Paedo-bloody-philes

[Gingermick]

Was just feeling a bit stressed ane the news headline said a bloke in Sydney got a years jail for possessing 28000 ############ images of childern as young as 3.
My middle boy is three and his litle sister 1.5 and it got me quite upset. And they've gone to Atherton with Gingerchick for Her Gandfathers funeral.

[Gumby]

Was just feeling a bit stressed ane the news headline said a bloke in Sydney got a years jail for possessing 28000 ############ images of childern as young as 3.
My middle boy is three and his litle sister 1.5.

2,3,4 of the above, then 1. :mad: pricks

[boban]

For mine the worst crime of all. You kill the child in them from that point on.

As someone suggested in another thread, smash two bricks together.

[Gingermick]

I was just so shirty that I didn't bother looking for similar threads

[Jack E]

It is probably the most disgraceful thing a person can do.
I think execution is the only option.
If you remove body parts they will still have the urges and do damage.
One punishment before execution could be to insert a pvc pipe, then insert barbed wire through it and remove the pipe. Lets see them get the barbed wire out.
:mad: :mad: :mad:

Jack

[routermaniac]

I like to think that I am fairly balanced in most things I do and most of my opinions. But this does boil me up because I don't believe that you can rehabilate these people. If there are any shrinks amongst you I am happy to argue my point till the cows come home.

I say lock them up and throw the key away. From what we see day in day out most of these people cannot be rehabilitated, why place more children and more families at risk???? We lock them up for 1 year, we give them psychologists, and they come out more cunning and more disturbed than ever before.

Throw out the key!

[glock40sw]

There needs to be another option in the poll.

Please insert...ALL OF THE ABOVE!!!!!!.... into the poll.
I would happily drop the hammer on this type of scum.
I think I wouldn't be alone.

Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor
Grafton

[monoman]

Was just feeling a bit stressed ane the news headline said a bloke in Sydney got a years jail for possessing 28000 ############ images of childern as young as 3.

My first reaction was isn't this a "thought crime"? I mean, what did the guy do? He wasn't charged with molesting kids, just having pictures.

But it is wrong. It's not that he posessed the pictures, it's that kids have suffered at the hands of those making the images. The law here is aimed a curbing demand for the images. No demand, no images.

George

[E. maculata]

I am your average (token) left wing, liberal, bleeding heart do gooding loves all my fellow human beings type guy, but to be eligible for my compassion you must be human first or at least live by the rules of the pack.

I usually kill dangerous snakes with an old axe

[keith53]

Please insert...ALL OF THE ABOVE!!!!!!.... into the poll.
I would happily drop the hammer on this type of scum.
I think I wouldn't be alone.

Ditto

[Zed]

send him around to my place.

execution is the only answer - no need to stoop to thier level - just kill em outright and be done with them once and for all.

[doug the slug]

the bleeding hearts brigade tell me that most paedophiles were them selves victims of abuse and as such we should try to rehabilitate them. if this is the case, every one of their victims is the next generation of potential paedophiles.

This is where it gets difficult, to eradicate teh problem, we need to stop the future paedophiles from offending in the first place or they are setting up a further generation of paedophiles. therefore it stands to reason that the penalty needs t o be harsh enough to act as a deterrent, like it is with all other crimes, ha ha ha ha.

My youngest child is now 16 but if anyone had have touched my kids they would have wished that the cops had gotten to them before i did.

the punishment must fit the crime. eg, the bali bombers should be put in an isolated jail cell with a large slab of plastic explosives under the floor, and they know that one day, maybe tomorrow and maybe 5 or 10 years from now that it will be detonated when they least expect it. imagine living like that? would that deter others?

[barnsey]

As the husband of a psychologist - everything Doug says is often correct.
Boy can you make an arguement for that philosophy - they are just victims of their environment. You can try and change their outlook on their past - not easy but achievable. Or you could use a bullet - not ethically or morally correct.

Fact is there are perpertrators of both genders albeit in unequal ratios, nontheless it happens - perhaps as a community we need to look out for one another and contribute to the overall welfare of our communities rather than executing a victim? :confused:

I'm quitting now coz this has more barbs than politics and religion put together :eek:

[Zed]

i feel pretty strongly about this thread so I will comment again.

1) kiddie is illegal not only immoral :mad:
2) the kid can never get his innocence back
3) the people who take the photos are evil personified :mad: :mad: :mad:
4) the people who share, distribute, sell or look at kiddie are troubled and should be dealt with as harshly as possible :mad: :mad:
5) "normal" western society punishment does not easily enough discourage this type of abhorance :confused:
6) smashing thier gonads, putting them in prison or physically hurting a troubled mind only makes that mind worse - this is also cumulative; as all involved get to share a compounded horror story which only gets worse in the telling

it is time to stop this behavoiur - fundimentalist societies such as Saudi Arabia have the cure - death by dishonour. quick, painless, humane, no repeat offenders.

I hope some of our western policy makers read such threads and grow some pubes and make a few law adjustments.

[silentC]

Boy can you make an arguement for that philosophy - they are just victims of their environment

Sorry, but I reckon that is a load of crap. You can't tell me that people committing these acts don't know it's wrong. It's in their face - plenty of coverage by the media. You cannot help but know that interfering with a minor is not only a crime but is one of the crimes most despised by the public.

Saying you're only doing it because someone did it to you is just trying to shift the blame. If you want revenge, take it out on the the one who did it to you, not some poor innocent kid. Or do yourself in and save us the grief.

Nup, doesn't wash with me. No excuse and no sympathy for what happens to the sick mongrels when they get locked up. I only wish there was an easier way of tracking them all down. There must be heaps of this that goes on behind closed doors and no-one ever finds out because the victim (yes that's the kid, not the rock spider) is too afraid to tell anyone.