![Thanks](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/thanks.png)
![Likes](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/likes.png)
![Needs Pictures](https://www.woodworkforums.com/images/smilies/happy/photo4.gif)
![Picture(s) thanks](https://www.ubeaut.biz/wave.gif)
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: question to mod's re PM's
-
12th September 2007, 02:52 PM #1
question to mod's re PM's
Hiya,
I must admit i havnt been on too much as have been busy and spend most of my drivel time swearing on Grunt's new board....
My question is i seem to have been restricted to 1 message recipient and tiomeout of 240 sec's for PM Parameters. Is this now standard changed from 5 recipients and 60 second timeout ? am i a pariah ?new standard ?
Im happy either way but I was asked a question and referred the quetionoer to another user and had to send sep message to the referee so he wouldnt get a broadside...
cheers tho!
ZeddyZed
-
12th September 2007, 03:05 PM #2I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
My Other Toys
-
12th September 2007, 03:31 PM #3
-
12th September 2007, 03:55 PM #4
well that sucks but so be it!
Zed
-
12th September 2007, 04:06 PM #5
Must admit that the 4 mins or 240secs between messages is a PITA! When you log on and have to reply to several messages it gets me every time
Gives me a laugh though "You may send messages to 1 people at the time. Multiple names to be separated by ;"
-
12th September 2007, 11:34 PM #6
If people did the right thing then there would be no need for such problems. But as always, a very small minority spoil it for everyone else.
56 Rock n Roll rebel....... Too old to die young and too young to be an old fart. Guess I'll just keep on rockin' and refuse to grow old gracefully.
Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. It's free and only takes 37 seconds!