Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 35 of 35
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    74
    Posts
    1,761

    Default

    Ross

    Thanks for the links. they are most interesting. Whether the concepts can be translated into viable projects remains to be seen.

    Just out of interest, the two largest power stations in the world are both Hydro.

    China has the Three Gorges Dam station:

    Three Gorges Dam: The world's largest hydroelectric plant

    and Brazil/Paraguay have the Itaipu Dam station.

    Itaipu Dam - Wikipedia

    Although the Chinese dam is nominally bigger, I think the South American project generates more.

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RossM View Post
    We are not talking PHES at that scale, we only require short term off river storage systems. A 200MW project requires about 2 GigaLitres of water. Just before xmas the Qld government started to truck about 2 MegaLitres of water per day to a drought affected dam. Based on their costs it would be around $50M to provide the needed water for a 200MW facility. However this is really moot and I apologise; I probably should not have mentioned trucking above, as it really is a distraction. There are so many potential sites and we need so few to secure the required energy that we can afford to select sites with good local water availability.
    Ross
    I take your caution about mentioning trucking water at commercial rates, but feel I must comment on your contention that we -- in Australia -- only require short term energy storage.

    A study from a few years ago -- which I can't currently find to link to -- estimated a worst case scenario where Australia needed something like 3 days of water battery backup energy generation. That quantity of storage would allow Australia to become 100% carbon free -- discounting the carbon released by dams, solar and wind -- and provide something like 1 in 10,000 reliability (but it may have only been 1 in 1000).
    (For comparison, dam safety is assessed as a 1 in 15,000 risk -- and some people find that risk of failure too high.)

    In 2016/17 Australia's electricity production was 258 TeraWatt hours (258 x 10^12 Wh) -- 3 days electricity consumption is roughly 2 TWh.
    Even if you are prepared to accept a higher risk of power disruption, even 1 TWh of energy storage is still a very very large number.

    So even if 1,000 of the 22,000 potential pumped hydro sites are viable, at 200 MW per site -- each site needs to run for something like 5 hours to supply a total of 1 TWh. At 2 Gl of water per site, that's something like 3,300 times the volume of Lake Eucumbene (when it's full). A hugh volume of water.


    If the Australian grid is to become self-sustaining and stable, we can not kid ourselves on the scale of the generation "problem". When the lights go out, it's too late to say "I should have ..."
    regards from Alberta, Canada

    ian

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ian View Post
    Ross
    I take your caution about mentioning trucking water at commercial rates, but feel I must comment on your contention that we -- in Australia -- only require short term energy storage.

    A study from a few years ago -- which I can't currently find to link to -- estimated a worst case scenario where Australia needed something like 3 days of water battery backup energy generation. That quantity of storage would allow Australia to become 100% carbon free -- discounting the carbon released by dams, solar and wind -- and provide something like 1 in 10,000 reliability (but it may have only been 1 in 1000).
    (For comparison, dam safety is assessed as a 1 in 15,000 risk -- and some people find that risk of failure too high.)

    In 2016/17 Australia's electricity production was 258 TeraWatt hours (258 x 10^12 Wh) -- 3 days electricity consumption is roughly 2 TWh.
    Even if you are prepared to accept a higher risk of power disruption, even 1 TWh of energy storage is still a very very large number.

    So even if 1,000 of the 22,000 potential pumped hydro sites are viable, at 200 MW per site -- each site needs to run for something like 5 hours to supply a total of 1 TWh. At 2 Gl of water per site, that's something like 3,300 times the volume of Lake Eucumbene (when it's full). A hugh volume of water.


    If the Australian grid is to become self-sustaining and stable, we can not kid ourselves on the scale of the generation "problem". When the lights go out, it's too late to say "I should have ..."
    Hi Ian,

    In fact the modelling shows 450GWh (=- 30%) of reserve capacity is required for complete transition to renewable. In a 100% renewables grid, this would likely come from a mix of PHES, battery and demand management. PHES is likely to have a cost advantage over other technologies for quite a while. Reserve power needed is about 20GW

    There is an interesting paper on storage options here:
    https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/wp...-Australia.pdf

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    Ross
    One day you will have to tell me who you work for, or previously worked for.

    Thank you for that link.
    I'm not sure it references the study I referred to above, my recollection is of a paper or report dated prior to 2016.

    I take two things away from what little I read in your link.

    1. If Australia is to embrace a 100% renewable electricity grid we will need to radically rethink how we fund reserve capacity. At some point we as a nation will need to accept that keeping the lights on (or the air con running) will require that we as a nation accept higher energy prices. The SA battery is proving vital to smoothing transients in the SA electricity supply, but at less than 200 MWh (after expansion) it is still too small to power the state through a night, let alone two consecutive cloudy days and three nights. The SA battery would need to be at least three orders of magnitude bigger for this task. And please don't mention the capacity "reserve" inherent in electric cars. Don't know about you, but I want my car ready to go in the morning, not sitting in the garage because its battery is flat because it's been powering the grid all night.

    2. The Climate Council is not a disinterested player in this discussion. Like all lobby groups it has an agenda to push.
    regards from Alberta, Canada

    ian

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 1999
    Location
    Westleigh, Sydney
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,332

    Default

    Can I thank all the participants in this discussion, both for the wide range of knowledge you bring and for the civil manner in which it is being carried out. May it continue.
    Visit my website
    Website
    Facebook

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 20th October 2009, 05:20 PM
  2. Filtering water going into a rain water tank
    By ljcox in forum LANDSCAPING, GARDENING, OUTDOORS
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 22nd December 2007, 12:49 PM
  3. Water tank. Divert water to mains.
    By tourgy in forum PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, HEATING, COOLING, etc
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 14th July 2007, 10:19 AM
  4. Electric hot water system making cold water
    By Nolesy in forum PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, HEATING, COOLING, etc
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 14th December 2006, 08:36 PM
  5. Hot water system troubleshooting (bosch water wizard 780)
    By weezlebub in forum PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, HEATING, COOLING, etc
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 5th July 2006, 07:41 PM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •