Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Broken Hill
    Posts
    0

    Default Liability for safety. . ?

    Just reading in another forum about who is liable (ie sue-able) if somebody borrows another's tools. . .
    It said this bloke borrowed a ladder from his mate - the ladder broke and the bloke was injured and the bloke SUCCESSFULLY sued his mate. . . Happened in the UK - so UK law applies. . .
    Reason I'm posting:
    The lad next door to us has recently been put-on as an apprentice carpenter. . . So his mum says - Can he come over and see (?use) your tools (he's never seen them - but his dad has). . .
    If I let him use them - and he chops something off (like the banker!!) just who is liable. . ?? (I live in NSW).
    Jedo

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Garvoc VIC AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    3,208

    Default

    probably you as the owner of the tools.
    Regards, Bob Thomas

    www.wombatsawmill.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Broken Hill
    Posts
    0

    Default Me. . ?

    So. . . best if I don't let him use any of my tools then. . ?
    Am I covered by house insurance?
    public liability insurance?
    Any insurance?
    Jedo

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    65
    Posts
    1,248

    Default

    NSW work cover laws are vicous! but you have to be realistic, explain the liability with the Mum and the kid and teach him how to safely use the tools IE get them to accept liability if anything happens.

    If you have the slightest gut feeling about the lack of morals of the family tell them sorry can't do.
    Last edited by RETIRED; 25th March 2007 at 03:09 PM. Reason: Removing "s" from vicious

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Near Bodgy, AlexS, Wongo & CraigB
    Age
    19
    Posts
    744

    Default

    tell him no, if hes gunna be an apprentice hes gunna learn anyway. besides buggering your tools he could hurt himself - liability aside.

    I reckon that so long as you maintain a clean safe envoriment and have not modified any tools he uses you'd be ok. be safe - get him to sign a waiver first if u must let him use your gear.

    or take them at face value; let him "see" your tools. Only.
    Zed

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    313

    Default

    I'd be tellng the Mum that her son will be getting proper instruction on safe tool use as part of his apprentishap, and you don't want to lead him astray.
    Should keep you in the good books.
    Cheers,
    Clinton

    "Use your third eye" - Watson

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/clinton_findlay/

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Northen Rivers NSW
    Age
    58
    Posts
    758

    Default

    These litigation stories that get passed around normally dont include the facts supporting the story.

    Let him come over, show him the tools and how they work just like you would your own child if you have one.


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    ...
    Posts
    1,460

    Default

    A very difficult issue and is governed by state laws which may well be differed in different states.

    Generally speaking the homeowner/occupier is responsible if an accident occurs through his negligence.

    Not knowing if a person allowed to use your workshop can handle all the tools therein safely, not just those that you specify, would probably be interpreted by a jury as negligent. As a juror I definitely would.

    Getting signed waivers to abrogate your liability is against the law and of no effect but that fact would count heavily against you in any court action.

    In other words teach and supervise but do not allow unsupervised access.


    Peter.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Broken Hill
    Posts
    0

    Default thanks

    all info taken on board. . .
    the lad is welcome over to see the tools, watch a demo. But him and his mum now know that I wouldn't want to lead him astray with any bad infoand that he will get all the good oil from his boss and colleagues at work. Plus - I'm not covered for workcover...

    thanks to all
    Jedo

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,174

    Default

    I have a similar dilemma with a 13 year old nephew who is dead keen to work in my shed. I was thinking of explaining to him and his parents that it is a very dangerous environment and that he can watch and use a few hand tools under supervision to start with. If he sticks to the hand tools long and diligently enough, we'll look at upgrading his access sometime in the future.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Mt Druitt NSW
    Age
    65
    Posts
    139

    Default

    On the issues of litigation there are many considerations to be made.

    In the case of the borrowed ladder:
    • Was the owner aware of any faults or conditions and if this was the case then a failure of duty of care (DoC) would apply.
    • Did the owner of the ladder properly inspect the ladder before use or issue to someone else. Again this is a failure in DoC.
    • Did the owner instruct the borrower in the correct procedure for use of the ladder or determine that the user was already trained in the use of the ladder - you guessed it failure in DoC.
    • And if all above was carried out and fails to prove there was negligence, was the owner an accredited instructor in providing instruction to the borrower in the use of the ladder.
    The industrial laws that apply in most modern countries Australia, New Zealand, USA, UK, Germany etc are generally all based around the same principles in Duty of Care. This is why the laws are so airy fairy and seem to be without content or detailled description. So that they can be applied to an infinite number of variations and somebody be it an individual or corporation can be held responsible for damages.

    In your case with the kid next door, it would be almost irrelevant what you did, in the event of an accident involving a serious injury you are liable to be sued. There is no defence that can applied.
    ______________
    Mark
    They only call it a rort if they're not in on it

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2

    Default horses for courses

    Quote Originally Posted by Bleedin Thumb View Post
    NSW work cover laws are vicous! but you have to be realistic, explain the liability with the Mum and the kid and teach him how to safely use the tools IE get them to accept liability if anything happens.

    If you have the slightest gut feeling about the lack of morals of the family tell them sorry can't do.
    Please tell me what sort of courses you run... or do you mean coarse, as in not nice and civil ? Sorry, I'm a teacher and a bit of a tease/ taker. No offence, love you posts ! Agree totally about checking out the kind of family - you have to be more and more careful these days, as parents don't think twice about turning on anyone who's "responsible" for their children, forgetting that some situations only develop or get out of control because the children have been badly brought up.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Redlands area, Brisbane
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sturdee View Post
    A very difficult issue and is governed by state laws which may well be differed in different states.
    I haven't bothered to search for this case as there isn't enough information to go on. Furthermore, I am not a lawyer, so with that disclaimer...

    I doubt that this was a prosecution by a WHS authority. This sounds like a Common Law suit which means that in principle it will probably apply here.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sturdee View Post
    Getting signed waivers to abrogate your liability is against the law and of no effect but that fact would count heavily against you in any court action.
    They're ineffective as legal devices. I don't know whether there are negative implications.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sturdee View Post
    In other words teach and supervise but do not allow unsupervised access.
    Frankly, I wouldn't even do that. It isn't worth the risk.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    ...
    Posts
    1,460

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by markharrison View Post
    They're ineffective as legal devices. I don't know whether there are negative implications.
    The negative implications are in relation to the amount of damages a jury may award in such a case.

    If a jury is aware that you knew your liability and tried to twart that by getting waivers I feel certain that the damage award would be much higher than otherwise. It would certainly influence me if I was a juror on such a case.


    Peter.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •