Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  16
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 47 of 47
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    9,037

    Default

    Russell, the 600 is already more rounded.

    Regards from Perth

    Derek
    Visit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    McBride BC Canada
    Posts
    2,999

    Default

    I think that the 600 edge will still be, say, 28 degrees. However, the grit particle size will leave many "run-out" scratches which go all the way to the edge. Those make the edge highly variable in thickness = lots of little, flat teeth, side by side.
    I don't see that I encounter any uniform blunting of the entire edge at all. Over time in use, what I do see is an increasing number of "light-sparks" as bits of the edge crumple to reflect a very strong incident light. I have been using a 20X magnifier to observe this in one spoke shave blade when compared with the other, unused blade. Discouraging, but I can follow the progress. A few swipes on 600, then the same or more on 1500 makes a smoother edge with smaller run-out scratches. Honing the edge (chrome green, 0.5 micron) only changes the scale of the scratching.

    This is why I think the refined edge last longer. There's more uniformity.

    Remember that the reported grit sizes are "nominal" particle size. Although the standard deviation may be small, I suspect that there's a (statistically) 'normal' distribution of particle sizes. Some bigger, some smaller. Quality control can only narrow down, never eliminate that distribution.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •