Results 1 to 15 of 30
Thread: Twiggy Forrest
-
21st October 2020, 09:44 PM #1China
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- South Australia
- Posts
- 140
Twiggy Forrest
Bravo to twiggy Forrest, no matter what you think of him he is doing what many others should be doing bringing Australia back to Australia
-
21st October 2020, 10:34 PM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Seaford, Vic
- Posts
- 21
-
21st October 2020, 10:43 PM #3
-
21st October 2020, 10:47 PM #4China
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- South Australia
- Posts
- 140
Twiggy Forrest has purchased R.M Williams from the private equity group L Catterton group it is now fully Australian owned again.
-
21st October 2020, 10:49 PM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Seaford, Vic
- Posts
- 21
-
22nd October 2020, 06:46 AM #6GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Apr 2018
- Location
- Nsw
- Age
- 65
- Posts
- 558
Not wanting to take anything away from Twiggy because he’s doing a great job but you have to ask about the rules and financial environment that we have created here that these iconic Australian companies end up O/S in the first place
-
22nd October 2020, 10:04 AM #7
-
22nd October 2020, 02:53 PM #8SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Elizabeth Bay / Oberon NSW
- Age
- 76
- Posts
- 133
I wonder if Twiggy is planning to bring the manufacturing back onshore. They're a pretty expensive pair of boots now and certainly not farm boots. Think I'll stick with my Blundstones.
mick
-
22nd October 2020, 02:55 PM #9GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- Sunbury, Vic
- Age
- 85
- Posts
- 632
-
22nd October 2020, 05:02 PM #10GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Apr 2018
- Location
- Nsw
- Age
- 65
- Posts
- 558
I am fairly sure they are made in Adelaide and have about 100 staff
-
22nd October 2020, 05:05 PM #11GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Apr 2018
- Location
- Nsw
- Age
- 65
- Posts
- 558
Not disagreeing with you but it is the government of the day who sets the rules to allow these types of dealings to take place.
I don’t think you can blame the owners/ shareholders etc as they are only doing the best they can for their circumstances and who here wouldn’t do the same.
-
22nd October 2020, 07:54 PM #12
-
22nd October 2020, 09:52 PM #13China
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- South Australia
- Posts
- 140
Glider I don't know what clarifies a boot as a farm boot, I have personally owned several pairs of RM Boots, ( made in Salisbury South Australia) The current pair have seen years of service on the opal fields and have been resoled
They are expensive I would still pick Australian made over foreign made Blundstones
-
23rd October 2020, 05:47 PM #14GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Queensland
- Posts
- 613
Mine just about worn to death both here and overseas.
They are so old style that they came with leather heels, very noisy and were replaced with rubber, great.
My only issue these days is finding an old fashioned “boot” maker as the ‘lastic sides have given up the ghost and need replacing.Regards,
Bob
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
-
23rd October 2020, 11:36 PM #15
On Capitalism
Its interesting.
Only yesterday my son (23) asked me about various governances and the core monetary/social policies that sit behind philosophies such as communism, socialism and capitalism (and the in-betweens). It wasn't a deep question, for it was only asked(ignore-this-bit) because of the US Presidential Debate and the irrationality by one of the ... representatives .(/ignore-this-bit)
It was interesting, for I was explaining the core tenets of Marxism (without the USA-hysteria that they "think" is Marxism).... afterwards it had me thinking. I like to spend an hour in solitude to do this each day.
The aspect of "workers should own the means of production" kept coming back to me, especially within the issue of share ownership. Made me wonder, why, if a workers job is so important, do they not invest more into the share market (capitalism) to own the production of the business (Marxism). If not their own business, but someone's business.
The issue of RM Williams being rebought by an Aussie is a good one. True capitalism will sell an asset to the highest bidder. Borders should be irrelevant (although, as we all know, they are not). This had me thinking, why don't the 100 WORKERS buy the company THEMSELVES and ensure they retain a job under their own terms.
It makes one think.
They didn't.
And that there, was my answer.
Similar Threads
-
Forrest Gump and Saint Peter
By Kev Y. in forum JOKESReplies: 1Last Post: 13th September 2004, 10:09 AM
Bookmarks