Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: Redgum or Bloodwood tree?
-
10th June 2010, 06:59 PM #1
What... you mean it's not 1792?
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 0
Redgum or Bloodwood tree?
.
I know you believe you understand what you think I wrote, but I'm not sure you realize that what you just read is not what I meant.
Regards, Woodwould.
-
10th June 2010, 11:01 PM #2
Skwair2rownd
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Dundowran Beach
- Age
- 77
- Posts
- 0
:d:d:d
-
11th June 2010, 12:08 AM #3
Heavy Machinery
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Lambton, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Posts
- 1
Wow, crazy man!
-
11th June 2010, 01:46 AM #4
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Perth
- Age
- 58
- Posts
- 0
That couldn't be uglier if they substituted a heart for the trunk!
Graeme
-
11th June 2010, 05:07 AM #5rrich Guest
When I lived in Phoenix, Arizona there was a type of tree that was trimmed (If you want to call it that.) way back during late Autumn. Then they would paint the remaining part of the tree white to prevent sun burn. (That's all I know. My total gardening skills are only to write the cheque for the synthetic turf without messing up the cheque book.)
-
11th June 2010, 05:29 PM #6
Retiring type.
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Pretty Sally Hill, Wallan Vic
- Age
- 85
- Posts
- 0
Looks like a currant tree that has been crossed
with an electrical current.
Yeah, I know. Currants do not grow on trees but
for this joke they do.
AllanLife is short ... smile while you still have teeth.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks