Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 19
Thread: Ridges in Hard Shellac
-
26th August 2009, 09:04 PM #1
Ridges in Hard Shellac
OK, so I've done a search and read about other peoples experiences with ridges in HS, and now I have 2 questions.....
I applied the HS with a brush, and I think I can figure out how I made most of the ridges and how to get rid of them (practice!!!), but my question is, would applying with a pad/rubber reduce the ridges, potentialy being easier to give a more even application and having less defined edges than a brush?
Second, when applying HS which is worse, a warm day or a windy day? And by worse I mean makes it go off faster.
Oh, I'm applying the HS to a serving tray of less than 2sq. ft.
Ben
-
27th August 2009, 08:23 PM #2
You can also get rid of ridges by sanding, best brush results are with a polishing mop, or steal a decent make up brush from your wife. They give a much more even flow of a shellac type product than any other brush will. Very dense and soft, usually something like badger hair.
A pad will always give you a smoother application than any brush, and shouldn't really leave any ridges at all... for this type of surface easiest result is usually a mix of the two. Brush 2-3 coats to get some film thickness up, give it a sand to get it flat and swap to the pad or rubber. Obviously the rubber leaves a far thinner coat than a brush so if you use it from start to finish it will take far longer.
Lastly hot or windy... either would be pretty equally an anathema to a brush coating, as they steal the solvent from the finish before it gets a chance to sit and level as much as it can. On the other hand with a pad/rubber you'd actually be able to get more done as the surface will harden far faster than it would on a cooler day. Enabling you to keep applying more and more coats with relative ease.
RegardsLast edited by spectre; 27th August 2009 at 08:25 PM. Reason: typos
-
27th August 2009, 08:46 PM #3
-
27th August 2009, 10:36 PM #4
I've found it helpful to thin the shellac before brushing. Polisher's Handbook recommends adding 25% meth, which was great on vertical surfaces but I needed a bit more on flat surfaces.
(this is assuming you're using the UBeaut Hard Shellac)
Tex
-
15th September 2009, 06:24 PM #5
OK, I wet/dry sanded back the HS, sanded through the HS (of course) and now the timber in some parts is staying a milky white, like sanded poly, and some parts are refusing to gloss, even after 5 or 6 coats of HS. To re-cap, I started with Dewaxed White/Talc sanded back (dry) applied HS sanded back (wet) and now I'm having problems. I'm suspecting that the water may be the cause. btw, there was more than a week between wet sanding and re-applying the HS, so everything was dry.
whadoido?
-
15th September 2009, 06:55 PM #6
Ben, what sort of brush are you using and how large is the surface?
I recently had a chat to Uncle Neil ( ) and he recommended a camel hair bulb style brush. I haven't been able to locate a camel hair version yet but I did find one in Spotlight that had the correct shape. It was a lot better than the other brushes I have used for shellac as it held lots of shellac and I could control the release from the brush better. I have had the same problem with earlier attempts and think it can also be caused by the brush having insufficient shellac on it so it dries and smears instead of flowing on.
Try a sample on a long-ish board using a reasonable amount of shellac. This is where a good brush comes in to play and is, I suspect, why Neil likes the shape he recommended to me. I'll try to find a pic and post it for you.
EDIT: Here is a link to a very good article on shellac by Jeff Jewitt
-
30th September 2009, 06:34 PM #7
why not spray the shellac, ? i always spray mine does in 20 mins what would take days by hand and a far superior finish.i usually apply the last two coats with more metho than the main coats and it turns out like glass ,i like to do it on a warm day when spraying ................bob
-
30th September 2009, 06:55 PM #8
Thanks bob, could you tell me about your setup?
-
30th September 2009, 07:56 PM #9
A few years ago I got a brush similar to that which Groggy has mentioned from Paint-Right. I think the correct term is "Mop Brush". It was not cheap but certainly holds the shellac well and spreads it evenly
Tom
"It's good enough" is low aim
-
30th September 2009, 08:00 PM #10
After trying a non mop brush, I think that the advantage with the mop would be that it is less likely to leave a ridge at the edge of the brush as they are more rounded edges.
-
1st October 2009, 01:36 AM #11
More likely to be the fact that regular brush only has about 5% of the number of hairs. Ie a 25mm mop could have around 50,000 super fine soft hairs where a 75mm standard brush may only have 2,500. Hence ridges because of the coarseness as opposed to none due to the fineness of the bristles in the mop.
The difference is astounding. Not only that but a good 25mm mop will hold more polish than a 75mm common garden variety bristle brush. Unless of course the bristle brush is a superfine natural hair brush like the one being made in this film (fascinating to watch) on the making of a Gramercy Tools Finishing Brush.
European Ox hair brush heads.
European Ox hair is exactly that. Made from the hair found in the ears of European Oxen it is the finest hair used for finishing brushes. Before spraying finish was invented, finishers in both the woodworking and enamelling industries (including early automobile makers) looked for the softest fullest brushes to apply the best, brush-mark free finishes possible. European Ox, Badger, Squirrel, and Fitch were the favoured choices. Of these types of hair only European Ox is still available in the quantity and at the cost to make an affordable, yet high performance brush.
Cheers - Neil
PS the examples above of hairs in brushes is purely guess work and just to give an example of the difference in hairs and quality between a mop and a regular brush.
-
1st October 2009, 05:59 PM #12
-
2nd October 2009, 11:12 AM #13
-
3rd October 2009, 04:15 PM #14
Purchased a set of three of those brushes a couple of years ago an used one for the first time today to put a couple of coats of Hard Shellac onto a stool made by Big Stan Ceglinski for Pauline.
It is absolutely fantastic. The finish is literally free from brush marks and the polish (2 metho to 1 hard shellac) flowed on effortlessly and looks a million dollars with just 2 coats.
Can't recommend these brushes highly enough. Brilliant....
Attachment 118022
Gramercy Tools Finishing Brush
Cheers - NeilKEEP A LID ON THE GARBAGE... Report spam, scams, and inappropriate posts, PMs and Blogs.
Use the Report icon at the bottom of all Posts, PM's and Blog entries.
-
6th October 2009, 01:15 PM #15
Similar Threads
-
Hard Shellac
By Yxoc in forum FINISHINGReplies: 3Last Post: 29th July 2008, 02:11 PM -
Ub Shellac Not Hard Enough?
By Barry F in forum FINISHINGReplies: 6Last Post: 1st November 2006, 09:39 PM -
who uses hard shellac ...
By la Huerta in forum FINISHINGReplies: 11Last Post: 14th March 2006, 07:00 PM -
Hard Shellac
By Shaty40 in forum FINISHINGReplies: 2Last Post: 9th July 2005, 10:36 AM -
New use for Hard Shellac
By Chesand in forum FINISHINGReplies: 9Last Post: 27th January 2005, 08:55 PM
Bookmarks