View Poll Results: Can Australia beat Brazil
- Voters
- 33. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes
16 48.48% -
No
7 21.21% -
Draw
3 9.09% -
Who cares
6 18.18% -
As long as we can have sex too.
1 3.03%
Thread: Australia v Brazil
-
14th June 2006, 10:30 AM #31
Sure can but unlikely, still we will see!
:confused: Mick Spry
-
14th June 2006, 11:32 PM #32Originally Posted by Daddles
Nearly happened in Japan/Korea.
No one in the world could be accused of being quite so arrogant and complacent as the Brazilians.
DanIs there anything easier done than said?- Stacky. The bottom pub, Cobram.
-
15th June 2006, 02:49 AM #33Originally Posted by Lignum
A little aside did you count netball or basketball when you Quoted Australias number one sport
How did you arrive that Kick and Giggle was Australias No1 sport , by the number of regestered players, the No of spectators or because you had played
Mate Aussi Rules aint No 1 and never will be , there is a whole world out there
& we will beat Brazil 2 x 1 or they will do us 2 x 1 whatever
HSAshore
The trouble with life is there's no background music.
-
19th June 2006, 08:12 PM #34.
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 0
Well 21% of us got it right I had to wait till this morning to find out the scores as i did againsed my better judgment wait up till 2am to watch, but fell asleep after the first 10 or 15 minutes. Fair dinkum its a boring game. The most excitement is with the crowd behavior and the way they chant and carry on. it would be sensational to be their. At least Geoff Ogilvy was a winner for Aus... Good on yu Geoff
-
19th June 2006, 08:20 PM #35
I'm completely stuffed now, but boy did it get exciting after the first 16 minutes!
Cheers,
P
-
19th June 2006, 08:34 PM #36Originally Posted by bitingmidge
BTW have you noticed that those that follow the world game are happy to watch AFL, RUGBy and League, yet the ones that follow those code predominantly seem threatend as soon as the Socceroos are mentioned. Personaly I'm happy for all the codes to exist in this country, though I have to admit not being a great fan of League. That is not to say that I would not watch a good game of said code. This is not a critisism (sp) just an observation.
Himzo.There's no such thing as too many Routers
-
19th June 2006, 08:48 PM #37
well, i stayed up and watched every second of the game. I only watch the World Cup every 4 years and the FA Cup final otherwise I give soccer a miss because I don't like the way they writhe around in "agony" whenever they get touched. :mad:
I thought the Socceroos did a good job against Brazil, who are after all, reigning world champs. We've come a long way under Guus Hiddink and he deserves high praise even if we go no further than the game against Croatia.
I reckon we have a real show against them though and I hope they bring Harry Kewell on earlier than they did this morning. :confused: He could have made a difference the way he played IMHO.
CAN WE BEAT CROATIA?? :confused:
YES WE CAN.If you never made a mistake, you never made anything!
-
19th June 2006, 09:07 PM #38I thought the Socceroos did a good job against Brazil, who are after all, reigning world champs. We've come a long way under Guus Hiddink and he deserves high praise even if we go no further than the game against Croatia.
Unlike you though I'm a complete tragic , and love watching the game on all levels. It's going to be hard when Fox takes over the rights in this country, no free to air games:mad:There's no such thing as too many Routers
-
19th June 2006, 09:09 PM #39.
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 0
Originally Posted by himzol
When you are born into Leauge, Union or Rules you follow collision codes that are hard, tough, fast. Its gladiatorial, physicaly pitting man againsed man in a team enviorment.
Watch the Bledisloe Cup, Legue State of Origin or the traditional rival games of Aussie Rules and you will see Football played at its vicious and skillful best. When we then watch Soccer we do appreciate the skill involved and know its the most popular sport in the world, but the lack of physical action is the complete oppisite of the other three codes and is a huge let down. That is why i find it very hard to watch as i get bored very, very quick. Its not that i feel threatend at all, i just dont see what the fuss is all about. Give me Rules, Union or Leauge any day
-
19th June 2006, 09:31 PM #40
Lignum, that is easily the biggest load of self delusional rubbish you've ever posted. Talk about proving the original theory correct
Richard
-
20th June 2006, 01:01 AM #41Originally Posted by Lignum
BTW thank you for calling me a liar. And before you deny it, here is the definition of LIE as found at http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Foru...s22lies5a.html
22. Lies
22.5a. What is a lie?
1. What is deception?
"Deception includes the range of means whereby people may be mislead. The most evident of these is lying. But it also includes withholding information which the person might find of immediate significance, as well as misleading the person into some alternative belief, or reinforcing such a belief. Then there are the more marginal forms of deception, such as evasion, euphemism and exaggeration; and the often unconscious forms of deception (without intention to mislead), such as the subtle changes of subject, the disguises, the gestures leading astray, and silence and inaction.
-
20th June 2006, 10:38 AM #42
Boban, Now youre starting to sound like a lawyer.
Lignum, those that said no are the only ones who got it wrong. The Q was CAN Aus beat Brazil. The answer is yes, they can. They did not on this occasion, but they can and have in the past. Now I'm starting to sound like a lawyer...
DanIs there anything easier done than said?- Stacky. The bottom pub, Cobram.
-
20th June 2006, 10:51 AM #43.
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 0
Originally Posted by boban
Originally Posted by boban
So which part of 22. Lies
22.5a. What is a lie? did i get wrong. The soccer web site i did, because i have never heard of the IAFC and the article was doing its best to put the code (Rules) down, so i jumped the gun and assumed it was a soccer web site. That part i got wrong
The article is over three years old and their is no way known Andrew Demitriou and the Commision would endorse such an article, so thats the part i said you mislead us with.
-
20th June 2006, 09:06 PM #44When you are born into Leauge, Union or Rules you follow collision codes that are hard, tough, fast. Its gladiatorial, physicaly pitting man againsed man in a team enviorment.
Watch the Bledisloe Cup, Legue State of Origin or the traditional rival games of Aussie Rules and you will see Football played at its vicious and skillful best.
I've already stated I'm not a great lover of league, simply don't like it.
As for Aussie rules.. see above.
As I've stated earlier I'm a football tragic, this does not mean that I can not appreciate other codes and sports. I do not think any code is inferior to others just different.
HThere's no such thing as too many Routers
-
21st June 2006, 12:31 AM #45
Like it or not I think the Socceroos will be better off without Kewell. But that’s only my opinion. We need strikers that score goals not strikers that look good.
Visit my website at www.myFineWoodWork.com
Similar Threads
-
Should Australia be a Republic?
By mario118 in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATIONReplies: 82Last Post: 9th June 2006, 02:26 PM -
Australia Gets Drunk, Wakes Up In North Atlantic
By Rodgera in forum JOKESReplies: 4Last Post: 22nd May 2006, 11:33 PM -
Australia Day - A Bit Late but worth a read
By barnsey in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATIONReplies: 6Last Post: 31st January 2005, 12:20 PM
Bookmarks