Page 22 of 31 FirstFirst ... 121718192021222324252627 ... LastLast
Results 316 to 330 of 458
  1. #316
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Minbun, FNQ, Australia
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 11011100 View Post
    ...Anyone recommend a good Aussie wine? (red of course)?
    Yeap, the only sort.

    Nuh, seriously, I picked up a 2002 Cockfighter's Ghost Langhorne Creek Cab Sav for $20 & it was damned good for the price.
    They also have a good Cab Merlot, a Shiraz &, if there is nothing else left, they have a very good unwooded chard. (see 8.3.7, or you can always say you bought it to impress a shiela. )

    PS. Hang her to the wall like a poster, even if she isn't wearing green shoes.
    Cliff.
    If you find a post of mine that is missing a pic that you'd like to see, let me know & I'll see if I can find a copy.

  2. #317
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Age
    77
    Posts
    884

    Default

    OK - it's time to issue an update of The Code.

    In another thread (see: https://www.woodworkforums.com/showthread.php?p=448153) Dennis Millard posted a very good poem about sheds and woodworking. It was so good, in fact, that it really should be included within The Code. Anyway, Dennis has kindly given his permission and so "History In The Shed" is now Appendix D.

    On a completely unrelated subject, it has been troubling the present writer for some while that DanP, that worthy walloper from country Victoria, saw it as an issue that the expression "life partner" was used to some extent throughout early versions of The Code. He felt - quite strongly - that the correct expression should be SWMBO. On lengthy consideration I have come to the conclusion that DanP is correct. SWMBO is the term of choice on these venerable forums so SWMBO it should be in The Code. The required changes have been made. Thanks, Dan.

    The Drafting Committee has also taken the opportunity to make some necessary changes to various inaccurate cross-references throughout the text and to correct a couple of typos and one piece of inaccurate grammar.

    If anyone spots any other errors they can either post a reference to the offending passage or elect to keep it to themselves. No prizes for spotting the cock-ups, just that warm glow of self-righteousness and the knowledge that you have been appropriately recognised by your peers. (Smart@rse!)

    Col
    Driver of the Forums
    Lord of the Manor of Upper Legover

  3. #318

    Default

    Is the Domino mentioned the code? It shoud be, when you consider over 17,000 have already viewed just one thread "Festoop Domino Experience...."

  4. #319
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Age
    77
    Posts
    884

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lignum View Post
    Is the Domino mentioned the code? It shoud be, when you consider over 17,000 have already viewed just one thread "Festoop Domino Experience...."
    If, Brother Lignum, you feel moved to pen a suggested amendment to The Code that specifically mentions the Domino and this meets the approval of the Drafting Committee (see page 29 of the latest updated version of The Code), the Domino may find itself achieving a mention.
    Driver of the Forums
    Lord of the Manor of Upper Legover

  5. #320
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In the shed, Melbourne
    Age
    53
    Posts
    0

    Default

    G'day Brother Committee Member Driver,

    It has occured to me in reading the newly ammeneded Code, that under Section 5, might it be warranted to have the inclusion that blokes who may feel the need to have their shed accredited as an Accredited Shed after submitting it Shed Scientist, Director of the Australasian Institute of Backyard Studies [email protected]. See http://www.woodworkforums.ubeaut.com...ad.php?t=19202 .While not a requirment of a shed being a shed, that said blokes may proudly grunt and point towards the sticker, thus gaining recognition in their endevours from their neighbour or peer as being a bloke with a shed?
    I make things, I just take a long time.

    www.brandhouse.net.au

  6. #321
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Paradise on the Murray
    Age
    58
    Posts
    109

    Default

    Fantastic document Driver
    It should be taught in schools
    Cheers,

    Howdya

    Proudly supporting research into the therapeutic benefits of the Friday Thread

  7. #322
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Age
    77
    Posts
    884

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Waldo View Post
    G'day Brother Committee Member Driver,

    It has occured to me in reading the newly ammeneded Code, that under Section 5, might it be warranted to have the inclusion that blokes who may feel the need to have their shed accredited as an Accredited Shed after submitting it Shed Scientist, Director of the Australasian Institute of Backyard Studies [email protected]. See http://www.woodworkforums.ubeaut.com...ad.php?t=19202 .While not a requirment of a shed being a shed, that said blokes may proudly grunt and point towards the sticker, thus gaining recognition in their endevours from their neighbour or peer as being a bloke with a shed?
    G'day Brother Committee Member Waldo,

    Excellent suggestion. Shed Scientist's work should be more widely recognised and you've found a way to do it. If Shed Scientist should read this perhaps he could give us an opinion?
    Driver of the Forums
    Lord of the Manor of Upper Legover

  8. #323
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Age
    50
    Posts
    641

    Default

    Bout bluddy time.
    Is there anything easier done than said?
    - Stacky. The bottom pub, Cobram.

  9. #324
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    59
    Posts
    66

    Default

    )(

    Bloody Ripper !

    thank you all
    Thinking about mowing the lawn doesn`t get it done !

  10. #325
    ss_11000 is offline You've got to risk it to get the biscuit
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canberra
    Age
    32
    Posts
    0

    Default

    thanx all for writing such a great document
    S T I R L O

  11. #326
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Age
    77
    Posts
    884

    Default

    Following some recent correspondence on the vexed question of whether or not a bloke should loan tools to another bloke or blokes, our septic mate, Honorary Bloke, suggested that The Code needed to cover this important and potentially touchy subject. Accordingly, The Code has been updated to include a new section (para 6.5: Borrowing and lending tools - a touchy subject).

    Honorary Bloke has been added to the list of Drafting Committee members on page 30. (Thanks for the input, Bob )

    As is customary with Code updates, changes to the text have been highlighted in yellow.

    Blokes are advised to familiarise themselves with the updates so as to avoid potential Code violations.
    Driver of the Forums
    Lord of the Manor of Upper Legover

  12. #327
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Garvoc VIC AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    3,208

    Default

    Dontha reckon the C of P has got so big its become THE rule book?

    Yet the Code prohibits reading any instructions.

    So is the Code gunna fly away with the Woop Woop Bird?
    Regards, Bob Thomas

    www.wombatsawmill.com

  13. #328
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Age
    77
    Posts
    884

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by echnidna View Post
    Dontha reckon the C of P has got so big its become THE rule book?

    Yet the Code prohibits reading any instructions.

    So is the Code gunna fly away with the Woop Woop Bird?
    Read it again, mate. It's not a manual. It's The Code.

    Quote:

    "Para 5 The Shed

    What a bloke does in his shed is up to him ...."

    If you want to make The Code fly away from your shed, that's your choice.

    However:

    Quote:

    Para 5 The Shed

    "If a bloke chooses to ignore this guidance, well, he has that right but it would be a foolish bloke who knowingly transgresses The Code and commits a violation."


    Driver of the Forums
    Lord of the Manor of Upper Legover

  14. #329
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Mansfield
    Age
    64
    Posts
    111

    Default

    Naturally my instinctive blokelyness did not allow me to actually read the whole code (i did however skim parts here and there).
    Now! There did not appear to be any mention of curtains. Obviously curtains would NOT allowed even under threat of complete withdrawl of conjiguls curtains would not be allowed but can an exemption could be granted in this case.

    The sun, in the afternoon is glaring in through the one window I have in my shed, making visibility quite difficult at my workbench. As i see it my options are:
    1. Knock off for the day and have a beer
    2. Go to the pub.
    3. Nail a couple of hessian wheat bags to the framing above the window as a temporary measure.

    Also if i go with 3. should I use flat head nails or bullet heads but only nailed halfway in and then bent over to stop the bags sliding off.

  15. #330
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    I've got the same problem in my office (which is in the back of the shed). I got an old drawer and stuck it up on the inside of the window. Problem solved in a half-arsed blokely way

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •