Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 51

Thread: Help! - maths

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Sunny side of Derwent River
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ian View Post
    how about

    find the missing number (x)
    SQRT (169)
    SQRT (25)
    SQRT (x)
    I go with 4.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Age
    71
    Posts
    456

    Default

    Although 1,5,13 is a recognized sequence, being given only 2 values of a sequence I would argue there is actually no correct arithmetic answer as there is nothing other than elegance to solve for. Unlike the original challenge.
    Franklin

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Sunbury, Vic
    Age
    85
    Posts
    632

    Default

    3 fits in that sequence also therefore x could equal 9
    Tom

    "It's good enough" is low aim

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Victoria
    Age
    47
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Now, how does one 'add' -21?

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Sunbury, Vic
    Age
    85
    Posts
    632

    Default

    The minus sign means that you subtract 21 from the other total.

    So in the original question 28 + 29 = 57 57 - 21 = 36 The square root of 36 is 6 (6 x 6 = 36)
    Tom

    "It's good enough" is low aim

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuzzie View Post
    If only Clinton's original challenge had to do with some sort of prime number calculation.
    Quote Originally Posted by ian View Post
    how about

    find the missing number (x)
    SQRT (169)
    SQRT (25)
    SQRT (x)
    Quote Originally Posted by Fuzzie View Post
    Although 1,5,13 is a recognized sequence, being given only 2 values of a sequence I would argue there is actually no correct arithmetic answer as there is nothing other than elegance to solve for. Unlike the original challenge.
    Perhaps too elegant a challenge.

    I was picking up Fuzzie's request for a challenge involving prime numbers.

    5 and 13 are both prime, the third number, while not a prime involves solving a right triangle.
    regards from Alberta, Canada

    ian

  7. #37
    rrich Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Shed View Post
    It is also wildly off-topic.
    Quote Originally Posted by AlexS View Post
    Yeah, but...
    Oh, pictures please!

  8. #38
    rrich Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ian View Post
    how about

    find the missing number (x)
    SQRT (169)
    SQRT (25)
    SQRT (x)
    So X would be 9.

    A better scenario would be;
    SQRT (169)
    SQRT (121)
    SQRT (49)
    SQRT (25)
    SQRT (x) Where x=9
    Or the SQRT results 13, 11, 7, 5, and 3

    OK, the horse is dead.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AlexS View Post
    Better yet, x=-1
    I'm fairly certain that i is not a prime number
    regards from Alberta, Canada

    ian

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rrich View Post
    So X would be 9.

    A better scenario would be;
    SQRT (169)
    SQRT (121)
    SQRT (49)
    SQRT (25)
    SQRT (x) Where x=9
    Or the SQRT results 13, 11, 7, 5, and 3

    OK, the horse is dead.
    Now that is an elegant prime number problem
    regards from Alberta, Canada

    ian

  11. #41
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Age
    71
    Posts
    456

    Default

    Perhaps for that challenge the given sequence should just be x,25,49,121,169. Providing the sqrt() clue being redundant?

    BTW, Ian your challenge beat me. The sqrt() function actually made it solving the problem given 3 elements not 2! My bad.
    Last edited by Fuzzie; 9th February 2017 at 07:08 PM. Reason: edit
    Franklin

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Sunbury, Vic
    Age
    85
    Posts
    632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ian View Post

    5 and 13 are both prime, the third number, while not a prime involves solving a right triangle.
    12.

    5, 12, 13 where 5 and 12 are the sides of a triangle adjoining the right angle and 13 is the hypotenuse.

    In a right angled triangle, the sum of the squares of the 2 sides equals the square of the hypotenuse. (5x5) + (12x12) = (13x13)

    It is along time since I learned that t high school but has stuck as has 3,4,5 for the same purpose.
    Tom

    "It's good enough" is low aim

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Sunny side of Derwent River
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ari2 View Post
    I go with 4.
    4 fits because it follows the Fibonacci sequence. 0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21....

    13 sqrd = 169
    5 sqrd = 25
    2 sqrd = 4

    So it works if you skip the 3 and 8 in the sequence.


  14. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cranbourne West
    Age
    72
    Posts
    0

    Default

    I have been following this thread with interest. I admit I'm lost with all the prime and SQRT lingo, but I'll make my contribution.
    When I was building and servicing CNC machines I had to learn Hex.

    First 10 prime numbers in Hex.
    2
    3
    5
    7
    B
    D
    11
    13
    17
    1D

    And in Octal
    2
    3
    5
    7
    13
    15
    21
    23
    27
    35
    To grow old is inevitable.... To grow up is optional

    Confidence, the feeling you have before you fully understand the situation.

    What could possibly go wrong.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chesand View Post
    12.

    5, 12, 13 where 5 and 12 are the sides of a triangle adjoining the right angle and 13 is the hypotenuse.

    In a right angled triangle, the sum of the squares of the 2 sides equals the square of the hypotenuse. (5x5) + (12x12) = (13x13)

    It is along time since I learned that t high school but has stuck as has 3,4,5 for the same purpose.
    That's the answer I was looking for.
    regards from Alberta, Canada

    ian

Similar Threads

  1. maths question
    By SPIRIT in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATION
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 9th June 2008, 11:24 AM
  2. Beer Maths
    By hook in forum JOKES
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12th November 2000, 12:32 PM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •