Results 76 to 90 of 106
-
4th January 2006, 01:41 PM #76
Really, who gives a f#ck. Beware the return of the spelling/grammar nazis.
Is there anything easier done than said?- Stacky. The bottom pub, Cobram.
-
4th January 2006, 01:42 PM #77Originally Posted by craigbPhoto Gallery
-
4th January 2006, 01:48 PM #78
I don't care, they are wrong.
What does gotten provide that got doesn't ?
I would have expected better than that from the Macquarie frankly.
Does it have dove as the past tense of dive too?
-
4th January 2006, 02:35 PM #79
Actually, I think you will find that the Macquarie's charter is to provide a description of modern Australian word usage, not to be the arbiter of what is right and wrong.
This is the problem we face because like it or not, over time a common error becomes entrenched in the language and thus it changes. For example, contractions like "don't" are perfectly acceptable today but I bet there was some knuckle rapping that went on when it first started to become popular."I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
4th January 2006, 02:46 PM #80Actually, I think you will find that the Macquarie's charter is to provide a description of modern Australian word usage, not to be the arbiter of what is right and wrong.
How about 'ill gotten gains'? Hard to justify saying 'ill got gains'.Photo Gallery
-
4th January 2006, 02:47 PM #81Originally Posted by Grunt
-
4th January 2006, 02:49 PM #82
Has Grunt gotten his point across yet?
Fer once I'm with the hound, evolve you buggas or be extinct .Bruce C.
catchy catchphrase needed here, apply in writing to the above .
-
4th January 2006, 02:53 PM #83Originally Posted by craigb
'ill got gains' sounds like a Cockney would say it. Thos', ill got gains, eh Gov?Photo Gallery
-
4th January 2006, 02:54 PM #84Originally Posted by E. maculata
It's not eveloution it's illiteracy.
-
4th January 2006, 02:56 PM #85
T-rex = Dinosaur
Photo Gallery
-
4th January 2006, 02:58 PM #86Originally Posted by craigb
As for Dan asking what does it matter?? One of the reasons we have policemen is to reinforce boundaries of behaviour that society deems acceptable.
By nature we need boundaries to either push or live within.
If we had no rules or conventions with language, we would all be speaking differently, and would not be able to communicate at all.
One of the marvels of language is that it is always evolving. I have no issues with those who are ignorant of the rules our who just don't get them (those with poor spelling for instance) getting the occasional word wrong, but to turn an adverb into an adjective by adding the suffix "izational" or to create a whole new term "negative growth" when there is already a perfectly good suite of words that serve the purpose is an affront to anyone who thinks seriously about the language.
Surely we are not making it simpler by creating new words?
For the record, "gotten" is indeed the past participle of "get" from Middle English, yet even in North American usage they have different meanings. Gotten usually emplies the process of obtaining something "ill-gotten gains" while got implies a state of possession or ownership.
Cheers,
P (who is fascinated by this stuff and must read more!)
-
4th January 2006, 02:58 PM #87Originally Posted by Grunt
That doesn't mean and never will that the past tense of get is gotten.
It may be in common use in America but we don't speak American English here. Which was how this started in the first place.
I still would think that gains could be "ill got". Shakespear probably used it.
-
4th January 2006, 03:05 PM #88I still would think that gains could be "ill got".
get got give gave giving given
It all sounds like nonsense after awhile if you say it over and over.
My 6yo daughter has developed a habit of saying 'caughten' instead of caught. Makes sense to her She'd probably say 'gotten' too but then she doesn't know any better."I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
-
4th January 2006, 03:16 PM #89
May I introduce you our new English language consultant.
Sorry little Britain is a big thing in the house at the moment.
-
4th January 2006, 03:18 PM #90
Jive,
De English language be a livin' language
Sweedish English
Zee Ingleesh lungooege-a is a leefing lungooege-a
This whole discussion has gotten out of hand.
Photo Gallery
Bookmarks