Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Bowral, NSW, Australia
    Age
    74
    Posts
    28

    Default I have posted too many pics!

    I tried posting a pic today and was told I could not because it would exceed my limit. (Perhaps I've missed a post somewhere explaining this.) So, after deleting pics that I've posted over the past 2 years, I was successful in posting my pic today.

    Problem is that people who follow a thread that maybe 6 months old and read about making a splined box want to look at the pictures that are referred to in the post. The guy who posted them has to remove them if he wants to post any more pictures.

    Perhaps there is a cost involved in 'leaving' pictures there but surely some of the classic threads like 'How to restore a plane' and step by step instructions on building a chest of drawers deserve to remain in the archives.

    Anyone else feel the same way?

    Carry Pine

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Oberon, NSW
    Age
    64
    Posts
    0

    Default

    ??

    I vaguely remember asking a while back if there was a limit on the pix and the PTB's told me "no." I sincerely hope that this isn't another thing that's changed with recent upgrades.

    Any idea what sort of number/overall Kb's of ULs you had before you started pruning?
    I may be weird, but I'm saving up to become eccentric.

    - Andy Mc

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Bowral, NSW, Australia
    Age
    74
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Skew,

    At the moment it says that i am using 888 KB to save 16 uploaded thingos and i can't load any more. I always do the right thing and downsize the piccies.
    I would like to think that even I have more than 16 interesting pictures that could be shared.

    CP

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    East Warburton, Vic
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,542

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carry Pine View Post
    Skew,

    At the moment it says that i am using 888 KB to save 16 uploaded thingos and i can't load any more. I always do the right thing and downsize the piccies.
    I would like to think that even I have more than 16 interesting pictures that could be shared.

    CP
    That can't be right , this is copied straight from my attachments page;
    You are currently using 25.19 MB to store 409 uploaded attachments.
    Cheers

    DJ


    ADMIN

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cheltenham, Melbourne
    Age
    75
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Mine says "You are currently using 3.52 MB to store 80 uploaded attachments.", which would appear to be about right.
    Chris
    ========================================

    Life isn't always fair

    ....................but it's better than the alternative.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Oberon, NSW
    Age
    64
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by djstimber View Post
    That can't be right , this is copied straight from my attachments page;

    You are currently using 25.19 MB to store 409 uploaded attachments.
    Mine:
    You are currently using 16.37 MB to store 499 uploaded attachments.
    You really oughtta start cropping your pix! And you'll notice that Carry is using only 808Kb for 16? Them figures are about right.

    But it looks like something is wrong with your setup somewhere, Carry... have a mod or "someone in the know" contacted you about it yet?

    Might be time to make like a squeaky wheel? First I'd check it again, though - just to make sure they haven't slipped a "stealth fix" in on you while you weren't looking... )
    I may be weird, but I'm saving up to become eccentric.

    - Andy Mc

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Eden Hills, South Australia
    Age
    63
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Mine:

    You are currently using 58.50 MB to store 1,152 uploaded attachments.
    My oldest pic is still there (going back to June 2005). Something screwy somewhere. To avoid certain scams, if you post too quickly you have to wait a little while. Only 1 post allowed every minute. That's the only barrier I've ever run into.
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them . . . well, I have others.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Bowral, NSW, Australia
    Age
    74
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skew ChiDAMN!! View Post
    Mine:

    You really oughtta start cropping your pix! And you'll notice that Carry is using only 808Kb for 16? Them figures are about right.

    But it looks like something is wrong with your setup somewhere, Carry... have a mod or "someone in the know" contacted you about it yet?
    I've only ever contacted Neil about the Forum and the Orange Caped One about my Triton. If anyone is out there, please have a look at my setup. Checking this morning: 888KB (for 16 uploaded items)

    It is good to know there is no limit because those posts on fixing up old hand planes are priceless. They should stay forever.

    Cheers,

    Carry Pine

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Minbun, FNQ, Australia
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Here is mine.
    You are currently using 19.34 MB to store 358 uploaded attachments.
    Cliff.
    If you find a post of mine that is missing a pic that you'd like to see, let me know & I'll see if I can find a copy.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    64
    Posts
    882

    Default

    I prefer to use Photobucket, or Imageshack for larger pics up to 1.5MB. You can post them as links, thumbnails, or full sized images in PMs, emails, or on other message boards. You can view your albums, or sub-albums as thumbnails on a single page, or on multiple pages if you have a lot of photos stored.
    They're both free, but with Imageshack you don't even have to sign up if you don't need to keep track of what you've posted. Just upload a pic, and you've got the option of a direct link, a thumbnail link, or the full image.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Minbun, FNQ, Australia
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1

    Default

    The problem with linking to off-site pictures is that they may move or change address & then the post on this board no longer displays the pictures.

    There are a few threads in 'The Best of' that are now missing some of their pictures.
    Cliff.
    If you find a post of mine that is missing a pic that you'd like to see, let me know & I'll see if I can find a copy.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    64
    Posts
    882

    Default

    Yeh, that is a downside but Photobucket and Imageshack are pretty big and they've been around for a while now so I don't think they'll fold.
    If an image has disappeared, then it has more than likely been hosted on the posters own webspace which they've since shut down.
    Perhaps I'm being selfish, but I like the way you can manage your albums, and post huge pics without having to resize them if you want. You can also make private albums, or post a link to an entire album or sub-album containing lots of pics on a particular project.


  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Pakenham, outer Melb SE suburb, Vic
    Age
    55
    Posts
    549

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cliff Rogers View Post
    The problem with linking to off-site pictures is that they may move or change address & then the post on this board no longer displays the pictures.

    There are a few threads in 'The Best of' that are now missing some of their pictures.

    Totally agree with Cliff's point, it is a real shame that some valuable pics are now missing & a fair number of threads are the poorer for it.

    'Tis indeed a pain to resize & reduce pics to upload, but it is a worthwhile contribution to the quality of the forums and is appreciated by many.


    Carry, bit of a busy time for the admin team but your prob has been noted & will be addressed as soon as possible.


    Cheers..................Sean


    The beatings will continue until morale improves.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Bowral, NSW, Australia
    Age
    74
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chrisb691 View Post
    Mine says "You are currently using 3.52 MB to store 80 uploaded attachments.", which would appear to be about right.
    Yes but you aren't stopped from posting any more piccies.
    I get :
    You are currently using 888 KB to store 16 uploaded attachments and my red line goes across the horizontal dial only leaving a little bit of green. When I come back from hols I'll investigate further.

    Thank you for the comparison of your usage.

    Carry Pine

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cheltenham, Melbourne
    Age
    75
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carry Pine View Post
    Yes but you aren't stopped from posting any more piccies.
    I get :
    You are currently using 888 KB to store 16 uploaded attachments and my red line goes across the horizontal dial only leaving a little bit of green. When I come back from hols I'll investigate further.

    Thank you for the comparison of your usage.

    Carry Pine
    I know I'm not stopped from posting. My intent was purely to give a comparative reference.
    Chris
    ========================================

    Life isn't always fair

    ....................but it's better than the alternative.

Similar Threads

  1. trying to post pics
    By davo_scuba in forum KITCHENS, BATHROOMS, THEATRES, etc
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 8th May 2007, 11:06 AM
  2. Digital Pics from camera to PC-program wanted
    By scooter in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATION
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 14th October 2006, 05:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •