Fingerprint readers

[ozwinner]

Are the all they are cracked up to be for security?
I read online that the code for them has been cracked.

Al :confused:

[echnidna]

Theres no writing on mine Al.

Seriously though nothing is absolutely secure.

It really comes down to the level of security.

[chrisb691]

I'm not an expert on these, but the reality is that if a knowledgeable person wants to get into your system...they will. But even NASA, and the Pentagon, can't neccessarily keep these individuals out. If you are talking about the average Joe, then they are probably relatively safe. But so is a password. I would think that they are probably more of a convenience thing.

Oh yeah. If you've got one, all a person needs is your finger. Whereas a dead body can't give out a password.

[Grunt]

The finger print technology has the advantage over passwords because

1. You can easily forget you password. You usually don't lose a finger. Maybe these arn't such a good idea for woodworkers.
2. Spyware which records which keys you've pressed won't be able to see you type your password.

[Ashore]

For every person inventing a new lock there are four working out a way to pick it
Can't rember where I read it Think it was Houdini

[echnidna]

That reminds me, I must go and buy that book on how to pick a lock.

[ozwinner]

But would a fingerprint reader out wit a key logger?

Al :confused:

[Gra]

Depends on if you are a one finger typist

Seriously yes they would, as you havent pressed any keys for the key logger to record, another way to get around this is before you log onto any website have a word document, open with your passwords in it. then do a copy and paste. the key logger wont be able to link the keystrokes with the password...

Jut dont save the document anywhere.

[Schtoo]

That reminds me, I must go and buy that book on how to pick a lock.

Why?

It's quite well known that the universal lockpick is a cordless drill with a 1/8" bit in it and a flat screwdriver...

(And here I am, having picked at least 2 supposed 'impossible to pick' locks without destroying them. :eek: )

[echnidna]

Why?

It's quite well known that the universal lockpick is a cordless drill with a 1/8" bit in it and a flat screwdriver...

(And here I am, having picked at least 2 supposed 'impossible to pick' locks without destroying them. :eek: )

Yeah, I've opened a few locks that way,
but I must be doing something wrong,
they don't seem to work after the drill.

I need to be able to open rooms after people lock their keys inside. :eek:

[swiftden]

Gee i could be stuffed with one of these!! but least it was only a little finger.
They are only as secure as the dumbest hacker!

[Iain]

I worked with these briefly and found that the iris reader was more accurate and less prone to fraud, on the down side, it cost a hellof a lot more.
I lifted a print on tape and got it to read once, and I am not an expert!

[Daddles]

If I used a finger print reader, it'd be just my luck to run that finger through the table saw :eek:

Richard

[Pat]

Bob, haven't you got a master key

[echnidna]

The master key system wore out years ago because as locks packed up they were just replaced with whatever was handy at the time.