View Poll Results: Can Australia beat Brazil

Voters
33. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    16 48.48%
  • No

    7 21.21%
  • Draw

    3 9.09%
  • Who cares

    6 18.18%
  • As long as we can have sex too.

    1 3.03%
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 46
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    West Gippsland, Vic
    Age
    72
    Posts
    394

    Default Australia v Brazil

    Can we beat Brazil?
    If you never made a mistake, you never made anything!


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Lindfield N.S.W.
    Age
    63
    Posts
    1,644

    Default

    Of course the Socceroos can.
    Will they? A different question entirely.
    My vote? Unlikely - but then so are all sorts of things that actually happen.
    And the fact that it's unlikely shouldn't mean that you don't wish for it to happen.
    Cheers

    Jeremy
    If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well it were done quickly

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Only if the weather turns bad. If it's a scorcher, the heat will work against us. And if the Aussies learn to use the bloody flank a bit more! Damn! They went straight up the guts 9 times out of ten!

    At the end of the day, I'm affraid Brazil are simply out of the Socceroos league...

    Damien
    It'll scare the crap out of everyone if we manage to hold them to a draw...
    Is it wrong to be in love with a sawbench?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Lost in Space
    Age
    54
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Aussie Aussie Aussie OY OY OY!

    The great thing about sport is that who ever is the BEST on THE DAY will win. Place ya BEts were all gonna be RICH!

    REgards Lou
    Just Do The Best You Can With What You HAve At The Time

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Aberglassly,NSW
    Age
    80
    Posts
    0

    Default

    Of course we can

    Just got to play them at their own game and stick with them

    Go the Socceroos

  6. #6

    Default

    No chance. How can we be a force in that game when the majority of our elite athletes play the more exciting and skillful game of real footy that is Aussie Rules. If we were born into soccer and didnt play Aussie Rules we would already of won a world cup or two Carn the Tiges

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lignum
    No chance. How can we be a force in that game when the majority of our elite athletes play the more exciting and skillful game of real footy that is Aussie Rules. If we were born into soccer and didnt play Aussie Rules we would already of won a world cup or two Carn the Tiges
    I agree, and thought about this every time Wanganeen used to soccer those goals from impossible angles using the oval ball. Imagine if a guy like him was born into soccer.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Australia and France
    Posts
    2,869

    Default

    I didn't know Brazil had a cricket team.


    P

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Age
    50
    Posts
    641

    Default

    I said yes.

    Australia can win but probably won't. Australia has beaten an almost full strength Brazil in a friendly before and Brazil tend to be slow starters, so you never know.

    Most likely scenario, we'll be playing off with the Croats for a spot in the round of 16.

    Dan
    Is there anything easier done than said?
    - Stacky. The bottom pub, Cobram.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BobL
    I agree, and thought about this every time Wanganeen used to soccer those goals from impossible angles using the oval ball. Imagine if a guy like him was born into soccer.
    Look at Dustin Fletcher and Andrew Kellaway, both identified by the Irish media as two athletes who would walk in to any first division soccer teams as goalies. And its not only Aussie Rules, but also League and Union. . All the soccer nations have it as their primary game. How would Nathan Brown or Criss Judd go:eek: And the indigenous boys, how would they go? they would be absolute stars. Bob as your from the West youve no doubt seen them in junior games and its basicly keepings off will stunning natural evasion. To much talent in this country not playing soccer for us to be realy any good unfourtunatly.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    West Gippsland, Vic
    Age
    72
    Posts
    394

    Default

    When Packer started world series cricket our cricketers were paid a pittance as were those from the porrer countries.

    Because he was able to sink millions of dollars and bulldoze advertisers to sponsor the 'pyjama' game its popularity never faltered. Today our top cricketers are amongst the highest paid (if not the highest) in the world.

    My point is that soccer in this country has it all ars about. Instead of trying to grow the game by flogging the Socceroos as a reason for our kids to take the game up in ther same numbers as do in AFL and NRL or cricket they need to pump millions into the game get the big corporates on board (not just for the period of the World Cup finals) build a decent national roster and ensure that young people beginning in the game get the experience of playing and training with our best

    Get Vidulka, and Kewell and all the other great Aussie players to play here in the off European off season during the formative years of our youngsters. Then when they retire pay them a decent salary to coach or train here.
    Cheers
    If you never made a mistake, you never made anything!


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    59
    Posts
    5,026

    Default

    That's the problem. Soccer is SO much bigger than cricket outside Australia. Packer could easily make Australian cricket attractive but no way could one man, no matter how rich, possibly hope to compete with the sort of money that is chucked about on football overseas. You are never going to be able to convince anyone with any talent to stay in Australia when they can make so much in Europe or the UK. Or anywhere else, except South America perhaps. There's plenty of money chucked about in the league and AFL but where else are those guys going to go? Some of the league guys go over to the UK but that's about it. All that will happen is that Australia will become an even bigger training ground for Europe and UK teams.
    "I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Australia and France
    Posts
    2,869

    Default

    Unless my information is wrong, the Salary Cap for A-League soccer in Aus is $1.6m per TEAM.

    The AVERAGE salary of a Premiership league PLAYER in the UK is about $1.6million before allowances which add up to 100% on top of that.

    £676,000: The average salary of a Premiership footballer in 2006
    The Independent's exclusive survey reveals the facts and figures of footballers' finances

    By Nick Harris
    Published: 11 April 2006
    The average basic salary of a footballer in the English Premiership is £676,000 a year, or £13,000 per week, according to an exclusive survey of professional players by The Independent. That figure typically rises by between 60 and 100 per cent when performance-related bonuses, including for actually playing, are added.

    The basic pay represents an average rise in earnings of 65 per cent since 2000, the last occasion that a large-scale study was done. The average then was £409,000 a year, or almost £8,000 a week.
    Wouldn't it just be simpler for Australia to try to run a first division team in the UK, a bit like NZ does in Rugby League here?

    Cheers,

    P

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    West Gippsland, Vic
    Age
    72
    Posts
    394

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bitingmidge
    Unless my information is wrong, the Salary Cap for A-League soccer in Aus is $1.6m per TEAM.

    The AVERAGE salary of a Premiership league PLAYER in the UK is about $1.6million before allowances which add up to 100% on top of that.



    Wouldn't it just be simpler for Australia to try to run a first division team in the UK, a bit like NZ does in Rugby League here?

    Cheers,

    P
    Yep. There's that. Good idea.
    If you never made a mistake, you never made anything!


  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Too close to Sydney
    Posts
    133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shedhand
    My point is that soccer in this country has it all ars about. Instead of trying to grow the game by flogging the Socceroos as a reason for our kids to take the game up in ther same numbers as do in AFL and NRL or cricket
    Football already has more participants than any other code.

    Our problem is as Midge indicated. To sit on the bench in Europe is more attractive than playing here. If everyone in the world played AFL or NRL, then our best AFL and NRL players would be playing where the big bucks are on offer. And that's not here.

    What we can hope for is to build a league that can keep a hold of our second tier players until a big euro club wants them.

Similar Threads

  1. Should Australia be a Republic?
    By mario118 in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATION
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 9th June 2006, 02:26 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 22nd May 2006, 11:33 PM
  3. Australia Day - A Bit Late but worth a read
    By barnsey in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATION
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 31st January 2005, 12:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •