



Results 1 to 15 of 27
Thread: Katrina verses the Tsunami
-
3rd September 2005, 11:58 PM #1
Katrina verses the Tsunami
I was watching the TV this evening about the aftermath of civil unrest in New Orleans (looting, rapes, murder etc). I can't remember reports of similar behaviour of the tsunami victims. I am not talking about the small village environments but the much larger towns which the tsunami hit - the best comparison that could be made to a western city.
Perhaps I'm wrong and there were reports. Perhaps the press are beating up isolated incidents in New Orleans or perhaps a rapes and murders are common in New Orleans and it's just that there is a different backdrop (the devestation).
I am not condeming the people of New Orleans and they certainly have my sympathy but it just made me feel sad (and angry) that such actions occur on top of such a tragedy.
What do you people think?
BurnBurn
When all points of view have equal time The chatter of idiots will drown out the wise
-
4th September 2005, 01:40 AM #2
isn't it amazing how the "civilized" people react when they are deprived of their "privilages"
I try and do new things twice.. the first time to see if I can do it.. the second time to see if I like it
Kev
-
4th September 2005, 07:54 AM #3
lets try and disect this phenonemon:
asia by and large is "poor"
america by and large has a very large distinction between the "very rich" and the "moderately poor" thus the filthy poor are constantly reminded just by looking out thier wondows how pleasant it is to own a ferrari or wear the latest gucci accessory.
I say moderately poor as I feel that the poor in america have it far better than say the poor in bangladesh or thailand for instance...
the americans by and large are also far better educated (even the poor go to grammar schools) so can mostly read and importantly understand how to control the remote on the teev. Thus they are exposed to the "Consumer society must haves". Perhaps when they see the oppotunity to get these consumer goods suplied by great equaliser, they cant help themselves.
In asia on the other hand the poor dont have teevs or there aint much to covet.
on the other hand I could be wrong, perhaps the looters were justshot and not reported in asia.
ive been wrong before.... perhaps its just the dog and 2 meals syndrome - Ie they say a dog is only 2 meals from being a wild animal, perhaps its the same for humans, we may not have teeth but we have brains that are far more deadly.... when was the last time a boxer invented napalm ?
cheersZed
-
4th September 2005, 07:59 AM #4
Perhaps it's an outcome of the higher levels of gun ownership in America: i.e. gangs shooting at rescue helicopters etc.
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them . . . well, I have others.
-
4th September 2005, 08:05 AM #5
dont think that it is only the seppos that behave like this, in 1998 i lived in katherine which is the 3rd or 4th largest town in the n.t. the katherine river went up 20 odd meters in a couple of days and wasted 70% of the homes and 98% of the business in town and killed at least 5 people. i would have draged at least 20 looters out of business in the main street alone several boats had holes shot in them by the police or raaf from the local base. when some people think that they have a chance to get away with theving they will have a go at it. to my way of thinking looting is the same as kicking someone in the head while they are having a heart atack.
the thing that amazes me is how slow the us govt is to act
peter
-
4th September 2005, 09:29 AM #6
Originally Posted by shep
It scares me even more if the later is true.
BurnBurn
When all points of view have equal time The chatter of idiots will drown out the wise
-
4th September 2005, 09:48 AM #7
I think it is funny how the US goverment can spend billions of dollars to send a plane half way around the world to bomb a peseant and his camel, but cant help their own people. :confused:
Also with the looters. it puts a whole differnt spin on " Martin Looter King "
Al :confused:
-
4th September 2005, 10:00 AM #8
Why would you build here?
Yes it is a disaster, my condolences to all involved. The people knew that it could happen, most probably had the notion of " not in my life time" and did not plan for the event.
As you can see from the attached pic, it is mainly under mean sea level and trapped between two great bodies of water. Not a place to build with any level of confidence.
The "Authorities" Local/State/Federal had a few days notice to evac the population - tall order I grant, but they also had a few days to preposition rescue services in the area, with supplies.
The residents that could/would not evac - what was to stop them purchasing supplies of tinned food and bottled water? The "Ladies" retirement home featured last night on Aunty's 1900 news - the proprietors could have evac'd or at least made sure that consumables were on hand.
I know handsight is perfect, but a bit of common sense would have been good too!
The greatest nation on earth? And our Little Johnny following Little Junior backside! I fear for this country's future . . .
Rant Off!Pat
Work is a necessary evil to be avoided. Mark Twain
-
4th September 2005, 10:05 AM #9
Originally Posted by Zed
Burn, do not be sad or angry. Be concerned. Very concerned. This is human nature. Our civilisation is two meals away from a Mad Max type society. It happened in New Orleans, and it can happen here.
-
4th September 2005, 10:11 AM #10
There is a phenomenon known as Maslo's Hierarchy of Need. He states that there are distinct levels ie philanthropy and artistic pursuits at the top and subsistance at the bottom.
These people have gone from near the top level to the bottom overnight, so their values, which are at best a thin veneer, have taken a back seat to survival.
What is not apparent is the media effect where isolated incidents are made to appear like the norm. For instance, during the early days I heard there was widespread shootings and attacks on rescue craft. I looked at dozens of news reports on a RSS feed and (at that time) only saw two documented incidents - the shooting at the Chinook helo and the National Guardsman being shot. This was made to sound like masssive civil disobedience but there was no evidence put forward.
There will be looting, there will be other crime. But please do not blindly believe the media, they are once again doing us a massive disservice. Remember that the majority of the looters are looking for food, water, medicines or shelter. The media are not highlighting this, just the exceptions.
What I would like to know though, is why the world is not assisting more. The USA helps in virtually every major calamity, but when it happens to them the world goes to watch it on TV, I think that is a disgrace. Oh, and our $10m donation, that won't even buy bottled clean water for two days.
-
4th September 2005, 10:37 AM #11
There are many facets to this disaster some of which have been glanced over by the above,
While i think looting is very low, I also have never been in a desperate situation like they are in, so I cannot say what I would do if I was in there boots.
I am sure that many did stock up before the hurricane hit, then lost everything when it did, If that was the case, then what option do they have but to try to get food & water to ensure there survival?
IanSome People are like slinky's,
They serve no purpose at all,
but they put a smile on your face when you throw them down the stairs.
-
4th September 2005, 12:32 PM #12
Originally Posted by shep
Originally Posted by groggy
Every country is willing to help, but money is one thing they do not need from us.Mick
avantguardian
-
4th September 2005, 01:36 PM #13
May as well have a bit of a rant.
The US government is slow to react? Compared to what, or to whom? Heard about Tracy? Read the mobilisation reports? Read the looting reports?
The logistics are very complex - you can't fly in help if the airports are unserviceable. You can fly helicopters but they can't use contaminated fuel. You can preposition supplies and troops but where and how? They need food and accomodation, you can't send them in by truck to NO because all freeways are open to exiting traffic only. Rushing in makes the situation worse and, in a short period of time, the rescuers need help too.
As for the US Government not wanting others on their shores, perhaps, but logistics is probably the main issue. Not many countries could get their equipment there in time to be of help anyway. What is important to the US is offers of specialist help, funding relief or whatever they need. Just the offer may be enough.
As for ego problems, geez Mick, that's unfair. Ever seen Australian tourists in action overseas, or the posturing of Aussie pollies?
As for a country with trillions of dollars national debt not wanting financial help, I am not sure of that either.
FYI: The Outstanding USA Public Debt as of 04 Sep 2005 at 02:30:29 AM GMT was: $ 7,946,457,571,471.90
The yanks have their problems, yes. But as someone who has lived there, and in other countries, I think they don't deserve some of the comments.
-
4th September 2005, 01:51 PM #14
How many of any of us would not loot food and water if we were starving and nothing seemed to be happening in the way of aid??
-
4th September 2005, 01:59 PM #15
Originally Posted by Groggy
Originally Posted by Groggy
We should, and I thnk we have offered specialist technical help. We have good managers here who would do a good job getting help where it's needed. (They can have my boss first)Mick
avantguardian
Similar Threads
-
Quations about the tsunami
By echnidna in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RENOVATIONReplies: 17Last Post: 8th March 2005, 02:53 PM
Bookmarks