View Poll Results: Date or elapsed time?
- Voters
- 69. You may not vote on this poll
-
Date.
23 33.33% -
Elapsed time.
46 66.67%
Thread: Time elapsed.
-
7th September 2006, 02:07 PM #16
Yep but those old ones always showed the date, even under the new/old system. (I was waiting for that one )
"I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
7th September 2006, 02:10 PM #17Do you READ any of these posts?Photo Gallery
-
7th September 2006, 02:11 PM #18
-
7th September 2006, 02:11 PM #19Originally Posted by The Grunting One
"I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
7th September 2006, 02:26 PM #20
Why do you care?
I'd like to know how long ago something was posted if I just replied to it, and someone else has added something. If I posted 5 minutes ago, and it shows that there is something new posted one minute ago, it's not mine and might be worth retorting to. Unlikely, but it might be worthwhile.
If it says the date, then I'd actually have to read it and comprehend what it says (a rarity around these parts), whereas if it says elapsed time, then I can see quickly how long ago it was, requiring minimal reading and no comprehension.
Saves the effort of actually thinking...
-
7th September 2006, 02:33 PM #21Why do you care?
I suppose it depends on how you use the forums. When I look at New Posts, if the item interests me and it is in bold, then there have been new posts to it since I last looked and I follow the link. It seems immaterial to me whether it was made 5 minutes ago or 5 hours ago, I still either want to read it or I don't. The name of the last poster is there, so I know it wasn't me."I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
7th September 2006, 02:37 PM #22
This thread is soooooo yesterday
or should I say 24 hours ago
-
7th September 2006, 02:38 PM #23
For example:
It's bold so I know I haven't read it. It has your userid on it, so I know it wasn't me who posted it and I also know it was you, so I can decide whether or not I want to read it If I want to know how long ago it was, I don't have to refresh the screen to find out because the time is there. If I click new items and then look at it 5 minutes later (because the phone rang), all the elapsed times are out by 5 minutes. With the date and time instead, I know you posted at 1:26, regardless."I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
7th September 2006, 02:41 PM #24
I think having the actual date/time removes a problem that sometime occurs with showing elapsed time.
When two people post at almost the same time, the posts can appear out of context or repeated. If elapsed time is used then both posts will say 1 week ago and you are but if you use the actual date/time you can see that it was a posted at the same time.Photo Gallery
-
7th September 2006, 02:58 PM #25Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Murray Bridge Sth Aust
- Age
- 64
- Posts
- 5
What Lignum said.:eek:
Brenton
-
7th September 2006, 03:13 PM #26
I'm going to start posting stuff tomorrow. And read stuff posted yesterday, today. Unless what I post tomorrow is not relevant any more, and then i'll post it yesterday.
If at first you don't succeed, give something else a go. Life is far too short to waste time trying.
-
7th September 2006, 03:26 PM #27
I like the way it was before the upgrade (SC ). As others have said it's simply quicker to determine how recently the last post was made because you're reading less information, let's change it back please, I don't want to have to work while I'm skiving off.
HH.Always look on the bright side...
-
7th September 2006, 03:36 PM #28
It's changed when you view who's online as well so now I have to subtract the time of last activity from the current time to see how long it was since someone was active. This is more effort than simply reading the elapsed time before.:confused: :confused:
Love the multi quotes BTW
HH.Always look on the bright side...
-
7th September 2006, 03:40 PM #29I have to subtract the time of last activity from the current time to see how long it was since someone was active
Nope, sorry, all of your arguments are silly and I'm so much righter than you it's beyond reckoning."I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
7th September 2006, 03:50 PM #30.
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 0
Similar Threads
-
Isn't it time we had another coffee thread?
By bitingmidge in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATIONReplies: 28Last Post: 4th June 2006, 12:27 PM -
Any hints or tips for first time bikkie jointer user
By savage in forum HINTS & TIPSReplies: 16Last Post: 15th September 2005, 01:22 PM -
What is two years of your time worth?
By journeyman Mick in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATIONReplies: 26Last Post: 18th November 2004, 10:26 AM -
Daylight Saving Time
By silentC in forum POLLSReplies: 42Last Post: 22nd October 2004, 09:32 PM
Bookmarks