Results 1 to 15 of 22
-
4th March 2011, 04:46 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 43
puzzled about regulations re replica firearms
OK try not to make this too long.
I always thought they were illegal, however I was in Highpoint shopping center
and in the window of one of their shops I saw a large assortment of replica firearms, ie rifles / AK 47 / Thompson sub machine gun / pistols of all kinds.
I must make this very clear they were metal and looked identical to the real thing. Type in replica pistols and you should come up with Gold Coast War Museum a click on collectors armoury and you will see what I mean.
There is another shop in Ringwood that sells the same thing. When I was in Queensland and visited the museum I asked if I could buy one and was told they are illegal in Victoria. A visit to the site last night and I noticed a footnote stating "we can only send replica pistols to an address in Vic/Queensland/WA
I asked at the shop in highpoint and was told they were legal if they have a red plastic tip in the barrel. A visit to the local Police station was unsatisfactory, and an internet search states a permit is required, however it was rather confusing. SO are they legal or not let me stress they they are as close to the real thing as you can get. A visit to the Gold Coast War museum
and you will see what I mean. I wanted to buy 2 and make a rack to put in my billiard room but first I want to know if it is legal. To say I am puzzled is an understatement, they are presumably illegal but I can buy one
Thanks
-
4th March 2011, 05:33 PM #2
See page 7 under Replica Firearms
If you Google replica firearms Victoria, there are other links, one is to Ebay which also won't allow replica firearms to be sold from Victoria.
-
4th March 2011, 05:50 PM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 43
puzzled about regulations re replica firearms
Thanks for reply.
Pretty well what I thought, but does not explain how the shop can sell them.
I went to Ebay and after a search I saw a luger for sale (with 8 bids) plus many other guns ie flintlocks I was so surprised I checked and found indeed they ban the sale (above gun since sold).
However it still does not explain how this shop can sell them legally. it all is very puzzling.
thanks
-
4th March 2011, 08:12 PM #4GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Sydney,Australia
- Posts
- 42
Oh, it is complicated, and the Victorian Police 'Service' is not making anyones job easier as they refuse to give written answers to queries.
I - suspect - that the shop has obtained, by fair means or foul - some sort of document that states the product they are selling is considered a 'child's toy' and not a replica firearm. In that case, removing or covering the red plastic bit at the muzzle would constitute 'manufacture' of a prohibited weapon/article, as well as possesion.
Just to make things even more poxed up & confusing, NSW has now legislated that an article 'manufactured and sold as a child's toy' is not a replica firearm and there for not a prohibited weapon/article - no provision for any official yes/no decision, once its made & sold as a toy its a toy for ever - I can't really see that one lasting past the first court case where the Police get slapped down by the magistrate, but its currently the law here.
-
8th March 2011, 01:46 PM #5
fuddle headed and muddle minded or the Peter Princple
Are I see you come up against the anomalies of the system.
The rules or laws are made by bureaucrats who have not one wit of a brain and cannot and perhaps will not consider all the ramifications of anything they do or not do and we the great unwashed should never question as they know best.
As for technical issues you raise, well these are far to common to be worthy of contemplation and are mere incidentals on the away to well funded and deserved retirement.
They are of great learning and many of mighty scholarly achievements. Tis I fear that all this may be their undoing for they know more and more about less and less.Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working. — Pablo Picasso
-
8th March 2011, 01:55 PM #6
They are legal if you have a permit. The same rules apply as for owning any gun - that is you need to sit and pass the test to own a replica gun and they still need to be kept within a locked container that cannot be removed from it location, unless it's in a great big gun safe.
-
8th March 2011, 05:18 PM #7
I used to restore antique flintlock pistol and long gun stocks and I really enjoyed the whole process of letting-in the barrel, trigger plate, lock plate and pommel; chequering, carving, ageing and finishing the stock etc. I moved to Australia and not knowing any puff-bang collectors here, I didn't give it any further thought.
One day I received a letter from an old acquaintance in England who had purchased an important antique pistol and wanted me to splice a new end onto its broken and badly repaired butt. I said I would be delighted and he sent me the stripped down stock, the trigger plate (less trigger) and the cast silver pommel. They never arrived. Customs seized it all and had a few questions for me. The last I heard my acquaintance was petitioning Customs to return the items to him.
I still have my seventeenth- and eighteenth-century stock patterns and intend to make a saw someday with a pistol grip similar to the one pictured below. I'm reliably told though that it would be illegal to do so in Victoria!.
I know you believe you understand what you think I wrote, but I'm not sure you realize that what you just read is not what I meant.
Regards, Woodwould.
-
8th March 2011, 11:33 PM #8
And the ridiculous thing about it all is that the rate of gun crime is still rising as apparently those wise law makers haven't realised that criminals don't care about laws
PeteWhat this country needs are more unemployed politicians.
Edward Langley, Artist (1928-1995)
-
9th March 2011, 08:00 AM #9
-
9th March 2011, 01:20 PM #10
Well sorry but snopes is not what I call authorative in this case as like wikepedia it is open to individuals to enter as they like. Also every day in Australian papers are more stories of gun related crimes like todays telegraph and WA news yesterdays SA news this morning etc.
As they say statstics are capable of explaining what you want depending on the way a question is asked. As a member of the gun owning public and the controls I have on them I do see these stories almost daily but then I may be seen as biased on this so will say no more.
PeteWhat this country needs are more unemployed politicians.
Edward Langley, Artist (1928-1995)
-
9th March 2011, 03:35 PM #11
Have a look here then (from the AIC). It shows a decrease in gun crime from 1995 to 2005. Also I believe that the gun crime rate has been dropping for quite some time (it started well before Howard screwed over lawful firearm users/owners).
But you do have a point about guns and criminals. Most gun crime is perpetrated by people who do not posses a firearms license and are using and unregistered firearm.Cheers.
Vernon.
__________________________________________________
Bite off more than you can chew and then chew like crazy.
-
9th March 2011, 03:41 PM #12Cheers.
Vernon.
__________________________________________________
Bite off more than you can chew and then chew like crazy.
-
9th March 2011, 03:52 PM #13
I was informed by the police (in the course of enquiries regarding making and selling reproduction pistol/gun stocks for collectors/dealers) that to possess a gun stock or something that could be interpreted as one would be an offence. I was also told that even possessing technical drawings or patterns for such articles could probably land me in hot water too!
.
I know you believe you understand what you think I wrote, but I'm not sure you realize that what you just read is not what I meant.
Regards, Woodwould.
-
9th March 2011, 04:11 PM #14Cheers.
Vernon.
__________________________________________________
Bite off more than you can chew and then chew like crazy.
-
9th March 2011, 04:26 PM #15
Overzealous; I agree, but that is what was told to me.
Technically, I may be in breach of the law, but unless the police tacked 'possession of illegal drawings' onto a string of other, more serious charges, I doubt if any court would convict me. Still, I'm not about to drive round the local nick with the drawings plastered all over my car..
I know you believe you understand what you think I wrote, but I'm not sure you realize that what you just read is not what I meant.
Regards, Woodwould.
Bookmarks