![Thanks](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/thanks.png)
![Likes](https://www.renovateforums.com.au/dbtech/thanks/images/likes.png)
![Needs Pictures](https://www.woodworkforums.com/images/smilies/happy/photo4.gif)
![Picture(s) thanks](https://www.ubeaut.biz/wave.gif)
Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: Photo size ?
-
16th April 2006, 10:53 PM #1
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Wide Bay Qld.
- Age
- 82
- Posts
- 10
Photo size ?
:confused: My son took some pics of the poker table and sent them back to me by email in JPG format (what ever that is) and when I look at their properties it is 1.02 to 1.04 MB is that postable or does it have to be modified and if so how do I go about it.
Thanks Arch
-
17th April 2006, 12:34 AM #2
1 meg is rather large for a photo for the broadband challenged (thank you for nothing, Telstra, I laugh every time your share price drops), as it takes around four minutes to download.
You should be able to get your pics down to around 100k without loosing detail. See this forum thread for more info.
A jpg file is an image file that has been stored using a lossy compression (data is permanently removed from the image) algorithim. The final result is not as good as the original, but think of it as the photo equivalent of those tv game show disclaimers - "portions of this program not relevant to the outcome have been edited from this broadcast"
Or read about jpg in detail here.
-
17th April 2006, 02:01 AM #3
Feed your photo files through jpegcompress (windows) or smallimage (mac) -- both freeware, see google -- and fiddle with the settings to compress the file size while keeping the size of the image the same. At extreme levels of compression, you start to loose image quality, but for anything up to about 3/4 of your computer screen size, you should be able to get them below 100kBytes.
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them . . . well, I have others.
Similar Threads
-
Deck plans, selecting size for bearer & joist
By tinsmith in forum DECKINGReplies: 10Last Post: 20th November 2003, 08:55 AM