![Thanks](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/thanks.png)
![Likes](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/likes.png)
![Needs Pictures](https://www.woodworkforums.com/images/smilies/happy/photo4.gif)
![Picture(s) thanks](https://www.ubeaut.biz/wave.gif)
Results 16 to 21 of 21
Thread: Shane Warne - comeback
-
23rd February 2007, 02:07 PM #16
I was thinking about Warnie.
Last time we had a discussion about him, it was said that he was the greatest bowler ever even though his averages don't suggest that. This was OK, because he's a spinner. It was also said that he takes the wickets of tail-enders and that was the sign of a great bowler.
So let me get this straight. Shane Warne is the Greatest Ever Bowler even though he takes more balls, concedes more run and takes wicket against weaker batsman than Lillee, Hadlee, McGrath or Ambrose?Photo Gallery
-
23rd February 2007, 03:06 PM #17
.
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 2,978
-
23rd February 2007, 03:15 PM #18
Let me rephrase that,
than the wickets of top order batsmen that Lillee, etc. would constantly take.
Are you saying that McGrath is a crap batsman?Photo Gallery
-
23rd February 2007, 03:40 PM #19
he is better than I am.
p.t.c
-
23rd February 2007, 03:59 PM #20
GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Queensland
- Posts
- 2,137
-
23rd February 2007, 06:36 PM #21