Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    brissy
    Age
    55
    Posts
    29

    Default staggered nails essential on decking fixed to hwd joists?

    very hard to get neat straight lines with the staggered pattern. surely the old straight line nailing will not split the joist and can be relied upon to hold the decking down well with sensible pre drilling usuing hand driven screw shank gals?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by russ34 View Post
    very hard to get neat straight lines with the staggered pattern. surely the old straight line nailing will not split the joist and can be relied upon to hold the decking down well with sensible pre drilling usuing hand driven screw shank gals?

    I got a piece of ply-wood and used it as a template to pre-drill. Perfect nail placement every time.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    65
    Posts
    1,248

    Default

    I always use a straight line, I had never thought about staggering the nails - which probably makes sense but I tend to use Treated Pine joists that probably are less likely to split than seasoned HW.
    Come to think about it I have never seen nails staggered as you describe.

    You learn something new everyday.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Barboursville, Virginia USA
    Age
    77
    Posts
    549

    Default

    I'm with Bleedin' on this one, staggered nails would look like shyte.
    Cheers,

    Bob



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Tallahassee FL USA
    Age
    82
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Straight down the middle would be less likely to blow out one side, and most likely far enough apart to prevent interaction anyway.

    Joe
    Of course truth is stranger than fiction.
    Fiction has to make sense. - Mark Twain

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Honorary Bloke View Post
    I'm with Bleedin' on this one, staggered nails would look like shyte.

    I beg to differ. I did staggered nails, and I think it looks great, and it makes it less likely that the joist will split in the future.


    You end up with a pattern like this:
    .

    .
    .
    .

    Then on the joins you get:

    . .


    . .
    And if you make the template the same width as your joist, it is impossible to split the edge.

    I can't get the spacing right, but I hope you get the general idea. If not, I will do a better example and attached it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    65
    Posts
    1,248

    Default

    Spelunx, Are you only placing one nail per decking board as it crosses a joist ?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    In answer to the question "are they essential" the answer is clearly "no they are not". Whether you do or not is up to you.

    Personally, I've never seen it done that way, but then I don't usually walk around with my nose glued to the ground (although it's surprising what you pick up if you do). I think I'd rather have my nails in the middle of the joist than too near the edge because, unless the grain is consistently straight, you could end up splitting off to the side.

    I follow the theory, in that having the nails in line can introduce a split, but you can't really get away from having nails in line, all you are doing is doubling the distance between them.

    In any case, if you pre-drill, then you really shouldn't have a problem.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bleedin Thumb View Post
    Spelunx, Are you only placing one nail per decking board as it crosses a joist ?
    No. I am crap at drawing, but hey, I'll do my best!!


    The first picture represents the mid-deck nailing pattern, ie two nails, spaced roughly 15-20mm apart, using 60mm+ joists. So down the joist, you get:
    .

    .
    .
    .

    and so one. (picture the above as two decking boards going horizontally)


    The ends, I used the same template, just turned it over after pre-drilling the first two holes, so the nails stayed the same distance apart.
    . .


    . .

    Picture the above nailing pattern with two boards butt-joined against each other.

    I hope this makes sense!


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    758

    Default

    I've seen plenty of decks nailed straight and the joists have split, it's like driving a wedge into the timber. You can nail in a straight line if you skew each nail in alternate directions so it effectively takes two different lines into the joist.

    Cheers
    Michael

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    65
    Posts
    1,248

    Default

    Thanks Spelunx I get the drift, but the stagger on 65mm decking over a 50mm joist would be so minimal that I think the perceived advantage would be out weighed by the untidiness of having two lines.

    Also how you nail your boards when they butt join would be a break in the pattern and have the effect of drawing your eye to the join which IMHO is undesirable.

    Have said all that, it all comes down to personal taste so if someone wants to stagger their nails go for it.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bleedin Thumb View Post
    Thanks Spelunx I get the drift, but the stagger on 65mm decking over a 50mm joist would be so minimal that I think the perceived advantage would be out weighed by the untidiness of having two lines.

    Also how you nail your boards when they butt join would be a break in the pattern and have the effect of drawing your eye to the join which IMHO is undesirable.

    Have said all that, it all comes down to personal taste so if someone wants to stagger their nails go for it.
    Having spent the past couple of years gradually demolishing and
    reconstructing a poorly built deck, I offer my $0.02 worth...

    The original nails were in-line (and had too-small heads). They were
    rusted even though originally gal and installed a mere 10 years
    before. The old hardwood joists were indeed very badly split by having
    the nails in-line. I.e: the splits were nail-to-nail, often extending quite a
    long way along the joist - following the nailing line. I daresay it would have
    been better if the holes had been pre-drilled rather than simply gunned,
    but I guess the previous owner was looking for the cheapest price.
    This was all made a lot worse by not having any kind of protection
    along the top of the joists (flashing, or that newer moulded plastic
    cover stuff). That meant rainwater could remain for long periods
    down in the splits, rotting the timber much too quickly. All in all, the
    joists were in really bad shape, compared to some other bits (23 yrs old!)
    which did indeed have flashing on top - those had no rot or other
    degradation whatsoever along the top. I discarded the old rotted
    joists as firewood.

    The new deck uses turpentine decking over tallowwood joists, secured
    by staggered stainless steel screws (i.e: everything is pre-drilled,
    counterbored, and countersunk). I used a template (as someone else
    mentioned) to place the screwholes in exactly the same positions along
    each joist. It looks fine, even more so as successive coats of decking oil
    gradually de-emphasize the screws relative to the boards.

    On a 45mm joist, staggering the screws about 5mm off-centre gives
    10mm spacing between screws, which is enough, yet still
    keeps them a long way in from the side of the joist. Also, using a
    slight inward dovetailing (about 5 deg off the vertical), means that the
    bottoms of the screws go even further into the joist. The dovetailing is
    unnoticeable on the deck surface.

    Regarding the ends of boards: careful pre-drilling and counterboring
    is essential. A slightly stronger dovetailing can be used to place the top of the
    screw a bit further in along the board, but still grip a substantial amount of
    joist below. It's also important not to over-tighten the end-board screws,
    as I found out the hard way.

    HTH.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    ACT
    Posts
    102

    Default

    I staggered the nails as I was old it would reduce joist splitting but I really dont know if it would make that much diffence, anyway I must say I like the look of it so im happy, here is a link to a picture of mine.
    http://www.woodworkforums.ubeaut.com...ad.php?t=46016

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Straight nailing is pretty much the done thing today with treated joists
    A because customers won't accept staggered
    B treated pine doesn't split like Hardwood
    C straight is quicker and therefore cheaper
    D when people started staggered they were using 50mm bullet head nails and not todays dektites

    www.dialadeck.com.au


    utemad

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Melbourne Victoria
    Posts
    0

    Default

    As with Strangerep i replaced an old deck of hardwood on hard wood joists, about 20 years old. It was straight nailed and the timber had split.

    on the new deck i used staggered. one reason was that the new joists (TP) were not butt jointed over the bearer but overlapped beside each other, just to be extra safe. that was because of the 4 metre span and being about 2.5 metres above the ground. That way the change in line is not as noticable as a straight line of nails would be.

    It's amazing though how many people have noticed the staggered nails.


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 1st February 2007, 02:21 PM
  2. Fixing decking without nails
    By namtrak in forum DECKING
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 28th November 2006, 06:27 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •