Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 36
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Australia and France
    Posts
    2,869

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gingermick
    Which one's that, "Bear Mountain picnic"?
    I'd be thinking "Lay, lady lay."

    P(till the break of day!)

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    ...
    Posts
    1,460

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bitingmidge
    I'd be thinking "Lay, lady lay."

    P(till the break of day!)

    No need to wait for the end of the world for that.


    Peter.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bitingmidge
    Good point except for the "better at" bit. I don't think we should confuse quantity with quality, and we should specially not confuse it with equality or objectivity, of which there is none.
    Agreed - but they have definitly got better at delivering quantity even though it might not be quality, so my statement still stands!

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    tasmania
    Age
    60
    Posts
    154

    Default stretch your imagination

    O.K. Global warming is a fact . In Siberia temperatures have risen 3 degrees . Water temp has risen . There is now a coral reef off Tasmania that was not there 30 years ago . Fact .
    So what happens when things heat up ? They expand . The earth is a globe and as it expands it causes an earthquake .
    They are already saying the cyclones are caused by warming of the oceans causing winds to develop . Something like the el-nino effect .

    Just my theory .

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Melbourne - Outer East Foothills
    Posts
    1,557

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_rine
    O.K. Global warming is a fact .
    No it isn't, global temperatures were higher 40 years ago than they are now.

    It's a myth spread by the greenies.

    The earth has gone through masny climate change cycle over millions of years and has been stable for some time.
    If at first you don't succeed, give something else a go. Life is far too short to waste time trying.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Burnett Heads, QLD
    Age
    65
    Posts
    305

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_rine
    ....... They are already saying the cyclones are caused by warming of the oceans causing winds to develop ......
    There might be something in what you say rick. eating chilli also causes a warming effect and is responsible for wind, and also symptoms not unlike an earthquake in some individuals

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bunbury W.A.
    Age
    56
    Posts
    294

    Default

    I personally believe that it has the makings of the biggest pile of crap i have ever had the privelege to witness.

    Natural disasters are just that.......natural.
    With our reliance on technology we have assumed that our power out weighs that of mother nature.....we are merely pawns in the end game and imho i dont think mother nature gives a s**t about how rich you are or wether you ride a bike to work to help save all of those greenhouse emissions.

    There is a lot to be said about Carpe Diem........you never know what day will be your last. Wether it be by accident, earth quake or flood.
    That being said........why the big hooo haaa about nuclear power stations.
    By products aside ( currently all the materials used have a by product, wether it be coal or gas) Wind or solar arent taken into account as they generally need a helping hand by those previously mentioned,nuclear produces the cleanest energy by a country mile.
    Yes, its by product, or at least its disposal, is distasteful.......but we cant have our cake and eat it too.
    I think that most of the human race are very short sighted and most couldnt give 2 ***** about the condition of mother earth, they are more concerned with the contents of their hip pockets.

    And that goes for the so called greenies too!!!
    if you always do as you have always done, you will always get what you have always got

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Mackay Qld
    Age
    50
    Posts
    1,039

    Default

    I also heard about another polution related effect. Global dimming. I see its already affected a few here but; Extra particles in the atmosphere reflecting light, hence heat, thus negating global warming. Or it could have been a hoax and I'm Globally dim.
    Mick

    avantguardian

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Australia and France
    Posts
    2,869

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gumby
    It's a myth spread by the greenies.
    So the more greenies you have, the less you should be believed!

    P

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    tasmania
    Age
    60
    Posts
    154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maglite
    .why the big hooo haaa about nuclear power stations.
    By products aside ( currently all the materials used have a by product, wether it be coal or gas) Wind or solar arent taken into account as they generally need a helping hand by those previously mentioned,nuclear produces the cleanest energy by a country mile.
    Yes, its by product, or at least its disposal, is distasteful.......but we cant have our cake and eat it too.
    I think that most of the human race are very short sighted and most couldnt give 2 ***** about the condition of mother earth, they are more concerned with the contents of their hip pockets.

    And that goes for the so called greenies too!!!

    What I don't get is why the greens stopped the building of the franklin dam ? Surely it would be better to have more clean Hydro power , and yes I think its time we re-visited the idea of nuclear power too .

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Australia and France
    Posts
    2,869

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_rine
    I think its time we re-visited the idea of nuclear power too .
    Revisiting the idea is a good thing..... so here is a site that is also worthrevisiting. If you haven't already done so, spend about 10minutes doing the tour.

    http://www.kiddofspeed.com/default.htm

    I'm not at all anti-nuclear power, but there just may be a few issues that haven't been quite resolved......

    Cheers,

    P
    (Insert very serious, pondering smilie here.)

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Romsey Victoria
    Age
    63
    Posts
    2,102

    Default

    The problem with nuclear power is what do you do with the waste.
    How do you safely store nuclear waste with a half-life of 1000 years? There is just no way that we can guarantee that we could build a safe storage facility that will last 3 or 4 thousand years.

    Sure, it'll solve our problems but future generations will be less happy.

    I'm not in favour of building lakes over wilderness areas. There is so little wilderness left that I think we need to leave a little bit for our children.

    I think Australia should build gas fired power stations. We have an abundant supply of natural gas. We could use this until the technology solar/wind or other renewable sources are up to speed. We need to keep investing in these so the technology advances.
    Photo Gallery

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    123

    Talking "bug-ger one day before my b'day"

    Oh well, time to cash in the super and go fishing etc...

    http://tv.yahoo.com/news/wwn/20050912/112653720001.html

    Himzo
    There's no such thing as too many Routers

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Conder, ACT
    Age
    78
    Posts
    4,213

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grunt
    The problem with nuclear power is what do you do with the waste.
    There is surprisingly little dangerous waste to be stored.
    With fuel rods- only a couple of percent of the rod is actually used and it can be reprocessed.
    This leaves only a tiny bit of waste that could easily be set into stabilized blocks and buried.
    The worlds total of really dangerous waste is not many cubic meters. The rest could be stored in drums and buried in a dry stable area.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    tasmania
    Age
    60
    Posts
    154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DavidG
    There is surprisingly little dangerous waste to be stored.
    With fuel rods- only a couple of percent of the rod is actually used and it can be reprocessed.
    This leaves only a tiny bit of waste that could easily be set into stabilized blocks and buried.
    The worlds total of really dangerous waste is not many cubic meters. The rest could be stored in drums and buried in a dry stable area.
    I'm definetly no expert but why couldnt they just shoot it out into space .
    It has to be cleaner than coal and even gas , we could keep our wilderness .

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •