View Poll Results: Date or elapsed time?

Voters
69. You may not vote on this poll
  • Date.

    23 33.33%
  • Elapsed time.

    46 66.67%
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 82

Thread: Time elapsed.

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    Yep but those old ones always showed the date, even under the new/old system. (I was waiting for that one )
    "I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Romsey Victoria
    Age
    63
    Posts
    2,102

    Default

    Do you READ any of these posts?
    Not many these days. There are just too many posts to keep up with and it's become a tad sterile.
    Photo Gallery

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Age
    65
    Posts
    4,239

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silentC View Post
    Yep but those old ones always showed the date, even under the new/old system. (I was waiting for that one )
    Darn, trolled me, well hArrummphhh!

    [stomps off]

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Grunting One
    Not many these days. There are just too many posts to keep up with and it's become a tad sterile.
    Not you, I was talking to the young fella. This is just getting silly now. Just do whatever, who cares?

    "I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Japan。
    Age
    49
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silentC View Post
    Still haven't explained why you need to know how long ago the post was made...
    Why do you care?


    I'd like to know how long ago something was posted if I just replied to it, and someone else has added something. If I posted 5 minutes ago, and it shows that there is something new posted one minute ago, it's not mine and might be worth retorting to. Unlikely, but it might be worthwhile.


    If it says the date, then I'd actually have to read it and comprehend what it says (a rarity around these parts), whereas if it says elapsed time, then I can see quickly how long ago it was, requiring minimal reading and no comprehension.

    Saves the effort of actually thinking...

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    Why do you care?
    I don't particularly but obviously some people do care enough to complain about the change, so I'm curious to know how it helps to know precisely how many minutes ago a post was made.

    I suppose it depends on how you use the forums. When I look at New Posts, if the item interests me and it is in bold, then there have been new posts to it since I last looked and I follow the link. It seems immaterial to me whether it was made 5 minutes ago or 5 hours ago, I still either want to read it or I don't. The name of the last poster is there, so I know it wasn't me.
    "I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    65
    Posts
    1,248

    Default

    This thread is soooooo yesterday

    or should I say 24 hours ago

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    For example:

    It's bold so I know I haven't read it. It has your userid on it, so I know it wasn't me who posted it and I also know it was you, so I can decide whether or not I want to read it If I want to know how long ago it was, I don't have to refresh the screen to find out because the time is there. If I click new items and then look at it 5 minutes later (because the phone rang), all the elapsed times are out by 5 minutes. With the date and time instead, I know you posted at 1:26, regardless.
    "I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Romsey Victoria
    Age
    63
    Posts
    2,102

    Default

    I think having the actual date/time removes a problem that sometime occurs with showing elapsed time.

    When two people post at almost the same time, the posts can appear out of context or repeated. If elapsed time is used then both posts will say 1 week ago and you are but if you use the actual date/time you can see that it was a posted at the same time.
    Photo Gallery

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Murray Bridge Sth Aust
    Age
    64
    Posts
    5

    Default

    What Lignum said.:eek:

    Brenton

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Melbourne - Outer East Foothills
    Posts
    1,557

    Default

    I'm going to start posting stuff tomorrow. And read stuff posted yesterday, today. Unless what I post tomorrow is not relevant any more, and then i'll post it yesterday.

    If at first you don't succeed, give something else a go. Life is far too short to waste time trying.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Port Macquarie
    Age
    55
    Posts
    648

    Default

    I like the way it was before the upgrade (SC ). As others have said it's simply quicker to determine how recently the last post was made because you're reading less information, let's change it back please, I don't want to have to work while I'm skiving off.

    HH.
    Always look on the bright side...

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Port Macquarie
    Age
    55
    Posts
    648

    Default

    It's changed when you view who's online as well so now I have to subtract the time of last activity from the current time to see how long it was since someone was active. This is more effort than simply reading the elapsed time before.:confused: :confused:

    Love the multi quotes BTW

    HH.
    Always look on the bright side...

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    I have to subtract the time of last activity from the current time to see how long it was since someone was active
    Why do you even care about that?

    Nope, sorry, all of your arguments are silly and I'm so much righter than you it's beyond reckoning.
    "I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."

  15. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silentC View Post
    Why do you even care about that?

    Nope, sorry, all of your arguments are silly and I'm so much righter than you it's beyond reckoning.

    Trouble is we arnt all as intellectually brilliant as you silent and we have to take a few secs to work it all out. The old way is easier for us simple folk

Similar Threads

  1. Isn't it time we had another coffee thread?
    By bitingmidge in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATION
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 4th June 2006, 12:27 PM
  2. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 15th September 2005, 01:22 PM
  3. What is two years of your time worth?
    By journeyman Mick in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATION
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 18th November 2004, 10:26 AM
  4. Daylight Saving Time
    By silentC in forum POLLS
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 22nd October 2004, 09:32 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •