Thanks: 1
Likes: 10
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 46 to 53 of 53
Thread: Squaring my lathe
-
1st July 2014, 05:31 PM #46
There's another layer of structure in there.. multiple independant companies all making the same identical product, how do they all get the same design?.. you see it all the time with electronics, and to a slightly lesser extent machine tools.. I think at last count there were 5 companies all making HM52 mills, or so close to the same you's have to look carefully to pick the differences. They might even compete among themselves for common components and services.
In the case of the Huanyang VFD's I think Joe mentioned that there were Government contacts that passed the design details to interested manufacturers. The result is the same looking product, but slightly varying details and quality. Made by multiple independant companies.
( possibly all owned by the same parents.. the company owned by the local party bosses )
Ray
-
1st July 2014, 06:23 PM #47GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 2,947
Girl, I don't wanna know about your mild-mannered alter ego or anything like that." I mean, you tell me you're, uh, super-mega-ultra-lightning babe? That's all right with me. I'm good. I'm good.
-
1st July 2014, 06:30 PM #48SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 2,324
Quite right Peter, and I'm not suggesting for a moment that the lathes aren't necessarily accurate, they may be, and that's the whole circuitous point of how this relates to the OP; may. They MAY be accurate. The may not be too. There's a process to aligning a lathe and it begins at one point and ends at another. It doesn't mean you can't jump in half way through, but you would need to be very VERY careful if you do. If you did so presuming that a lathe like this was ever necessarily correct from the factory, notwithstanding its "test sheet", I think it would be foolish indeed. Instead I'd suggest going back to the beginning of the test process and sequentially confirming each measurement does indeed comply with the stated limits and then continue from there, well before any adjustments were made. Once you have a very good idea of where you stand, only then start to think about what and how you may go about correcting any errors.
-
1st July 2014, 06:37 PM #49SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Australia east coast
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 1,468
In the case of the 9x20 lathes, they stole it from an Emco Compact 8 and modified it. Some of the modifications are likely an improvement - there seems to be more mass in the Chinese lathes. However they're definitely not built or finished to the same standard.
My FIL has a Compact 8 in superb original condition so I'm very familiar with the original machine. IMO they're very light weight but there's no doubt they're well made and capable of accurate work. A well worked over Chinese copy *should* be capable of good work, but getting there might basically require replacing the spindle bearings and scraping all the ways, worst case. Best case, plug & play but - I know my FIL paid $1800 for his used but well equipped Compact 8 over 15 years ago, so what can you expect for less than half?
PDW
-
1st July 2014, 06:37 PM #50GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 2,661
I just file the chinese test reports............
-
1st July 2014, 07:07 PM #51Cba
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Melbourne
- Age
- 69
- Posts
- 1,417
That is rubbish. The larger dealers have established their relationships with particular factories LONG before Alibaba existed. They would have made the link at machine fairs, and most would have visited in person the factories in China. This lathe we are talking about has been made in China since the early 90's. And before that, it was cloned for nearly 10 years in Taiwan (these were actually much better finished). Even today nobody would buy a container stuffed with 60 lathes on Alibaba. Alibaba may be fine if you wanted to import your own lathe, as it would not make sense to organize your own transport just for one.
Even the small ironmonger type of shop owners do not use Alibaba. They buy assorted containers, full of tools and garden shovels, vises and castor wheels, air compressors..... and maybe a couple lathes and mills. They could not be bothered to order it all one by one on Alibaba.
-
1st July 2014, 09:08 PM #52SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 2,324
Chris I'm not going to argue with you about this, but you clearly have no idea how Alibaba works, nor how business is done these days with regard this type of thing. SOME vendors on Alibaba offer 1 piece lots, many don't. I just did a quick search on this type of lathe and noted one vendor had a 50 piece minimum, just for example. Alibaba is HUGE, we all know how big eBay is. We all know how big Amazon is. Alibaba is bigger than BOTH combined. So much for selling garden shovels one at a time
Not that I see how any of this relates to the OP's question, nor lathes in general.
-
2nd July 2014, 12:27 AM #53Cba
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Melbourne
- Age
- 69
- Posts
- 1,417
Some history:
The design actually started in the 1960's as a pretty rigid semi-industrial 7" swing geared head lathe, the Emcomat 7. It then grew into the taller 8" swing geared head Emcomat 8.6.
From there there was a split into two lines. On the one hand into the semi-industrial Maximat V10P and the Maximat Super 11. On the other hand into the hobbylathes Compact 8 and Compact 10 with a belt driven headstock and no Norton box. All these lathes belong to the "3in1" category, with an optional rear bed mounted mill/drill column. Page Title
I bought my Compact8 in the mid 80 for about $3000 barebone (add about $1500 for 2 chucks, collet chuck, changegears, steadies etc etc). In todays money that would translate to about $ 6000 plus accessories. I still have this lathe and love it for smallish workpieces, she will survive me. But you are right, it is an ultralight lathe at only 58kg with motor and chuck.
In the mid 80's there was also a Taiwan made unlicensed copy of the Compact 8 available. It did sell for $1700 including most accessories, half what the Austrian C8 did cost. It was a faithful 1:1 copy down to some minute detail, but fit and finish was much poorer as the original. This lathe was often sold under the generic name "818", meaning 8" swing and 18" between centers.
It is this Taiwanese 818 that the Chinese in turn choose to clone for their 920. They did stretch the headstock and tailstock castings for 9" swing. Extend the lathe bed by 2". Make the 4-way toolpost taller to fit the new center height. Add a half Norton gearbox, and a slotted leadscrew for automatic feed via worm drive. And they sold it for nearly half again the Taiwanese price. I dare to say, the Chinese 920 along with the Sieg 7" minilathe has to be the best selling Chinese lathe model ever built.
So that is the transition from a well built and fairly rigid 1960's semi industrial lathe, to a not-so-rigid and not-so-well built 9" hobbylathe of today. The Emcomat 7 from the 60's did however cost several monthly wages of an average worker, the Chinese 920 from today can be bought with one weeks wage from an average worker. For that, it has to be unbeatable value. But it takes some considerable TLC to make it into a reliable and useful hobbylathe. Many say it is a kit of parts - only pre-assembled to show that all parts are there.