Results 16 to 30 of 31
-
26th April 2006, 06:27 PM #16Originally Posted by Termite"Clear, Ease Springs"
www.Stu's Shed.com
-
26th April 2006, 06:31 PM #17Originally Posted by Shedhand
and a strong one at that. 70 ton no worrys mate.First On Race Day
And the first brock trophy goes to...............
and we got no "2" as well
A FORD driver.
ironic isnt it?
and if ya cant win on ya own merit punt em off!!!
holden cheater team!!!!!
-
26th April 2006, 07:09 PM #18Originally Posted by black1
-
26th April 2006, 08:06 PM #19Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 173
spent 4 years using the steyr, I found it great, only ever carried the slr with blanks, I tell you what, you can have it. Big bloody thing it was. I think it was mentioned earlier but the SS109 has the same punch as the 7.62, it has tungsten rod in the head that causes it to tumble and stay in the body effectively turning it into mush or so was told by an NCO at singleton. We used it out to 600m, never had any troubles with it in training. we should have gone with the m16a2 when we changed over.
-
26th April 2006, 08:36 PM #20Originally Posted by black1
Cheers
go the HAWKS.If you never made a mistake, you never made anything!
-
26th April 2006, 09:50 PM #21SS109 has the same punch as the 7.62, it has tungsten rod in the head that causes it to tumble and stay in the body effectively turning it into mush or so was told by an NCO at singleton
Another reason the 5.56 mm round was brought in (and yes the 7.62 had real knockdown power) is that the 5.56mm is less likely to exit and cause damage to anyone else. Handy for UN style peacemaking missions i.e. shoot the baddie using the marketplace crowd as a shield, and you don't want to kill the next two people behind them. That would equal a manslaughter charge, and generally be bad for business with the locals perception of you.
Also the Steyr is small and therefor good for urban ops and vehicle ops (actually the carbine version is more accurate as the rifling is most efficient over that barrel length) as well as jungle and close country fighting. A 7.62mm needs a longer barrel, so a longer weapon, therefor more unwieldly.
Lastly IMO (again ) it is effective out to 600m, and thats too far away anyway. More, easily, accurate (funny term that) than using iron sights at 600m.
-
26th April 2006, 10:57 PM #22
I dunno, I still like my old three-oh, must be all the wood on it maybe?
Good for when you run out of ammo, you can use it as a club! Try that with plastic!
-
27th April 2006, 09:54 AM #23
Both the 5.56 and the 7.62 have their advantages/disadvantages. The velocity of the 5.56 has massive stopping power with less chance of collateral damage, but due to its velocity it is less effective in a bushy situation due to the fact that it can self destruct on impact with a very small shrub, where the lower velocity 7.62 will punch on through. Personally I wouldn't like to be on the receiving end of either, it's not pretty.
-
27th April 2006, 10:48 AM #24
I used to shoot the SLR in the RAAF back in the '80's. Always found the recoil hard to handle but I was a scrawny thing back then!
Wasn't there an L2A1, or L2A2, a beefed up automatic version as well?
Cheers,Andy Mac
Change is inevitable, growth is optional.
-
27th April 2006, 11:34 AM #25Banned
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Burnett Heads, QLD
- Age
- 65
- Posts
- 305
Originally Posted by Andy Mac
-
27th April 2006, 12:11 PM #26Originally Posted by doug the slugCheers,
Craig
-
27th April 2006, 12:29 PM #27
Slr.
Stillthe L2A1 was a good weapon as it provided the section with a back up auto matic capability. It was normally issued to tail end charlie as his weapon of responsibility. Now with the F88 it gives more fire power though all members having automatic fire. Having experienced the use of all section weapons over the years the F88 does have its place. The m16m4 is now being issied to spec ops units as preference. I must admit though I like 7.62 as a section weapon in the form of the M60. Its stopping power is 2nd to none. With the F88 a 203 grenade launcher can be fitted as well to give a harder hitting force when in contact. My thoughts only and no I wouldn't like to be on the receiving end of either of them.
Dave,
hug the tree before you start the chainsaw.
-
27th April 2006, 04:12 PM #28Originally Posted by Andy Mac
Blokes in the Falklands were grabbing the Argy ones which were full auto.
-
27th April 2006, 04:37 PM #29Originally Posted by havenoideaatall
-
27th April 2006, 05:17 PM #30Originally Posted by ShedhandFirst On Race Day
And the first brock trophy goes to...............
and we got no "2" as well
A FORD driver.
ironic isnt it?
and if ya cant win on ya own merit punt em off!!!
holden cheater team!!!!!
Bookmarks