The Code of Practice

**Driver** · 31st July 2007, 11:03 PM

Brother HB, you have the right of it!

Wendy, I reckon Bob has not only provided you with an excellent Get Out of Jail Free card but has pointed out , yet again, that The Code is sufficiently robust to meet and deal with any situation that can arise in the shed.

Good result all round, I think.

Well done, Bob.

Col the Congratulatory

**RufflyRustic** · 1st August 2007, 09:47 AM

Whew!!!!!

Thanks Guys!!

**dadpad** · 4th August 2007, 03:27 PM

Originally Posted by rufflyrustic

Carn Guys - but they're there to keep prying eyes out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Surely under shed security they'd be allowed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mumble, mumble.......

I vote definitly no.

A proper sheds windows would be covered with enough dirt grime and dust that no - one would be able to see in. In addition this situation creates an opportunity for a projectand the purchase of a new tool!

How so?

You need to replace the glass in your windows with opaque. Of course you wont be able to find the damn glass cutter so you will have to buy a new one.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have a friend in Canada who is a little concerned he may have gotten a dose of girl cooties (germs) by drinking milk from his significant other's glass.

I suggested he take the quiz (Appendix B of THE CODE) in order to check.
In my opinion Canadians are a lot like Ozzyuns..... (just kept in the fridge for later on) so it prolly wont matter all that much.

Q1. Can a furriner qualify for blokelyness assuming he is still living in his native country.?

**Cliff Rogers** · 4th August 2007, 03:42 PM

Originally Posted by dadpad

...A proper sheds windows would be covered with enough dirt grime and dust ...

and cobwebs, mould, splattered oil, wax, paint, blood, mud......

**Honorary Bloke** · 4th August 2007, 11:28 PM

Originally Posted by dadpad

Q1. Can a furriner qualify for blokelyness assuming he is still living in his native country.?

Yes.

For further edification, please check Posts 202 and 203 in this thread. Plus, my user name.

**Wild Dingo** · 6th August 2007, 04:41 PM

And now 25 pages later

...do we have a DEFINITIVE cod of practice for the shed yet or is it still a "work in progress"?

Im thinking of making it up into a document laminating it and then make a nice frame for it... then hang it PROMINENTLY in the shed

note... appropriate sections HIGHLIGHTED of course

And Wendy? Your alternative name calling of the curtains in your sheds cannot and will not fool anyone!!! They are what yous sheilas call

CURTAINS!!

and are therefore a violation of the code... please remove them forthwith or else one of the nearby brethren of the code will have to take steps to resolve said violation

an if theyre too flamin scared of boofheaded spanner I will have to work a way around our distance issues and take you to task meself!

**Skew ChiDAMN!!** · 6th August 2007, 05:00 PM

Definitive? Hmmm...

Well... so far a few questions have been thrown into the ring and The Code has come through unscathed. Sooner or later someone will ask a real poser that may require a redefinition, but until then...

**RufflyRustic** · 6th August 2007, 05:14 PM

...until then or when Wild Dingo visits my domain, I shall continue building up a more appropriate window dressing such as Cliff suggested

Until then, those hanging things will just have to stay

cheers
Wendy

**Black Ned** · 6th August 2007, 05:21 PM

Is there any differences allowed to distinguish between a Blokes Shed and a Sheila's Shed?
Can sheila's have a official shed?
If all things must be Blokey, then is Wendy classified as a sheila, or an honorary bloke?
And is Bob Childress a sheila posing as a bloke.

**Gra** · 6th August 2007, 05:31 PM

Originally Posted by Linden Hardy

Is there any differences allowed to distinguish between a Blokes Shed and a Sheila's Shed?
Can sheila's have a official shed?
If all things must be Blokey, then is Wendy classified as a sheila, or an honorary bloke?
And is Bob Childress a sheila posing as a bloke.

I believe the code states that a bloke doesnt have to be a particular gender, they just have to meet certain criteria? Am I wrong

**NCArcher** · 6th August 2007, 05:32 PM

Originally Posted by Wild Dingo

Im thinking of making it up into a document laminating it and then make a nice frame for it... then hang it PROMINENTLY in the shed

Just so you know Dingo, The Code is now 30 pages long.
It's going to be one big @rse frame featuring very PROMINENTLY in the shed.

**Gra** · 6th August 2007, 05:33 PM

Originally Posted by NCArcher

Just so you know Dingo, The Code is now 30 pages long.
It's going to be one big @rse frame featuring very PROMINENTLY in the shed.

One word... Wall Paper

**Skew ChiDAMN!!** · 6th August 2007, 05:37 PM

From memory, Wendy started compiling a Sheila's Code of Practice, but decided that The Code was sufficient, with reversals of gender where applicable.

I'm not sure whether this is mentioned in The Code, it has been a while since I checked

but if it isn't, perhaps it should be? Then again, mebbe not... AFAICT wood and tools don't care what the gender of the person they're biting is.

And while I'm asking... what's the latest revision? The latest I have on HDD is 21 June 06...

**silentC** · 6th August 2007, 05:37 PM

One word... Wall Paper

That's two words, but let's not split hairs. I'm still waiting to see the DEFINITIVE cod of practice. Sounds a bit fishy to me...

**NCArcher** · 6th August 2007, 05:52 PM

Originally Posted by Skew ChiDAMN!!

And while I'm asking... what's the latest revision? The latest I have on HDD is 21 June 06...

Post 326, page 22. Version 7 Feb'07

Thread: The Code of Practice

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Confused?

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions