to get an old triumph back on the road and went to the vicroads website and used their fee calculator and it says it will cost me about $850 to get it re rego'ed !!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT !!!!!!!
    Do they wear balaclavas or what?!! Not happy jan.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Osaka
    Posts
    346

    Default

    Move to Queensland...my renewal just came in - $385 for the year, 2 seat rego
    Semtex fixes all

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    13

    Default

    $850 is steep. I'd call them up to confirm this.

  4. #4
    Calm's Avatar
    Calm is offline Stubby Owner and proud of it. Now coming back to Earth.:D
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Niddrie, Victoria
    Age
    68
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Did that include stamp duty, transfer fee, plates and rego? Did you previously have the bike registered in your name? If so you shouldnt have toi pay stampduty and transfer fees again.
    Stamp duty is $40 per $1000 value or $8 per $200 or part there of.
    Then you would have number plates, third party insurance and registration.

    It would probably add up to around that for a first up rego.

    The bike i just bought (rego paid) cost the previous owner $500 because of the postcode he was in.
    regards

    David


    "Tell him he's dreamin."
    "How's the serenity" (from "The Castle")

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 1999
    Location
    Westleigh, Sydney
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,332

    Default

    Motor bike rego is a rip off. Cost of wear & tear to the roads is proportional (roughly) to the 5th power of the mass of the vehicle. So if a motor bike + pax weighs a quarter of the car + pax, the wear & tear it causes is 1/256 of the car.

    The same rip off applied with 3rd party insurance. Sure motor bikes have more accidents per km, but usually only the rider is injured, and most do many fewer kms than cars. The insurance companies will not publish their actuarial tables to support their thievery, and AFIK, no government has had the guts to compel them to.
    Visit my website
    Website
    Facebook

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AlexS View Post
    Motor bike rego is a rip off. Cost of wear & tear to the roads is proportional (roughly) to the 5th power of the mass of the vehicle. So if a motor bike + pax weighs a quarter of the car + pax, the wear & tear it causes is 1/256 of the car.

    The same rip off applied with 3rd party insurance. Sure motor bikes have more accidents per km, but usually only the rider is injured, and most do many fewer kms than cars. The insurance companies will not publish their actuarial tables to support their thievery, and AFIK, no government has had the guts to compel them to.
    you've got it wrong

    the costs are driven by the Goverment who want to price bikes off the road.
    the road safety experts I know all say "if bikes were invented today, we would not allow them on the roads 'cause their too dangerous"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    geelong
    Posts
    59

    Default

    The bike was registered in my dads name about 6-7 years ago, which is when he died (not from the bike). I guess my mum became the owner but didnt re register it. It had personalised plates so she paid extra to keep them. So now i want to restister in my name using the personalised plates. I tried twice yesterday to ring vicroads but after about 10 min on hold i gave up.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mako View Post
    The bike was registered in my dads name about 6-7 years ago, which is when he died (not from the bike). I guess my mum became the owner but didnt re register it. It had personalised plates so she paid extra to keep them. So now i want to restister in my name using the personalised plates.
    there's your problem. The personalised plates. Are far as VicRoads is concerned it's "come in spinner"

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    East Warburton, Vic
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,541

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mako View Post
    The bike was registered in my dads name about 6-7 years ago, which is when he died (not from the bike). I guess my mum became the owner but didnt re register it. It had personalised plates so she paid extra to keep them. So now i want to restister in my name using the personalised plates. I tried twice yesterday to ring vicroads but after about 10 min on hold i gave up.
    Even if the bike was registered in your Dads name, I am pretty sure you still have to pay Stamp Duty and Transfer fee to register it in your name because you're transferring ownership and there is no way around this, I have tried to to do something similar when changing the name on my old ute, I closed my company down and needed to put the ute in my name as it was in the Company name and even thought I was the Director and owner of said company, I still had to pay stamp duty and transfer fees.

    And yeah, you'll need to supply a roadworthy certificate as well.

    Quote Originally Posted by ian View Post
    there's your problem. The personalised plates. Are far as VicRoads is concerned it's "come in spinner"
    That shouldn't have any bearing on it Ian, as mako says, his Mum has paid to keep them so I wouldn't think that you have to pay for them again.
    Cheers

    DJ


    ADMIN

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 1999
    Location
    Westleigh, Sydney
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,332

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ian View Post
    you've got it wrong

    the costs are driven by the Goverment who want to price bikes off the road.
    the road safety experts I know all say "if bikes were invented today, we would not allow them on the roads 'cause their too dangerous"
    I think we both have it right, Ian
    Visit my website
    Website
    Facebook

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •