Results 16 to 30 of 33
-
15th April 2006, 09:28 AM #16
Al, I bought a cheap Kodak camera for my daughter, also use a Kodak for work. Now the cameras perform as I would expect, but the software is dreadfully.
The software is clunky and unreliable. Last week the program stopped working and caused the PC to run very slow. I had to reinstall from the CD to get it to work. When it installed it in overwrote all of the pictures previously stored under the default storage location. :mad:
The other issue I have with it is the software updater. This beast is constantly running in the background.
Anyway I would never buy a Kodak again just because their software is horrible.Specializing in O positive timber stains
-
15th April 2006, 09:32 AM #17Registered
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- .
- Posts
- 4,816
I tend not to use their software.
I download into Photoshop.
On software, I always turn off the update feature as they seem to want to download at the wrong moment.
Al
-
15th April 2006, 10:11 AM #18
Yow !! :eek:
You using Photoshop tells me you know your photography - so I withdraw from offering my opinion.
-
15th April 2006, 10:17 AM #19
Al get a real camera go an digital SLR, bugger the expense its only your money
Some People are like slinky's,
They serve no purpose at all,
but they put a smile on your face when you throw them down the stairs.
-
15th April 2006, 10:21 AM #20Registered
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- .
- Posts
- 4,816
Originally Posted by masoth
Al
-
15th April 2006, 10:44 AM #21
Got photoshop, don't use it
Prefer Paint Shop Pro
As Al says "Its all smoke and mirrors my boy, smoke and mirrors."
-
15th April 2006, 10:48 AM #22Registered
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- .
- Posts
- 4,816
How do you find Paint Shop Pro to use?
Is it easier then Photoshop?
I only use PS for reduceing the image size, as I find the other functions a pain to use.
Al
-
15th April 2006, 10:53 AM #23
Its much easier to use.
Theres also lots of tutorials online if you google.
-
15th April 2006, 11:35 AM #24SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Cockatoo Vic
- Posts
- 0
The capabilities of Photoshop are realy quite amazing. It is used almost exclusivly by professionals. Really an industry standard.
However the interface is a bit daunting and if Paint Shop Pro will do all you need then by all means go for it.
Photoshop Elements is definately worth considering. Allmost all of the capabilities of the full version (or the ones that most people want)
with a much easier to use interface. EDIT: and much cheaper too
Greolt
-
15th April 2006, 12:45 PM #25
Hi Al
I had difficulty uploading pics from my Kodak Box Brownie so I bought a digital camera
Timing is everything. I have just bought a new camera to replace my Olympus. The Olympus produced really excellent images but it just stopped working after 3 years and the cost of having a quote and repairs (even if minor) is not cost effective ($85 to look, and a minimum of $200 for any repair on what was originally a $600 camera - anyone here with expertise to identify a fault yell out please).
So I bought a Canon A540 with a 512 Mb memory card - these are extra cost which you must factor into the final price - and 6 years full replacement extended warrentee for $550. This camera has 6 MP and a 4X optical zoom.
I should add that I had the camera shop demonstrate several cameras (it was a quiet time for them) in the macro (close-up) mode that is important to me, and this Canon was head-and-shoulders above just about all, and the best of the bunch up to $800 (for a camera alone).
The 6 MP is a bonus and not really important since my pictures need to be reduced in size for the internet. What was more important to me was to obtain fine detail in close-ups of tools. So I was taking notice of the built-in flash, macro facility, size of screen, and manual controls.
It comes with better software than my old Olympus, although I edit with Photoshop anyway.
The bottom line is to narrow down the intended use of the camera and get a few demoed. If my experience is typical, then you will find a wide range in performances.
Regards from Perth
Derek
-
15th April 2006, 01:26 PM #26You've got to risk it to get the biscuit
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Canberra
- Age
- 32
- Posts
- 0
Originally Posted by ozwinnerS T I R L O
-
16th April 2006, 03:40 PM #27Registered
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- .
- Posts
- 4,816
Thanks guys but I decided against the Kodak and went and bought my self a Canon S2IS.
Cost $650 from Hardley Normal, a little more than I wanted to pay but from all accounts a far better camera.
Al
-
16th April 2006, 04:32 PM #28
I don't think you'll regret that one Oz!
Cheers,
P
-
16th April 2006, 04:41 PM #29Registered
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- .
- Posts
- 4,816
Im still finding my way around the camera but it is a thing of beauty.
I took a couple of piccys today in Avoca to try it out but I dont hink I had the resolution set properly.
Al
-
16th April 2006, 05:47 PM #30
Good one Al.
And 12 * optical zoom too. Jealous of that bit!Bob Willson
The term 'grammar nazi' was invented to make people, who don't know their grammar, feel OK about being uneducated.
Similar Threads
-
Advice from the IT people sought
By Ashore in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATIONReplies: 37Last Post: 15th January 2006, 03:39 PM -
Photo slideshow advice sought
By Oldblock in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATIONReplies: 7Last Post: 14th February 2005, 04:54 PM
Bookmarks